Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BR's Project White, "completed". Lots of information.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #46  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
I see your MAF pipe in the list. Are you changing your recommendation on sticking with the stock MAF pipe for stock ECU cars? Just curious where you think the stock ECU needs the most attention to make the BR MAF pipe work -- MAF scaling? FYI, I have one of your MAF pipes on the shelf that I stopped using a couple years ago to simplify tuning when I went to 280 cams, but I'd love to reinstall it if I could make it work.

Nice build. I've got an 04 RS with white SSRs and mostly BR power mods (including a Red), so this car resembles mine a lot. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the E85
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #47  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
I know it's hot there, but doesn't the dyno have WC?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #48  
D420mac's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Nap Town Maryland
Nice looking!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #49  
Gavin@TopLevelPerformance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: NY
Impressive set up David
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #50  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
That thing is cleaner then it was when it came out of the factory probably.

The craftsmenship and finish from this is absolutely flawless! The power is very impressive as well.

If i got the 2.3 with TT rods would it be the same as with the crower rods?

Buschur power baby!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #51  
weap0n's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Australia
It is so clean. So simple. Very effective streetable car. Great work.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #52  
WHTEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO
Car looks great!

Did you get to figure out the "mod" for the double pumpers that are able to support 1000hp? If so can you share pricing etc? PM me if you prefer. Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #53  
2highpsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge Ohio
Now that you have learned more about the stock ECU do you still believe you could make more power if the car were on an AEM ems?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #54  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Answers from Page 3.

First and most, thank ALL of you guys for the comments on the car. I really appreciate all the kind words on it!

CBRD, thanks for support on the car and for using so many of our engines in your builds.

crcain, you asked if because of the results of this car if I am considering to suggest a stand alone differently than I use to. I would say yes to an extent. First I know for a fact just taking the MAF sensor out of the flow path of the turbo inlet the car will gain atleast 15 whp, maybe even more at this power level. I have considered putting the AEM EMS on the car just to see how much more power it will make. I am very confident the switch would instantly put the car over 500 whp. With that said, in the past I have advised anyone using any of these things; big cams, big injectors, big turbo, to use a stand alone. That will no longer be the case. I do think for a max effort build and someone who wants all the power they can get the stand alone is still the way to go. I'm not at the shop, yes, I could overlay the graphs, just remind me next week.

yahu, the ride height on the car is lower than stock and I have a little bit of rake in the stance. I refuse to roll the rear fenders on this car. I also plan to have four people in the car quite often. I don't want the tires to rub or the car to bottom out. I left the ride a little higher because of those things.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 05:46 PM
  #55  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
From page 4.

evo8ltw, no reason to not run the double bend or single bend MAF pipe on the car as long as you are able to tune it. This build is everything I have ever advised against doing with the stock ECU. 1200 cc injectors, Jun 272's, stroked, E85, higher compression, double bend maf pipe. The car idle very good.

jordans4, my dyno does not have weather correction. I can input the values myself but do not use any type of correction, ever. I don't care what the car is going to make on any day except for the day I am dyno'ing it.

project skyline, we are not going to offer the TT rods for the strokers. It requires to much extra machine work to get them to fit. Strokers get either standard Manley rods or Crowers.

whtevo, yes, this car actually has the double pumper mod done to it. It is running a stock rail right now and prototype parts we put together. The CNC machine was down for weeks that was needed to machine the parts. It is back up now and I hope within the next few weeks we have finished product to release. No pricing as of yet.

2highpsi, I am sure the car would make more power on a stand alone with speed density.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #56  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
OK now for an update. The car had a horrible stumble in it when it was cold. Not tolerable actually. This morning I made some adjustments to the accel enrichment and it was 100% fixed. I need to start it cold again and make sure but the changes I made this morning were a night and day difference.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #57  
4kinboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: long island,ny
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
OK now for an update. The car had a horrible stumble in it when it was cold. Not tolerable actually. This morning I made some adjustments to the accel enrichment and it was 100% fixed. I need to start it cold again and make sure but the changes I made this morning were a night and day difference.

Did you have a chance to try your "smash mod"?? (Just responding to your question from page 1.)... Sheet looked like the bov was giving up a little.

Love the new car!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #58  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
David - very impressive - again what distinquishes Buschur from the rest - the simplicity of the line - the minamalistic approach - the perfect balance and choice of parts - Buschur all the way
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #59  
bbyevo8u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 2
From: NY
very nice!! if i had 8k to put in my car i would go with your setup
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:40 PM
  #60  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
jordans4, my dyno does not have weather correction. I can input the values myself but do not use any type of correction, ever. I don't care what the car is going to make on any day except for the day I am dyno'ing it.
Ok thanks. I know the new Mustang software can do it, and on the dyno sheet you posted it says Eng Power/Torque WC. I assumed those were corrected numbers.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 PM.