BR's Project White, "completed". Lots of information.
I see your MAF pipe in the list. Are you changing your recommendation on sticking with the stock MAF pipe for stock ECU cars? Just curious where you think the stock ECU needs the most attention to make the BR MAF pipe work -- MAF scaling? FYI, I have one of your MAF pipes on the shelf that I stopped using a couple years ago to simplify tuning when I went to 280 cams, but I'd love to reinstall it if I could make it work.
Nice build. I've got an 04 RS with white SSRs and mostly BR power mods (including a Red), so this car resembles mine a lot. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the E85
Nice build. I've got an 04 RS with white SSRs and mostly BR power mods (including a Red), so this car resembles mine a lot. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the E85
That thing is cleaner then it was when it came out of the factory probably.
The craftsmenship and finish from this is absolutely flawless! The power is very impressive as well.
If i got the 2.3 with TT rods would it be the same as with the crower rods?
Buschur power baby!
The craftsmenship and finish from this is absolutely flawless! The power is very impressive as well.
If i got the 2.3 with TT rods would it be the same as with the crower rods?
Buschur power baby!
Answers from Page 3.
First and most, thank ALL of you guys for the comments on the car. I really appreciate all the kind words on it!
CBRD, thanks for support on the car and for using so many of our engines in your builds.
crcain, you asked if because of the results of this car if I am considering to suggest a stand alone differently than I use to. I would say yes to an extent. First I know for a fact just taking the MAF sensor out of the flow path of the turbo inlet the car will gain atleast 15 whp, maybe even more at this power level. I have considered putting the AEM EMS on the car just to see how much more power it will make. I am very confident the switch would instantly put the car over 500 whp. With that said, in the past I have advised anyone using any of these things; big cams, big injectors, big turbo, to use a stand alone. That will no longer be the case. I do think for a max effort build and someone who wants all the power they can get the stand alone is still the way to go. I'm not at the shop, yes, I could overlay the graphs, just remind me next week.
yahu, the ride height on the car is lower than stock and I have a little bit of rake in the stance. I refuse to roll the rear fenders on this car. I also plan to have four people in the car quite often. I don't want the tires to rub or the car to bottom out. I left the ride a little higher because of those things.
First and most, thank ALL of you guys for the comments on the car. I really appreciate all the kind words on it!
CBRD, thanks for support on the car and for using so many of our engines in your builds.
crcain, you asked if because of the results of this car if I am considering to suggest a stand alone differently than I use to. I would say yes to an extent. First I know for a fact just taking the MAF sensor out of the flow path of the turbo inlet the car will gain atleast 15 whp, maybe even more at this power level. I have considered putting the AEM EMS on the car just to see how much more power it will make. I am very confident the switch would instantly put the car over 500 whp. With that said, in the past I have advised anyone using any of these things; big cams, big injectors, big turbo, to use a stand alone. That will no longer be the case. I do think for a max effort build and someone who wants all the power they can get the stand alone is still the way to go. I'm not at the shop, yes, I could overlay the graphs, just remind me next week.
yahu, the ride height on the car is lower than stock and I have a little bit of rake in the stance. I refuse to roll the rear fenders on this car. I also plan to have four people in the car quite often. I don't want the tires to rub or the car to bottom out. I left the ride a little higher because of those things.
From page 4.
evo8ltw, no reason to not run the double bend or single bend MAF pipe on the car as long as you are able to tune it. This build is everything I have ever advised against doing with the stock ECU. 1200 cc injectors, Jun 272's, stroked, E85, higher compression, double bend maf pipe. The car idle very good.
jordans4, my dyno does not have weather correction. I can input the values myself but do not use any type of correction, ever. I don't care what the car is going to make on any day except for the day I am dyno'ing it.
project skyline, we are not going to offer the TT rods for the strokers. It requires to much extra machine work to get them to fit. Strokers get either standard Manley rods or Crowers.
whtevo, yes, this car actually has the double pumper mod done to it. It is running a stock rail right now and prototype parts we put together. The CNC machine was down for weeks that was needed to machine the parts. It is back up now and I hope within the next few weeks we have finished product to release. No pricing as of yet.
2highpsi, I am sure the car would make more power on a stand alone with speed density.
evo8ltw, no reason to not run the double bend or single bend MAF pipe on the car as long as you are able to tune it. This build is everything I have ever advised against doing with the stock ECU. 1200 cc injectors, Jun 272's, stroked, E85, higher compression, double bend maf pipe. The car idle very good.
jordans4, my dyno does not have weather correction. I can input the values myself but do not use any type of correction, ever. I don't care what the car is going to make on any day except for the day I am dyno'ing it.
project skyline, we are not going to offer the TT rods for the strokers. It requires to much extra machine work to get them to fit. Strokers get either standard Manley rods or Crowers.
whtevo, yes, this car actually has the double pumper mod done to it. It is running a stock rail right now and prototype parts we put together. The CNC machine was down for weeks that was needed to machine the parts. It is back up now and I hope within the next few weeks we have finished product to release. No pricing as of yet.
2highpsi, I am sure the car would make more power on a stand alone with speed density.
OK now for an update. The car had a horrible stumble in it when it was cold. Not tolerable actually. This morning I made some adjustments to the accel enrichment and it was 100% fixed. I need to start it cold again and make sure but the changes I made this morning were a night and day difference.
OK now for an update. The car had a horrible stumble in it when it was cold. Not tolerable actually. This morning I made some adjustments to the accel enrichment and it was 100% fixed. I need to start it cold again and make sure but the changes I made this morning were a night and day difference.
Did you have a chance to try your "smash mod"?? (Just responding to your question from page 1.)... Sheet looked like the bov was giving up a little.
Love the new car!
David - very impressive - again what distinquishes Buschur from the rest - the simplicity of the line - the minamalistic approach - the perfect balance and choice of parts - Buschur all the way
Ok thanks. I know the new Mustang software can do it, and on the dyno sheet you posted it says Eng Power/Torque WC. I assumed those were corrected numbers.







