Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Which turbo would you choose
FP Red
27
45.00%
FP HTA 3582
2
3.33%
FP HTA 3586
15
25.00%
PTE 6262
16
26.67%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Which Turbo would you choose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
dambikeracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Which Turbo would you choose

I have a Red that I have not put on yet but am already thinking of going bigger.

FP Red
FP HTA 3582
FP HTA 3586
PTE 6262
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
dambikeracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Could I also get some feed back from anyone running these turbo's? Pros, cons, spool RPM on 2.0L.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #3  
jusa4bngr05mr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
Go biggg. can I have your red. lol
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #4  
mini_evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: U.S. Army..... 09226
I say do the FP HTA 3586R. From everything I have read about the HTA 35 turbo's, the .86 spools 2-300 RPM later than the .82 on a stock 2.0L. it Should be at full spool around 3600 RPM.

And I dont know **** about the PTE 6262 other than it is a Frickin' MONSTER of a turbo and that it is to small for a 2.0l to be effective.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
3586 and 6262 are pretty evenly matched, but the 6262 is better priced. The 3582 wont make as much power but will spool a bit quicker. If you wont be tuning for 700+whp but still want 500+ go with either the 3582 or Precision 6062.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #6  
skyblas's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: MS/SG...now in perth
3586 would be the better choice if u want bigger power with overall drivability
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
EvoAlex48's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
hta 3586
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by dambikeracer
Could I also get some feed back from anyone running these turbo's? Pros, cons, spool RPM on 2.0L.
Two things for you to consider:

(1) Whatever these turbos spool at sea level means little to you. They will all spool slower in Denver (at altitude). Think about how that affects your driving habits.

(2) The FP Red is capable of spooling faster than any larger turbo, and when configured properly, one would have to make a good deal more power with a larger turbo to catch up to the Red.

The power potential of the Red is making it increasingly difficult to justify larger turbos for street use.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #9  
EVILBLOODBROTHA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Classified
I'd have to say it's all about the ams turbo systems that they offer. Like the 850 thats a sick setup
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #10  
DBallz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC
Originally Posted by Ted B
Two things for you to consider:

(1) Whatever these turbos spool at sea level means little to you. They will all spool slower in Denver (at altitude). Think about how that affects your driving habits.

(2) The FP Red is capable of spooling faster than any larger turbo, and when configured properly, one would have to make a good deal more power with a larger turbo to catch up to the Red.

The power potential of the Red is making it increasingly difficult to justify larger turbos for street use.
I just installed the red and my numbers very high for pump gas.

Check the graph
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...mp-469whp.html
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #11  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
For the money, the 6262 is hard to beat. AMS is running 8's with that turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #12  
VETTE_50_TH's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: fake
Never buy a PTE ball bearing turbo unless you want to be replacing them every 10k. I come from the disregarded land of dsms, and i have PROOF these BB turbos **** the bed quite often. Stick to a FP turbo or a MHI turbo. FP def. know their ****, and their turbos are VERY nice. But im sure you know that.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Read Ted B. above.

Power under the curve says RED. Up here, you'll add a few hundred RPMs to spool, and unless you have a built motor and can use an expanded powerband like 5000-9000, the larger turbos will not spool very long before you hit factory redline.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #14  
murrtownevo9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: socal
FP red FTW
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #15  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Originally Posted by VETTE_50_TH
Never buy a PTE ball bearing turbo unless you want to be replacing them every 10k. I come from the disregarded land of dsms, and i have PROOF these BB turbos **** the bed quite often. Stick to a FP turbo or a MHI turbo. FP def. know their ****, and their turbos are VERY nice. But im sure you know that.
Good to know. Nobody mentioned this in the thread I have going:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/en...262-turbo.html

I'm going with the FP 3586.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:40 AM.