Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2010 Borg Warner Airwerks Turbo catalog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 05:42 AM
  #106  
chuntington101's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
Geoff,

Could you pleae give us some information on the BW S300V? what is the power range of the turbo? what would the spools times be? Are there any larger VNT turbos out there that could be used?

Regards,

Chris.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #107  
Demon_ni2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 7
From: Birmingham, AL
Hey Geoff,

Im looking to order a turbo in the next few days, cant decide on what i want still
what i want is the Largest looking turbo possible, that will still spool decent.

Im looking for the Largest looking turbo that you think would spool decent.
motor setup 9.5:1 comp, and will be running on e85, head has been port n polished, currently stock cam, but will more then likely change by the time its running in February.

Ive always like the race covers on the s372 turbos i always thought it made them look crazy large. but it isnt a 'have to have' thing. and that turbo i believe is way to large.

Car is mostly for drag, and highway pulls, and the manifold were building will be rather large, 24-26inch long runners counting the collector.

(hate to say it, but the new setup were doing is mostly for LOOKS rather then function, so going big might not work out perfect, but it will still be a huge step up and its what i have now)

I was told to stick with something like the s300sx 83/75, it looks massive compared to anything else in its class and im upgrading from a 60 trim t3/to4e that i thought spooled absolutely fine, do you have any comparison pictures of the s300sx 83/75 to a 91/79 and a s372? (is there a big size difference?)

i figured the smallest turbo i wanted to go with would be the s300sx 83/75 unless u have a suggestion for something that looks larger and will spool as well if not better.

oh, and is it possible to get the s372 racecover on the s300 83/75? (donno why i thought of that, or is there something like the s372 with rc that spools as well as the s300sx 83/75?)

Sorry, alot of questions im bombarding you with, but the comparison picture of the 3 turbos is definitely one thing i want to see and also get your suggestion on a turbo i should go with. Cars mostly for show, drag and highway pulls.. It is driven on the street, but mostly just for fun, and the laggier turbos i actually think suit my driving style alot better, it allows me to drive around town moderately without really getting heavy into boost, if i can shift gears at wot and stay in boost its not to big for me!

Thanks

Daniel

Last edited by Demon_ni2; Jan 7, 2010 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #108  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
After seeing the interest for a 67mm drag racing class, ive been asking BW to build a turbo specifically designed for this 67mm class rulebook: http://full-race.com/prototype/twins.../67mmRULES.jpg - here are some pics of the S400SX 67mm, the compressor wheel is capable of 88 lb/min


^42R sized inlet


^high efficiency extended tip compressor wheel


^excellent turbine blade inlet tip curvature


^vband connection from housings to center section

This was built to be a direct drop-in for the GT42R and S400SX (aka 372) so all the guys who have a big runner t4 twinscroll manifold w/ 4" downpipe wouldnt have to change anything to run this turbo

Last edited by Geoff Raicer; Jan 7, 2010 at 08:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #109  
Force-Fed Performance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, Fayetteville NC
Im so on this LOL
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 06:21 PM
  #110  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Whats the exhaust wheel specs on this new turbo? For somebody who is not a class racer, just wants big power how do you think this new turbo will do against the "s372" as far as spool/response time goes?

Have that 91-79 been tested yet.

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #111  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
the S372 is what bullseye has renamed the Borg Warner S400SX *71mm*. Why bullseye named it that makes no sense because its an S4 series turbo with a 71.08mm inducer.

All the S400SX turbos have the identical outer dimensions, the difference is that the 71.08mm compressor wheel flows 92lb/min, this 67.7 flows 88lb/min.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #112  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
the S372 is what bullseye has renamed the Borg Warner S400SX *71mm*. Why bullseye named it that makes no sense because its an S4 series turbo with a 71.08mm inducer.

All the S400SX turbos have the identical outer dimensions, the difference is that the 71.08mm compressor wheel flows 92lb/min, this 67.7 flows 88lb/min.
I was never a fan of the BEP rename style, but its easier for most to remember. I dont get the S372 rename either, but I think its because they dont want it confused with the K31 71mm wheel. I think they also call it the S372 because it uses the 83mm turbine rather than the 96mm. Keeps things simple, but its definitely not correct.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #113  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by chuntington101
Geoff,

Could you pleae give us some information on the BW S300V? what is the power range of the turbo? what would the spools times be? Are there any larger VNT turbos out there that could be used?

Regards,

Chris.
hey chris sorry i wasnt able to post up sooner. Basically the S300V is a somewhat exotic turbo available in a few configurations ranging from 61mm to their 66.7mm with billet ti compressor wheel. The "VTG" housing as they call it is a PWM signal 0-5V and certainly possible to control with most any standalone. The main issue is that it really needs to be run on E85 in order to keep the EGT from overheating the vanepacks. What kind of airflow rates are you looking for and what is the engine spec? The only safe way to use a VNT aka VTG turbo on a gasoline engine's EGT is to use dual BV50's, but thats much more expensive


Originally Posted by Demon_ni2
do you have any comparison pictures of the s300sc 83/75 to a 91/79
here is a good comparison photo of the garrett 40R vs precision 67 vs BW S300SX 83-75 (88-75 and 91-79 are the same size as this)


its pretty interesting to see how much larger the BW 83-75 is compared to the 40R garrett and precision

Originally Posted by Demon_ni2
motor setup 9.5:1 comp, and will be running on e85, head has been port n polished, currently stock cam, but will more then likely change by the time its running in February. The manifold were building will be rather large, 24-26inch long runners counting the collector. I was told to stick with something like the s300sx 83/75, it looks massive compared to anything else in its class and im upgrading from a 60 trim t3/to4e that i thought spooled absolutely fine, do you have any comparison pictures of the s300sc 83/75 to a 91/79 and a s372? (is there a big size difference?). i figured the smallest turbo i wanted to go with would be the s300sx 83/75 unless u have a suggestion
I agree 100% the 83/75 could work very well for your application. If you plan on using the stock cams for a while it makes the most sense to be on the 83/75, once you get the bigger cams in the 88/75 could give you additional top end. You absolutely should never use anything giant oversized compressor housings like you asked about

The turbine housing you select depends on the manifold design - twinscroll (divided) or singlescroll (undivided). If you are buiding the manifold yourself its a good idea to build a divided T4 manifold pairing cyls 1/4 and 2/3. Also ~30-40% shorter runners than what you are thinking would be a good idea. Bigger cams are a must, especially if you have headwork... the stock cams will not work well with headwork and a big turbo
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:03 AM
  #114  
chuntington101's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
hey chris sorry i wasnt able to post up sooner. Basically the S300V is a somewhat exotic turbo available in a few configurations ranging from 61mm to their 66.7mm with billet ti compressor wheel. The "VTG" housing as they call it is a PWM signal 0-5V and certainly possible to control with most any standalone. The main issue is that it really needs to be run on E85 in order to keep the EGT from overheating the vanepacks. What kind of airflow rates are you looking for and what is the engine spec? The only safe way to use a VNT aka VTG turbo on a gasoline engine's EGT is to use dual BV50's, but thats much more expensive
Thanks for the info geoff. At the moment im just intresed in the turbos. What kind of HP rating would you put on the 61mm and the 66.7mm? how would these compare in spool, size and cost to the same HP capable Garrett turbos?

Cheers

Chris.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:42 AM
  #115  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Originally Posted by ScorpionT
I was never a fan of the BEP rename style, but its easier for most to remember. I dont get the S372 rename either, but I think its because they dont want it confused with the K31 71mm wheel. I think they also call it the S372 because it uses the 83mm turbine rather than the 96mm. Keeps things simple, but its definitely not correct.
So the "s372" that everybody is running on honda-tech is a bep turbo with a considerably smaller turbin wheel than the actual BW version, the sx400-71?

Why does it need to be so confusing lol I just want to go fast!!!

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #116  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by Fathouse
So the "s372" that everybody is running on honda-tech is a bep turbo with a considerably smaller turbin wheel than the actual BW version, the sx400-71?Why does it need to be so confusing lol I just want to go fast!!!
no, the 372 that everyone on honda-tech uses is the identical turbo to the S400SX 71mm. Same turbine wheel, same compressor wheel, same center section, same housing options (42R style or "race" style with the velocity stack in the ported shroud), etc. its just this turbo:





Originally Posted by chuntington101
Thanks for the info geoff. At the moment im just intresed in the turbos. What kind of HP rating would you put on the 61mm and the 66.7mm? how would these compare in spool, size and cost to the same HP capable Garrett turbos?
here are some pics of the S300V, it is a very large turbine and 4" vband outlet:










ill try and post the compressor maps up later tonite
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #117  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Goeff, thanks, it can get a little confusing at times

Is there a advantage to running the race cover, assuming space is not a concern. It is a little larger correct?

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #118  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
the race cover is frickin HUGE. many honda drag racers have claimed to pick up power, but I have not tested it. Generally it is rare to see significant gains from a compressor cover, and the BW guys agree there is likely little if any gains to be had, but it is certainly possible at 45+psi it will pick up top end
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 10:00 AM
  #119  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
the race cover is frickin HUGE. many honda drag racers have claimed to pick up power, but I have not tested it. Generally it is rare to see significant gains from a compressor cover, and the BW guys agree there is likely little if any gains to be had, but it is certainly possible at 45+psi it will pick up top end
Right on, I have heard some pretty crazy claims about the race cover, to good to be true stuff lol. I do like the standard style outlet vs the vband though.

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 03:28 PM
  #120  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by Fathouse
So the "s372" that everybody is running on honda-tech is a bep turbo with a considerably smaller turbin wheel than the actual BW version, the sx400-71?

Why does it need to be so confusing lol I just want to go fast!!!

Fathouse
What Geoff said.

Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
the race cover is frickin HUGE. many honda drag racers have claimed to pick up power, but I have not tested it. Generally it is rare to see significant gains from a compressor cover, and the BW guys agree there is likely little if any gains to be had, but it is certainly possible at 45+psi it will pick up top end
There are some gains, but its nothing insane. If you want to squeeze every bit of power out and dont mind the $300 extra, sure. For the most part, its not necessary or really worth the money.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:33 AM.