anyone have a dyno camparison between the two different cam options.. just seeing if there is any disadvantage of going 280/280.. i know when i had my 9 there was no power loss when g oing with the cossie m3 over the m2. by the specs it looks like the kelford 280/272 is the same as the m3's... mods are in sig as well as my next turbo option..pls dont say search. im aware there are plenty of threads on here about kelford cams. i only saw one thread with a dyno graph but it was a comparison of different brand name cams..

 

im looking for opinions that have dyno graphs to support their statement.

 

I have a pair of kelfords as well, the 272's. I havent installed yet though, thinking whether to go tomei 264 instead, trying to find some info myself.

 

anybody... just trying to figure out if i should get the 280's or 272's

 

kelford 272 are the best

 

^^^ thats what everyone says... but if i go with the 280's what will be the difference.. thats the million dollar question????

 

for your setup in your sig stick to 272 272

 

bump i am also wondering about this setup compared to the cossie m3s

 

For one you will need to use solid lifters. A few in the UK have used the 280/276 and had to use solid lifter even though they are claimed to be for haudralic lifters.