It just doesn't make sense to me, and im trying to figure it out lol. No biggie though. Sorry for all the Qs Mike.

From the testing that's been done the AMS F1-I seems to be the king. I run it and couldn't be more happy with the power my car makes and how it performs out on the street where my car gets ran. I constantly get accused of lying about my cars weight or the power it makes or whats in it etc... But it is what it is

How does the MAP REV 3 power curve look compaired to these 'big' manifold?

So did the V5 get tested or not, I guess Im a little confused, also is Sean testing your manifold Dave (DB)?

this is my ported stock IM vs. Buschur fab. IM on a 2.0 built evo w/mods in my sig on E85 and a "nice/safe" tune....I picked up some pretty solid gains in the mid range and avg. 10+whp up top. I think I would have seen even more with a 280*cam and a touch more displacement...overall I'm happy with the design, look, and performance of the Buschur IM!

I think there is a dynosheet comparing the MAP vs the AMS FI-1 in this very thread.

Its actually a Wilson V2 intake Vs the F1-I that was tested.

Oh sorry I misread...thanks

Engines don't lie... only people do.

Do dynos lie?

Dynos don't lie... PEOPLE DO.

Time is a problem right now, we have to do a turbo test and we can then get back to the manifold stuff. It is very time consuming, changing manifolds, refitting everything perfectly, testing for boost leaks etc.
I guess the magnus cast, Buschur, and Ams vsr would be my choices for further testing.

We will see.................

The Full-Race stock location manifold was tested to be the best/most power, the ported stocker made really good power and is cheaper option...

Wrong manifold...

We are talking intake manifold here, not exhaust.

Thanks