Kelford 272 and stock turbo
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
I'd go with the GSC S1 268/268 grind over the Kelford 264/264. S1 should make a bit more power while retaining the stock valvetrain. I don't mind spending the $$$ to do it right with the 272's but I don't think those cams match the stock turbo powerband...and I don't plan on switching turbos maybe to a EVO IX but doubtful.
Kelford 264's with the stock turbo. The 272 make a lot of power over 7k RPM's, you wont be doing that with the stock turbo. If you look at the AMS shootout, they tested every cam with a 500+WHP GT35R setup. It's not apples to apples.
I have Kelfords 272 and did not make hardly any WHP with the stock 9 turbo. Although, I really fill them working at 6000-8500 RPM's with the FP Red.
I have Kelfords 272 and did not make hardly any WHP with the stock 9 turbo. Although, I really fill them working at 6000-8500 RPM's with the FP Red.
Can somebody explain me about gains in power on stock turbo with anything more than stock cams? As far as i understand the turbo's gona run out of normal compressor map - there is not enough stock turbo to work with 272/11 cams!
havent read the whole thread but there is a thread around here called "big cam little turbo"
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ms+small+turbo
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ms+small+turbo
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
740 Turbo Brick
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Nov 8, 2015 12:24 PM
EVO'D8
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
8
Jul 18, 2012 05:16 PM
Kracka
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
30
Dec 19, 2008 06:06 PM





