wasnt the bbk running 30psi? so its running 4psi more

 

Yes we are still using 1200s right now.. So far they have a little bit of room left before we move up..

Mike

 

yes 4 more Psi actually.. Right now we are working on getting he boost to come up as it doesn't want to raise over 34psi.. Going to play with a couple things now..

Mike

 

whats the torque on the 620 pull?

 

TQ is 550-560...

 

Look's like the turbo is at nearly maximum output. 34psi with the extra displacement should equate to the around the same Lb/min output as around 39-40psi on a 2.0L. What rpm are you seeing peak boost?

 

Holy ****tt! I love it Lookin good Mike........

 

true but id imagine a HIGH compression 2.4 would make the torque up above 600 with the same boost

 

The BBK which is a much smaller turbo in comparison to the FP Black made equal whp/wtq. It stands to reason the Black would make 30-40wtq less then whp even given the displacement. The torque is obviously much higher then it would be on a 2.0L so regardless it's nothing to scoff at.

 

RYU remember these aren't inflated number's like you are use too!

 

How a dyno reads overall has nothing to do with the correlation of whp to wtq output of any given setup. Your obviously rude post is a moot point.

 

I know but this car would be over 700whp and 600wtq "elsewhere"

 

You are the only one here trying to discuss peak number comparison between different dynos. That topic is not even in question. Why you even attempted to bring something petty like that up in an attempt to prove a point in a peak whp to peak wtq discussion of this setup on AWD's dynojet is beyond me....

 

Boost will go up dont worry..

Mike

 

Do you have any way to determine what the shaft speed is? Would certainly prove for some very interesting data. Also, still curious on when your seeing peak boost on this setup. Thanks.