Carbonetics Pro Blade clutch- Mini review
From personal experience I prefer to have the clutch engage in the middle (how mine is setup now). The one on the push/pull mechanism is adjusted almost all the way in and the clutch pedal is adjusted 1/3rd of the way up. I think playing between the two will also alter pedal pressure (maybe) but idk I like it how it is and it doesn't slip even when it gets REALLY cold. Even down to -13*F it hasn't missed a beat.
If you use their push/pull conversion (which I admit looks pretty ghetto....but works) then theres an adjustment on that as well as the clutch pedal adjustment. Both you can play with to get the engagement point where you want it.
From personal experience I prefer to have the clutch engage in the middle (how mine is setup now). The one on the push/pull mechanism is adjusted almost all the way in and the clutch pedal is adjusted 1/3rd of the way up. I think playing between the two will also alter pedal pressure (maybe) but idk I like it how it is and it doesn't slip even when it gets REALLY cold. Even down to -13*F it hasn't missed a beat.
From personal experience I prefer to have the clutch engage in the middle (how mine is setup now). The one on the push/pull mechanism is adjusted almost all the way in and the clutch pedal is adjusted 1/3rd of the way up. I think playing between the two will also alter pedal pressure (maybe) but idk I like it how it is and it doesn't slip even when it gets REALLY cold. Even down to -13*F it hasn't missed a beat.
Have you tried any more adjustments? Does it still slip even when you warm the clutch up? You should also post mileage, number of launches/other abuse, and what the clutch looks like when you pull it out if this is truly the end of your clutch.
I'm at 8k miles, no launches, lots of fast shifting and clutch kicks (fun in the snow
), and generally heavy inner city driving and long distance highway driving. My clutch has no issues other than when DDing now it engages even softer than stock. But will grab hard if I let it out quick.
I'm at 8k miles, no launches, lots of fast shifting and clutch kicks (fun in the snow
), and generally heavy inner city driving and long distance highway driving. My clutch has no issues other than when DDing now it engages even softer than stock. But will grab hard if I let it out quick.
Wow, not many, 1500 max. 12 autocross launch's, zero on the street, maybe 5 at the track. I just had it out and it looked brand new, I was shocked, should outlast the car at this rate.
My previous clutch was an ACT HDSS that I ran from June 2010 to Aug 2011. It had a total of 35000 miles (yes I drive that much, half highway half inner city), 15 road track days, 30 or more decent drag launches at the strip, 1 formal winter tracking day (epic high rpm clutch kicks), and one really botched launch on the street. The last one is what made it start doing the well known lock-out, but when I took it out it was still able to DD without an issue. I demand a lot out of a clutch.
I thought you had more miles than that. I guess at the rate I'm going I'll be the first to find out how long this clutch lasts if 4xforce's 18k isn't the real lifespan. Although now I'm much less confident about launching it given he has problems with his now. Maybe the TOB does make that much of a difference.
My previous clutch was an ACT HDSS that I ran from June 2010 to Aug 2011. It had a total of 35000 miles (yes I drive that much, half highway half inner city), 15 road track days, 30 or more decent drag launches at the strip, 1 formal winter tracking day (epic high rpm clutch kicks), and one really botched launch on the street. The last one is what made it start doing the well known lock-out, but when I took it out it was still able to DD without an issue. I demand a lot out of a clutch.
My previous clutch was an ACT HDSS that I ran from June 2010 to Aug 2011. It had a total of 35000 miles (yes I drive that much, half highway half inner city), 15 road track days, 30 or more decent drag launches at the strip, 1 formal winter tracking day (epic high rpm clutch kicks), and one really botched launch on the street. The last one is what made it start doing the well known lock-out, but when I took it out it was still able to DD without an issue. I demand a lot out of a clutch.

I thought you had more miles than that. I guess at the rate I'm going I'll be the first to find out how long this clutch lasts if 4xforce's 18k isn't the real lifespan. Although now I'm much less confident about launching it given he has problems with his now. Maybe the TOB does make that much of a difference.
My previous clutch was an ACT HDSS that I ran from June 2010 to Aug 2011. It had a total of 35000 miles (yes I drive that much, half highway half inner city), 15 road track days, 30 or more decent drag launches at the strip, 1 formal winter tracking day (epic high rpm clutch kicks), and one really botched launch on the street. The last one is what made it start doing the well known lock-out, but when I took it out it was still able to DD without an issue. I demand a lot out of a clutch.
My previous clutch was an ACT HDSS that I ran from June 2010 to Aug 2011. It had a total of 35000 miles (yes I drive that much, half highway half inner city), 15 road track days, 30 or more decent drag launches at the strip, 1 formal winter tracking day (epic high rpm clutch kicks), and one really botched launch on the street. The last one is what made it start doing the well known lock-out, but when I took it out it was still able to DD without an issue. I demand a lot out of a clutch.

CB (Or anyone else that has an input),
Sorry if this is kind of a newb question, but what would be the advantage of using a hydraulic TOB like the QM unit you use? (Besides not having the Carbonetic conversion contraption)
I'm trying to decide between the Carbonetic Twin kit and the Blade kit for my DD and was going to buy a new slave unit anyway to keep everything fresh but saw your post about using the QM TOB. If there is an advantage to doing a hydraulic TOB I might as well spend my money that way.
Thanks.
Sorry if this is kind of a newb question, but what would be the advantage of using a hydraulic TOB like the QM unit you use? (Besides not having the Carbonetic conversion contraption)
I'm trying to decide between the Carbonetic Twin kit and the Blade kit for my DD and was going to buy a new slave unit anyway to keep everything fresh but saw your post about using the QM TOB. If there is an advantage to doing a hydraulic TOB I might as well spend my money that way.
Thanks.


