Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Contraindications for using Motul gear 300 in 6spd/TC/rear diff?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2015 | 03:20 PM
  #16  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by kaj
can anyone fine zinc and phosphorus content for the 300v?
It's one of the highest. I saw a chart on bob is the oil guy...need to find it...

EDIT: Can't find it at the moment.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2015 | 04:47 PM
  #17  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
It's one of the highest. I saw a chart on bob is the oil guy...need to find it...

EDIT: Can't find it at the moment.
that's the first place i checked. LOL
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2015 | 05:04 PM
  #18  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by kaj
that's the first place i checked. LOL
There was a bar graph breakdown of all the key additives in like 20 different oils, and Motul was near the top in each one. There were a few motorcycle oils with high levels of additives/protectants, but I can't find the damn thread. Grr.

That stupid graph is actually what convinced me to run Motul in my 2.3 when it's done being built.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2015 | 08:38 PM
  #19  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
There was a bar graph breakdown of all the key additives in like 20 different oils, and Motul was near the top in each one. There were a few motorcycle oils with high levels of additives/protectants, but I can't find the damn thread. Grr.

That stupid graph is actually what convinced me to run Motul in my 2.3 when it's done being built.
i'm a long-time Rotella user. the Zn/P are really, really good and i'm happy with it. i found Brad Penn to be not much more, but has even MORE Zn/P. if the Motul is close in price and has similar amounts, i'd consider it. for my setup, i still think Rotella is perfect. BP would just give me a warm, fuzzy feeling LOL.

**edit at the risk of turning this into (another) oil thread LOL:

here's some "expert" info i found. take it or leave it, but the info seems to be the same no matter where i look:

Mobil 1 V twin, zinc--1750 phosp,1600
Amsoil-zinc,1575—phosp 1425
Brad Penn,zinc 1500—phosp 1340-1400
Motul—zinc 1330?-- phosp 1339?
Rotella T6, Zn 1264 ppm--P 1147 ppm

the general consensus is that anything over 1200Zn is best.

FWIW i pretty much only track my car. i very RARELY daily it.

i've concluded Rotella is still a great oil, i may pay a bit more for the Brad Penn. no WAY am i paying the premium for Motul nor Amsoil nor Mobil 1.

Last edited by kaj; Jul 21, 2015 at 08:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 08:54 AM
  #20  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Amsoil isn't that much if you have the "dealer" account. I pay $86 for a case of Zrod 10w30. So its about $20 more than 3 gallons of rotella. I found rotella turns black very quickly when used consistently. And I mean its dirty on the first drive around the block. I'm not fond of that. After running Amsoil I actually had to take the oil pan off because I dropped a valve spring keeper into the motor (many four letter words were said). After having run the Amsoil Zrod for 3-4 oil changes, the bottom end of the motor looked about as clean as new one. I was impressed to say the least because when I was running the rotella, I had the valve cover off at one point, and the head was pretty dirty. I wanted to take a rod cap off, but I read somewhere the stock rod bolts are torque to yield junk, so I left them alone.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 09:52 AM
  #21  
Technical10's Avatar
Newbie
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Transmission oil choices. Motul Gear 300 is great and Redline 75w-140NS works great as well. And yes, I am talking 6-speed and 5-speed gear oil choices. GL-5 is what you want. As for any other brands or concoctions... not interested and cannot provide any input. Between the two, the Redline was smoother shifting for me, yet neither gave me any issues as far as 7500-8500rpm shifting. The only thing you may run into with the Redline is if you run it in really cold weather, and that I am referring to below 0-degrees F, it will be a bit notchier until it warms up. So for the trans, the Motul has a slight advantage.

Transfer case and rear end: Motul 90PA or Redline 80w-140. Again, I have run both and I prefer the Redline. I ran the 90PA for a while and after I depleted what I had, I switched over to all Redline oils because it was easier to find.

I drive on the street and autocross. I am usually in the top 10 for raw time and when the course is right, I have been FTD. I change my gear oil once or twice a year as part of routine maintenance--- I get to see what is in it and so far, it has remained clear. For the $100 it cost to replace oils, it beats a $2500 transmission job and not having the car for 2-months and having to pull the trans which is always a joy

Currently the '05 6-speed has ~1100 autocross runs and about 20k miles on the clock. The transmission ran on Motul Gear 300 and then after a new clutch was installed, Redline went in. That was about 2/3 through those on the Motul and the balance since in Redline. No issues. Transfer case was gone through by TRE and the rear diff is a MaxLock 12-plate.... both done before the first autocross pass. Transmission is still original.

With my 5-speed '03 I also run the redline gear oils as mentioned. To round it out as it seems it has been added, for engine oil I also have run Motul 300V 5w-30 and currently Redline 30WT race oil. Here I prefer the Motul over the Redline, but again I can get Redline easier and it has worked well now for my second season with it.

For reference, I always seem to search out TRE's suggestions...
http://www.teamrip.com/manual_transm...tion_info.html

http://www.teamrip.com/rear_axle_hyp...tion_info.html
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 11:01 AM
  #22  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by kaj
i'm a long-time Rotella user. the Zn/P are really, really good and i'm happy with it. i found Brad Penn to be not much more, but has even MORE Zn/P. if the Motul is close in price and has similar amounts, i'd consider it. for my setup, i still think Rotella is perfect. BP would just give me a warm, fuzzy feeling LOL.

**edit at the risk of turning this into (another) oil thread LOL:

here's some "expert" info i found. take it or leave it, but the info seems to be the same no matter where i look:

Mobil 1 V twin, zinc--1750 phosp,1600
Amsoil-zinc,1575—phosp 1425
Brad Penn,zinc 1500—phosp 1340-1400
Motul—zinc 1330?-- phosp 1339?
Rotella T6, Zn 1264 ppm--P 1147 ppm

the general consensus is that anything over 1200Zn is best.

FWIW i pretty much only track my car. i very RARELY daily it.

i've concluded Rotella is still a great oil, i may pay a bit more for the Brad Penn. no WAY am i paying the premium for Motul nor Amsoil nor Mobil 1.
I'm going to run the Motul in my Evo because it's a built engine. Is Brad Penn a full synthetic? I know that Motul is a super-high grade oil PAO 5? I can't remember, and don't excoriate me if that's wrong. But it's above the grade of Mobil 1, which is a PAO 3 IIRC.

Lots of Subaru guys run Rotella and like it. There was another additive that Motul had that some others didn't, and I can't find that stupid link on the oil guy site
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #23  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Brad Penn is not a synthetic, correct. but i change my oil really often anyway. usually before each event, so i'm not worried about that.
i've been running rotella so long, i honestly can't remember if it's more dirty or clean than other oils LOL
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 05:55 PM
  #24  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by kaj
the general consensus is that anything over 1200Zn is best.
Long term tests conducted by BMW show that 1000 ppm or greater ZDDP content is usually sufficient for engines whose construction renders them sensitive to this EP additive. Your 4G63 however is not one of them, which makes this subject largely academic except for certain FP turbo users.

Originally Posted by Technical10
Transmission oil choices. Motul Gear 300 is great and Redline 75w-140NS works great as well. And yes, I am talking 6-speed and 5-speed gear oil choices. GL-5 is what you want.
To be clear, GL-5 is what you want for gear oil, not for transmission oil. Perhaps this is what you intended(?), but the wording was a little confusing.


Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
Is Brad Penn a full synthetic?
Brad Penn is a conventional oil.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 06:00 PM
  #25  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Ted B
Long term tests conducted by BMW show that 1000 ppm or greater ZDDP content is usually sufficient for engines whose construction renders them sensitive to this EP additive. Your 4G63 however is not one of them, which makes this subject largely academic except for certain FP turbo users. .
just to clarify, that includes the turbo? our engines are the LS1 of four-cylinders, as far as i'm concerned LOL. i just worry about bearing life. actually, i used to be. i have a ball-bearing turbo now.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 06:11 PM
  #26  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Yes, ball bearing turbos aren't an issue. Where ZDDP is important is in engine and turbo designs that employ two steel faces that rub against each other at extreme pressures. This applies mostly to flat tappet valvetrains, chain-driven timing gear in some engines, and steel/steel turbo thrust bearings in FP Red and Black turbos. Our hydraulic roller valvetrains, belt cam drives, and steel/brass or roller bearing turbo setups largely exempt us from requiring much ZDDP in our oils.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 06:47 PM
  #27  
alleggerita's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 7
To my knowledge Brad Penn 20/50 is a semi synthetic. I run it in some historic cars and it performs very well there.

I wouldn't run it in an Evo as I prefer a full synthetic there. I run Shell Rotella 5/40.

Also it appears that Brad Penn is not a good idea with E85.

Originally Posted by Ted B
Brad Penn is a conventional oil.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 07:00 PM
  #28  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by alleggerita
To my knowledge Brad Penn 20/50 is a semi synthetic.
Yes, you are correct.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 07:22 PM
  #29  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Ted B
Yes, ball bearing turbos aren't an issue. Where ZDDP is important is in engine and turbo designs that employ two steel faces that rub against each other at extreme pressures. This applies mostly to flat tappet valvetrains, chain-driven timing gear in some engines, and steel/steel turbo thrust bearings in FP Red and Black turbos. Our hydraulic roller valvetrains, belt cam drives, and steel/brass or roller bearing turbo setups largely exempt us from requiring much ZDDP in our oils.
i'm familiar with the flat tappet issue. i used to use a very high-zinc oil in my Grand National. that's what led me to use it for my turbo cars also. now that i am BB, i'm looking to go with a different oil. if i'm not needing to worry about a crazy amount of zinc, then my options are WIDE open.

Originally Posted by alleggerita
Also it appears that Brad Penn is not a good idea with E85.
any links? i'm curious to know why.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2015 | 07:28 PM
  #30  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by kaj
any links? i'm curious to know why.
http://www.penngrade1.com/CMSFiles/F..._BRAD_PENN.pdf

E85 ready oils employ a phase separation inhibitor that makes them compatible with ethanol, particularly in cold climates. Oils that meet the latest API designation (SN) includes this update. Otherwise, check the manufacturer's website for clarification.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.