Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

CBRD "F1" Evo Manifold... yep different

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 03:59 AM
  #46  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
hey Chad,

Do you use any internal baffles in the intercooler to help spread the air over the core?
Do you see any problems with running the hot charge air into that end tank at 90degrees angle?
Is the inlet in the middle of the intercooler, or at the bottom?

Cheers, Mike
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 06:10 AM
  #47  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by RSMike
hey Chad,

Do you use any internal baffles in the intercooler to help spread the air over the core?
Do you see any problems with running the hot charge air into that end tank at 90degrees angle?
Is the inlet in the middle of the intercooler, or at the bottom?

Cheers, Mike
Mike,

We have done fmic's with baffles and so no measurable gains. These tanks are 100% symmetrical with the inlets and outlets in the middle. No I'll affects from any of the routing and this piping is about 4.5feet shorter than a normal configuration evo!!

Cb
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 08:08 AM
  #48  
Paintballguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by Mikey@Spec-Ops
That is like me looking at the same girl, in the same Maxim magazine, every day and only wishing she was in my bed.

But lets be honest, this manifold is be better than sex!

Mikey
fixed that for you
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 08:22 AM
  #49  
Boostfiend's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Mountain View, California
I think the manifold is cool and all but by adding more length don't you suffer high major loss and with the addition of multiple bends minor losses? How does this perform any better than a regular tubular manifold?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 07:04 AM
  #50  
Graphite_MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: MD
The sound is unique and loss of spool is minimal to none.
Actually the sound is sick and so is the power band. The response off boost is amazing.
I was thinking the same thing but now that I have driven the car I do not agree that it would make a car laggier. Also car will go all the way to 8800 rpm so whatever is lost down low is made up for in mid and high range. But again there does not seem be any loss of spool down low compared to all the 30 r kits which have been tunes at the shop.
;-). Manifold is highly recommended If u like for ur evo to sound like a r1 at 12k
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 07:39 AM
  #51  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by Boostfiend
I think the manifold is cool and all but by adding more length don't you suffer high major loss and with the addition of multiple bends minor losses? How does this perform any better than a regular tubular manifold?
Broader powerband, less backpressure at the head on an endurance road race motor.

Considering the car has a 30r style compressor wheel it's working pretty well to be close to 500whp on our dyno. The car was making 445whp/350wtq at 24psi flat.

Cb
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 08:49 AM
  #52  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Definitely looking forward to the results with 100oct. I bet that will really wake her up!!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 07:48 AM
  #53  
timmiii's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: NJ, NYC, MI
Beautiful work, I'm lovin' it!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 08:10 AM
  #54  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Boostfiend
I think the manifold is cool and all but by adding more length don't you suffer high major loss and with the addition of multiple bends minor losses? How does this perform any better than a regular tubular manifold?
CBRD or the OP will have to post the dyno plot with boost curves to answer the question, but that information does not appear to be forthcoming. From my experience the long runner manifolds flow very well at high rpm and do sound great, but generate additional lag compared to a short tube design. This is not an issue for actual "F1" applications that target usable power bands above 9k rpm. For me personally I would run the manifold because it looks great and would make peak topend power.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 08:41 AM
  #55  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 725
Likes: 13
From: san antonio
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
CBRD or the OP will have to post the dyno plot with boost curves to answer the question, but that information does not appear to be forthcoming. From my experience the long runner manifolds flow very well at high rpm and do sound great, but generate additional lag compared to a short tube design. This is not an issue for actual "F1" applications that target usable power bands above 9k rpm. For me personally I would run the manifold because it looks great and would make peak topend power.
Agreed. The long runner manifolds work great for racing where the rules do not regulate a maximum power output. Also, they are optimized for a specific powerband, 13-20k rpm's in the old f1 days. Boost prior to that is useless, and if your not in the powerband 100% of the time, your not a professional driver.

On the flipside, you have racing series where a max power output is specified. In which case, boost is targeted to come on has hard and as fast as possible. With a 350hp limit in wrc, the cars actually experience a very flat hp curve that hits maximum horsepower at or before 3500 rpm. The torque curve spikes super early and drops off enough to allow the hp to never go above or below 350 all the way to redline.

For a street car, i preffer the latter.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #56  
Mr Evolution's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: NYC
This car will be a lot of fun on the track. I like that you're are able to keep the front bumper support. Nice tires and suspension as well!

Are you using hood pins to secure the hood down?

Would definitely like to see an in car video of it driving on the road and track and watch go flying down the road.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:22 AM
  #57  
Mr Evolution's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Nice work, I am sure the owner will be very satisfied and I am sure it performs as well as it looks!!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #58  
mayberry's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Pine Bush, NY
I'm sure someone has asked you this by now, but why is the car still running stock ignition? You don't think there is anything to be gained from a coil on plug set up?

This is one of those turbo kits that are going to stay around forever. It'll pop up on the forums ten years from now and people will still pay a premium for it.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #59  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by ViNZx_xD
i like intercooler Duct
Dude, let's not quote an entire post worth of pics just to add one non-consequential line.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #60  
aka.ralliart15's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Gator Nation(UF)
Chad, what XR1 muffler model do you have? I actually just made a thread about the muffler that comes In the standard catback because looking at it from the inside it looks restrictive. What are you experiences with Borla Mufflers? I was thinking of switching to a Magnaflow to be honest.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:10 PM.