I didn't know that either.

 

My reason for not liking AN lines. Now, things may have changed with technology BUT...I have seen too many deteriorate over time and actually leak, right through the SS outer coating. This has been on MULTIPLE cars. It's also not a very clean install most of the time. If you do a 3/8" SS line you can actually get it back in the factory fuel line holders and it comes out really nice. Pushing fuel through a single 3/8" line will give you enough fuel flow for over 1200 hp.

 

Do places like Jegs and Summit sell fittings and adapters or are you just flaring the ends and using hose clamps and short pieces of hose to connect to your filter and the fuel rail?

 

At the rail we sell adapters to -6. The line going from the 3/8" line to the rail I made a mandrel and pounded it into the end of the 3/8" line. This didn't flare it, I was scared an actual flare would cut the hose. It put a bulge in the line. I then used the same Multi fuel compatible hose I use on the double pumpers to go over the line, installed a SS Oetiker single eared clamp and on the other end put a -6 straight hose end to go to the fitting on the rail. There are pictures posted on here somewhere in one of the threads about my RS. Fact is, you probably don't need to do anything to your stock lines.

 

would you mind linking me to the proper tools to make the line and a link to the line its self. every time i try to look it up i keep getting braided crap.

 

So your saying there is no need to run the -an Duble pump

 

Looks like even Grainger has the line...and it's cheap...

http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/Tub...CV1?Pid=search

 

With just the double pumper and stock line you can get a lot more fuel. With the double pumper and an upgraded line you can get even more. People are making 700 on stock line and stock fpr with the double pumper, even higher I think I've read...730 if I recall...

 

i thought the I.D. had to be 3/8s

 

Crap...I read that wrong, I thought it was wall thickness of .005 which now makes no sense...that's way too thin

Lemme keep looking

 

Others have already proven what the DW301 does over the W255 and the "modded"-W255...

I took the car to the track wed and ran a 10.51 !!! my best time ever!!! at 30 psi the car did not drop off at all, plenty of fuel, afr stayed dead on at 10.9 at 30psi and 93 fuel.

In comparison, with E85, I would have not even attempted an E85 tune without a big fuel upgrade. A standard Walbro 255 would have run out of fuel at 400whp tops on E85 on our Dyno Dynamics, vs. 470whp as we demonstrated here with the DW300 pump.

We were able to make well over 600whp on E85 on just the single DW300, where a std walbro 255hp limited the car to just over 500hp.

These are just a few examples that have been posted throughout the Internet communities. We've received many reports from our dealers and independents in the Mitsu/Subaru/Import/Domestic/Euro markets trying for the first time. A couple of those examples posted above are from different platforms, but the results were the same. To say that our pump does not produce better results than a W255 is incorrect.

 

Dan check out summit they have a kit for doing it, CMB-03-0081.

 

thank you sir. i will look it up right now.

 

Didnt see anything about the modified wally mentioned in any of those - perhaps you forgot a link?

 

Nope didn't forget a link.

A W255 and a W255 with the relief valve "mod" are going to flow the same until around 80psi.

At that point the flow curves diverge as the W255 with the relief valve in the OE position starts to bleed off pressure until it becomes fully open around 90psi.