Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FP Cast Race Manifold for the 4G63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2013 | 10:10 PM
  #136  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by golgo13
No data.

I asked quite a few questions. None of them were met with anything concrete.
I think that possible improvements will be highly dependent on setup. The challenge with getting more power using an aftermarket exhaust manifold is that the flow resistance of the manifold plays second fiddle to the turbine pressure. About the best that can be expected is that the turbine pressure is no less than half of the boost pressure. For a 33 psi peak boost setup like mine where the lowest turbine pressure I see at WOT is about 25 psi, an exhaust manifold that gets me down to 23 psi isn't going to get me a noticable improvement in power. Back when I was running my BBK at 28 psi tapering to 26 psi, I tested three different manifolds in one day with minimal differences in power. One was stock, one was a 1.25" tubular manifold, and the other was a 1.5" tubular manifold. The power differences were within the scatter of the virtual dyno runs (5 whp).

A lower boost tune, e.g. a 20 psi peak boost tune with a 10 psi turbine pressure might actually see more benefit because the improved efficiency of the manifold might matter more. Or alternatively, an FP Black where the restriction at the turbine is less than my BBK might see more benefit than what I saw.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 04:21 AM
  #137  
AutoXMRIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Near a Beach one of these days
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Maybe I missed it... but NO data?
I'd be interested in what material was used and what it does to spool/power.
Seems like no one here is asking questions.
Originally Posted by golgo13
No data.
I asked quite a few questions. None of them were met with anything concrete.
Originally Posted by AutoXMRIX
I'm not buying prototype until someone personally has tested it. Not from a manufacturer or some sales guy. I want a use case scenario with video of stock evo before and then after.
I asked and here's a response...lol! It's like a manufacturer built a car and just showed you pics and said, you can preorder but no specs. It's better and It's a surprise! LoL! Yeah Yeah, FP's got the reputation...blah blah blah. Show me the car fax!


Originally Posted by Ronnie Size
You must be new here. It's ok, we'll forgive your ignorance.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 05:35 AM
  #138  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Maybe I missed it... but NO data?

I'd be interested in what material was used and what it does to spool/power.

Seems like no one here is asking questions.
quote from FP earlier in the thread:
We don't really focus on arbitrary dyno numbers that can be inflated/deflated at a whim, we focus on stuff that can't lie.

Like back pressure testing and CFD data. In both of these test our manifold has shown to perform better in every conceivable metric. We wouldn't waste out time spending tens of thousands of dollars in tooling and R&D if it wasn't better than a stock ported manifold.

As for what turbo would benefit from this manifold, all the way from Stock to the Black would benefit from it.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Oct 11, 2013 at 01:49 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 07:04 AM
  #139  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
From fp?

Yup oct 4th.. Missed that mysf

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Oct 10, 2013 at 07:06 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 07:17 AM
  #140  
90zcrex's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 275
Likes: 2
From: Columbia, SC
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
We don't really focus on arbitrary dyno numbers that can be inflated/deflated at a whim, we focus on stuff that can't lie.

Like back pressure testing and CFD data. In both of these test our manifold has shown to perform better in every conceivable metric. We wouldn't waste out time spending tens of thousands of dollars in tooling and R&D if it wasn't better than a stock ported manifold.

As for what turbo would benefit from this manifold, all the way from Stock to the Black would benefit from it.
Problem is that their customers base everything off of dyno numbers. If you went to buy a car and they said "We don't focus on gas mileage, we focus on having a free flowing engine with low backpressure and good volumetric efficeincy" Nobody would buy it until they saw some numbers that they can compare too.

FP makes awesome products, it just seems kinda douchey to say "It's awesome, just buy it"
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 08:36 AM
  #141  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
I'm sure someone will throw it on the Dynojet soon. Only takes 5 minutes to swap manifolds after car has cooled down.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 09:25 AM
  #142  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
We don't really focus on arbitrary dyno numbers that can be inflated/deflated at a whim, we focus on stuff that can't lie.

Like back pressure testing and CFD data. In both of these test our manifold has shown to perform better in every conceivable metric. We wouldn't waste out time spending tens of thousands of dollars in tooling and R&D if it wasn't better than a stock ported manifold.

As for what turbo would benefit from this manifold, all the way from Stock to the Black would benefit from it.
CFD is only as good as it's inputs... garbage in garbage out. back pressure just tells you back pressure, it doesn't tell you dyno numbers. We didn't get CFD or Backpressure data... OR dyno plots. We got a picture of a part that fits on the car.

Can you prove to me that it's better than a stock ported manifold? How can you say that when you don't have ANY data. NONE. Don't try and bull**** me Jerry.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 09:32 AM
  #143  
ihockey1's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151000274951780

Last edited by ihockey1; Oct 10, 2013 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 08:13 AM
  #144  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
So this does not work for the 8, and does not have twin scroll?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 08:41 AM
  #145  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
what... it is twin scroll and will work with an 8...
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 01:48 PM
  #146  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
CFD is only as good as it's inputs... garbage in garbage out. back pressure just tells you back pressure, it doesn't tell you dyno numbers. We didn't get CFD or Backpressure data... OR dyno plots. We got a picture of a part that fits on the car.

Can you prove to me that it's better than a stock ported manifold? How can you say that when you don't have ANY data. NONE. Don't try and bull**** me Jerry.
easy, this was a quote from FP earlier in the thread. sorry I should have stated that
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 02:16 PM
  #147  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
CFD is only as good as it's inputs... garbage in garbage out.
Steady State flow analysis likely means VERY LITTLE. But I'm an FP Fanboy and would put my money on it working better then the OEM manifold.

Would I replace a perfectly good factory manifold with one? Probably not. But if I wanted to go back to a stock frame setup or if I had a cracked stock one, I'd buy this before I picked up a used stocker.

I'd also go this way before I did a stock frame welded pipe manifold. "Stock Framed" is already a comprimise, might as well maintain the heat shields and (likely) higher reliability of a cast piece.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Oct 15, 2013 at 02:19 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 03:52 PM
  #148  
CBRE's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Damn if I still had an Evo I would be all over this, if it work half as good as their DSM cast manifold they have a winner.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 04:01 PM
  #149  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
I got in on the group buy and am now selling my CBRE ported manifold.

(Yes, that was a shameless plug, but I won't link it here)



We'll see how this does!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #150  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
^^^ NO CROSSTHREADING!!!!! shameless plug
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:59 PM.