Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FIC 1650cc injectors idling rich on 93 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2017 | 02:18 PM
  #16  
RightSaid fred's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 714
Likes: 22
From: in a garage
I'm just repeating it for the benefit of those who are a bit slow on the uptake.


What's the point in looking for new problems to fix when you don't want to try to fix the already obvious problems.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2017 | 03:12 PM
  #17  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
If the primary pump is on the stock wiring (not hardwired) fuel pressure at idle is not the issue (for a rich condition anyways). If it's hardwired, that's a different story.


As far as the PW linearization table superceding MIN IPW patch. They are two different things. One is PW adder based on commanded pulse width to, literally, make the injector's flow linear at low pulse width. The other (MIN IPW patch) allows you to alter the how low of an IPW the ECU can command. At least that's how I understand it.


FWIW, my car idles fine on pump gas without messing with the IPW linearization.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2017 | 05:49 PM
  #18  
2winscroll's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 816
Likes: 82
From: wisconsin
Read post 218

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...um-ipw-15.html

As for Fred well it's Fred. People increase their fuel pressure all the time to get more flow out of the injectors. It's not a bad/wrong thing to do, it's just with large injectors it becomes hard to get the air fuel lean at idle. Low boost or N/A cars sometimes run 60-70 psi base pressure.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 07:03 AM
  #19  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by 2winscroll
Read post 218

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...um-ipw-15.html

As for Fred well it's Fred. People increase their fuel pressure all the time to get more flow out of the injectors. It's not a bad/wrong thing to do, it's just with large injectors it becomes hard to get the air fuel lean at idle. Low boost or N/A cars sometimes run 60-70 psi base pressure.
218 says the min IPW patch only helps at idle, where as the IPW linearization helps at through the entire range of pulse where the injector is non-linear.


I agree, that the IPW linearization does more. But I don't think it replaces the min IPW patch. Because if MIN IPW is 1.5ms, that's all you get, even if you need .8ms...
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 07:44 AM
  #20  
2winscroll's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 816
Likes: 82
From: wisconsin
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
218 says the min IPW patch only helps at idle, where as the IPW linearization helps at through the entire range of pulse where the injector is non-linear.


I agree, that the IPW linearization does more. But I don't think it replaces the min IPW patch. Because if MIN IPW is 1.5ms, that's all you get, even if you need .8ms...
You may be right, my roms have both patches applied and I run my IPW min at .906 I believe. Although it never really gets that low. Probably should go ahead and do both patches to be sure. I just left everything because it worked.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 07:47 AM
  #21  
2winscroll's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 816
Likes: 82
From: wisconsin
In post 216 Fred says this;
Its probably not what you want to hear, but the minimum IPW patch is totally unnecessary if the injectors are tuned properly. In fact the minumum IPW is a complete kluge for when we had no idea about partial opening injector response. See my thread on 2150 settings.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 07:56 AM
  #22  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Ok, I think I see what he means now.


By tuning the linearization table, you don't need to lower the min IPW because you are able to get fueling in line with commanded pulse width.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 05:36 PM
  #23  
silverflyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 19
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by 2winscroll
You should see 35-37 psi at idle with the vacuum line connected depending on how big your cams are. Once you start getting over 39-40 at idle it will be harder to tune. i drill the siphon on double Pumpers no matter what the fuel pressure at idle is because it helps with the rich afr when the second pump kicks on.

No it will not require a full retune, just idle and part throttle areas of the map. If you drill the siphon then you may need to touch up afr's up top also.

One thing that can help also is to turn down the timing in the rich idle areas. This will load the motor down some at idle. It in turn will require more fuel to idle. Bump it down around 5-7 degrees.

This is a lot of screwing around so treat your tuner well and he will get it ciphered out I'm sure.

Mr Freds post has settings that are very close, so start with his latencys and linearization settings.


I checked the fuel pressure at idle today. It was around 38 psi.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 07:20 PM
  #24  
RightSaid fred's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 714
Likes: 22
From: in a garage
Originally Posted by silverflyer
I checked the fuel pressure at idle today. It was around 38 psi.
Yes, 5 PSI too high.
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone

Don't listen to Fred. Your car will idle at stoich. .
Check it again but this time turn on all your lights and fans....report back.

Also take a note of the manifold vac .

It's the difference between manifold vac and gauge pressure which is the base pressure which should be constant (3 bar) and NEVER deviate.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 09:57 PM
  #25  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Ok, I think I see what he means now.


By tuning the linearization table, you don't need to lower the min IPW because you are able to get fueling in line with commanded pulse width.
I think you guys are confusing two different things. The Linearization tables will allow the ecu to generate the correct pulse width for your injectors in their non linear region, but if that correct pulse width is below the Min Injector pulse width setting then the ecu cannot send a pulse width that small. Which is why you would need to lower Min IPW if you happen to fall in that range.

Or maybe I just skimmed through this thread and you guys arent talking about what i think you are.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 10:56 PM
  #26  
2winscroll's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 816
Likes: 82
From: wisconsin
38psi That's about what I expected it's usually 2-3 pounds higher than stock pump. No big deal if you drill the siphon I bet it drops 2-3 psi. This will bring you up .5 afr not a lot. If you tuner does the mods in the 1650 thread, linearization table. The min IPW too just set it around .900, then tune the afr around 13.5-14.5 it should start to run poorly any leaner due to injectiors response time. Back the afr down a .5 point and it's smooth as a baby's bottom. Keep you idle timing around 12 degrees.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2017 | 11:29 PM
  #27  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Biggiesacks
I think you guys are confusing two different things. The Linearization tables will allow the ecu to generate the correct pulse width for your injectors in their non linear region, but if that correct pulse width is below the Min Injector pulse width setting then the ecu cannot send a pulse width that small. Which is why you would need to lower Min IPW if you happen to fall in that range.

Or maybe I just skimmed through this thread and you guys arent talking about what i think you are.
That's exactly how I understood actually...
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 08:25 AM
  #28  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
my bad, I should read the whole thing before posting.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2017 | 01:00 AM
  #29  
4b11slayer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 89
From: Santa Ana
Have you guys tried leaning it out with MAP Ve or Rpm VE?

How about leaning out globally (scaling) and retuning non idle areas?

Is it only rich at idle?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2017 | 01:57 AM
  #30  
mines5's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 870
Likes: 23
From: Streets of willow
Originally Posted by Biggiesacks
I think you guys are confusing two different things. The Linearization tables will allow the ecu to generate the correct pulse width for your injectors in their non linear region, but if that correct pulse width is below the Min Injector pulse width setting then the ecu cannot send a pulse width that small. Which is why you would need to lower Min IPW if you happen to fall in that range.

Or maybe I just skimmed through this thread and you guys arent talking about what i think you are.
What i understand is that IPW linearization patch works to give you consistant PWs in
the non linear region.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 PM.