Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FIC 1650cc injectors idling rich on 93 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2017, 02:29 PM
  #61  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by RightSaid fred
If the trims are left off then you won't have lambda 1 at idle and low load, you 'll have excessive fuel consumption and excessive emissions.
And a pig to drive.

The point of having the trim's off when tuning is to be able to more quickly dial in the base map, without having the trims effect your adjustments. You just look at the wideband and make adjustments based on that. Last my car was tuned from a base map, it was completely in open loop the first 2-3 ROM revisions.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 03:43 PM
  #62  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by RightSaid fred
If the trims are left off then you won't have lambda 1 at idle and low load, you 'll have excessive fuel consumption and excessive emissions.
And a pig to drive.
You my friend know absolutely nothing about tuning, and should refrain from commenting.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 04:10 PM
  #63  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Fuel trims exist because of differences in the specific gravity of fuel more or less.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 04:15 PM
  #64  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by 2winscroll
Fuel trims exist because of differences in the specific gravity of fuel more or less.
And variances in engines in a mass production environment where each one isn't getting a "custom" tune, and they will all vary a bit.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 05:37 PM
  #65  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
silverflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 157
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by 2winscroll
Increased fuel pressure down low causes the injectors to react faster. If you were operating right on the edge of minimum pulse width, an increase in fuel pressure could give these results. Another scenario would be you actually were having a lean missfire and this will fool your O2 sensor into thinking you are rich.

It's not you fuel trims because they should have been able to lean the engine out easier with less fuel pressure.

Every tuner knows to turn off the trims while tuning. Fred is not a tuner and needs to stop posting in the tuning threads. Everybody's an expert just ask them.

The lean misfire scenario is an interesting one. The car was much richer months ago when we started with the base rom though (about 10.8 AFR). I fixed a leak in the throttle seals and we leaned the car out. It's now sitting at an average of 13.2 AFR. The car mostly runs smooth though. Maybe the occasional burble here or there, but it's on S2 cams.

The car is running open loop. No fuel trims.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 06:37 PM
  #66  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
silverflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 157
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Here are some videos:

Base tune (first start) startup from back in April 10.8 AFR

Here is one from June. 13.2 AFR

I didn't take a video since drilling out the siphon. I will post some more up to date videos when I can.
Old Aug 9, 2017, 07:54 PM
  #67  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by silverflyer
The lean misfire scenario is an interesting one. The car was much richer months ago when we started with the base rom though (about 10.8 AFR). I fixed a leak in the throttle seals and we leaned the car out. It's now sitting at an average of 13.2 AFR. The car mostly runs smooth though. Maybe the occasional burble here or there, but it's on S2 cams.

The car is running open loop. No fuel trims.
My bad a lean misfire will cause you afr readings to go leaner. Sorry I got that mixed up.

What happens if you try to lean it out more? Do AFR's start to get unstable?
Old Aug 9, 2017, 11:29 PM
  #68  
Account Disabled
 
RightSaid fred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: in a garage
Posts: 714
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by 2winscroll
Increased fuel pressure down low causes the injectors to react faster. If you were operating right on the edge of minimum pulse width, an increase in fuel pressure could give these results. Another scenario would be you actually were having a lean missfire and this will fool your O2 sensor into thinking you are rich.

It's not you fuel trims because they should have been able to lean the engine out easier with less fuel pressure.

Every tuner knows to turn off the trims while tuning. Fred is not a tuner and needs to stop posting in the tuning threads. Everybody's an expert just ask them.

You actually got that all back to front.

Increased fuel pressure makes the injectors slower to open.
That's because they open against fuel pressure.
Because increased pressure makes them slower to open (actual PW is less than commanded PW), you need to adjust the dead time so they open longer........but only at low load, which of course you can't do.
But not only that, the minimum usable PW is also greater, so your minimum idle speed is a bit more, otherwise it'll stall due to injectors not able to open with the required short PWs.


Obviously by giving out false info.........you're NOT a tuner. Just another wannabe.

Last edited by RightSaid fred; Aug 9, 2017 at 11:34 PM.
Old Aug 10, 2017, 01:50 AM
  #69  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by RightSaid fred
You actually got that all back to front.

Increased fuel pressure makes the injectors slower to open.
That's because they open against fuel pressure.
Because increased pressure makes them slower to open (actual PW is less than commanded PW), you need to adjust the dead time so they open longer........but only at low load, which of course you can't do.
But not only that, the minimum usable PW is also greater, so your minimum idle speed is a bit more, otherwise it'll stall due to injectors not able to open with the required short PWs.


Obviously by giving out false info.........you're NOT a tuner. Just another wannabe.
Can you post a log of this actual or close enough scenario that you explained ?
Old Aug 10, 2017, 03:30 AM
  #70  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by RightSaid fred
You actually got that all back to front.

Increased fuel pressure makes the injectors slower to open.
That's because they open against fuel pressure.
Because increased pressure makes them slower to open (actual PW is less than commanded PW), you need to adjust the dead time so they open longer........but only at low load, which of course you can't do.
But not only that, the minimum usable PW is also greater, so your minimum idle speed is a bit more, otherwise it'll stall due to injectors not able to open with the required short PWs.


Obviously by giving out false info.........you're NOT a tuner. Just another wannabe.
Wholly crap batman! Your right about latency needing to be higher with increased fuel pressure. What I was trying to say is the bounce, non linear crazy reaction your injectors have at low pulse widths, can be more pronounced when fuel pressure drops. He is operating right at the edge of the minimum pulse width of the injectors, then a drop in pressure at the rail can put him right on the bounce of the injectors, then yes he could actually go rich from a drop in fuel pressure.

Not trying to give out false info sorry but you do the **** all the time.

Not a tuner? How many cars have you tuned over 800hp? Over 500hp? Over 350hp?
Let me help you out..none...none....none.
Old Aug 10, 2017, 05:14 AM
  #71  
EvoM Community Team Leader
 
Biggiesacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,688
Received 704 Likes on 592 Posts
fuel pressure is love, fuel pressure is life.
Old Aug 10, 2017, 05:30 AM
  #72  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
What is the purpose of posting information which you can't back up or atleast present a sample with proper example.

If information is correct but has ambiguity , how one can understand that ?
Old Aug 10, 2017, 06:07 AM
  #73  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by silverflyer
Here are some videos:

Base tune (first start) startup from back in April 10.8 AFR
https://youtu.be/IiSKpgQFNj4

Here is one from June. 13.2 AFR
https://youtu.be/I4xgyljBDRw

I didn't take a video since drilling out the siphon. I will post some more up to date videos when I can.
Ok watch the second video.
The AFR's are pretty solid. Flyer has told me that if he tries to lean out the idle any further AFR's start to jump around. Crazy variation all over the place. This tells me that he's starting to run at the very minimum IPW the injectors can run at. 1650's on gas with the siphon drilled 14:1 is about as good as it gets unless you drop your idle timing way down to load the engine more. The only time I would bother doing that was if I was going to run in closed loop so I could get the car to idle at 14.7. Race vehicles run all the time with an idle richer than that. With no catalytic converter it's just fine, and will run cooler at idle. Pulling timing to get the AFR's leaner will not save you any fuel because the motor is just running less efficient and requires more fuel, that's why you are able to get it to idle at a higher A/F ratio.

IMO the idle tune is very close. But please if you are an experienced tuner chime in and tell the Flyer your opinions.

Cheers, 2win
Old Aug 10, 2017, 06:29 AM
  #74  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I'd have to see what my timing at idle is, but my car idles fine at stoich, in both open and closed loop, on pump gas. I don't have my lap top with me at work. IIRC its 8*. Too much temperature swing here in Vegas (can be as much as 40* in a 24hr period between night/day/night), and I take the car out of town a lot, so I didn't want to do deal with an open loop idle and inconsistent AFR. So, I'm not sure what you mean by "way" down. My car also hasn't run pump gas in over 2 years, so it makes it hard to remember little things like idle timing
Old Aug 10, 2017, 10:25 PM
  #75  
Account Disabled
 
RightSaid fred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: in a garage
Posts: 714
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by mines5
What is the purpose of posting information which you can't back up or atleast present a sample with proper example.

If information is correct but has ambiguity , how one can understand that ?

Not sure what you mean by that?
If you're wondering about data from fuel pressure vs opening times, closing times vs flow vs minimum usable PW then you get your own data from doing an injector flow test on an injector test bench.


If you don't have one, they're very easy to make yourself.....like mine.

Then you've got more of an idea as to what's going on.
Unlike others here who have an opinion and nothing else.


Quick Reply: FIC 1650cc injectors idling rich on 93 octane



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 AM.