FIRST EVO IX TUNED WITH SAFC2......21psi.....pump gas
With the advent of the increased ecu capacity and functions in the Evo IX ecu the use of piggy back type devices - particularly those which do not independantly control knock - becomes more and more hap hazzard and half assed (IMHO)
The new IX ecu is a technogical power house with huge potential, it needs an appropraite tuning tool to adjust it in a effective manner
The new IX ecu is a technogical power house with huge potential, it needs an appropraite tuning tool to adjust it in a effective manner
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Since some cars with cams and TBE and SAFC have dynoed around 315ish on that dyno, those numbers are good. This board is full of ninnies who have no life and are looking for an excuse to vent their frustrations. DO you really think this Evo baselined at 280/250? I mean, come on. Those are good numbers along with the Precision Dyno UTEC results. The question becomes what will the cam options be for the MIVEC engine.
It is a superior flashing program. Not a piggyback.
Also Let me also say that not every flash program is NOTcreated equal. That is why we chose the EcuTek.
I have seen plenty of people make good power with an AFC for many years.
On a side note everyone should keep in mind, that on this particular ECU the 9 has, THE FULL POTENTIAL of the car will not be seen with an AFC. Please I am not bashing it, just speaking from proffesional expertise.
Also let me say that I specifically did not bash anyone. Everyone has their preferences. This is a great car that can benefit from any type of EMS. I mention that in post on page 1. I hope everyone keeps up the good work
My two cents.
Last edited by Precision Dyno; Oct 22, 2005 at 07:03 PM.
About half of this was useless arguing about who is a prck and the best tuning tools.
I don't give a rats *ss what number the thing put up. I want to see a baseline chart vs, tuned chart. Jesus, the switzer dyno said the 9 made @290 whp. It's just a number. I want to see gains over stock. This thread is useless without a baseline graph. Do you have one or not?
I don't give a rats *ss what number the thing put up. I want to see a baseline chart vs, tuned chart. Jesus, the switzer dyno said the 9 made @290 whp. It's just a number. I want to see gains over stock. This thread is useless without a baseline graph. Do you have one or not?
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Hey bud, Sorry but I have to fix your post. We tuned our 9 on EcuTek. NOT UTEC.
It is a superior flashing program. Not a piggyback.
Also Let me also say that not every flash program is created equal. That is why we chose the EcuTek.
I have seen plenty of people make good power with an AFC for many years.
On a side note everyone should keep in mind, that on this particular ECU the 9 has, THE FULL POTENTIAL of the car will not be seen with an AFC. Please I am not bashing it, just speaking from proffesional expertise.
Also let me say that I specifically did not bash anyone. Everyone has their preferences. This is a great car that can benefit from any type of EMS. I mention that in post on page 1. I hope everyone keeps up the good work
My two cents.
It is a superior flashing program. Not a piggyback.
Also Let me also say that not every flash program is created equal. That is why we chose the EcuTek.
I have seen plenty of people make good power with an AFC for many years.
On a side note everyone should keep in mind, that on this particular ECU the 9 has, THE FULL POTENTIAL of the car will not be seen with an AFC. Please I am not bashing it, just speaking from proffesional expertise.
Also let me say that I specifically did not bash anyone. Everyone has their preferences. This is a great car that can benefit from any type of EMS. I mention that in post on page 1. I hope everyone keeps up the good work
My two cents.
Originally Posted by SiCKlEyWiKeD
totally agree. The afc is a good quick tool to get a little more power out of you car. I would love to get a flash but personally here in vegas I haven't seen a proper one yet. Granted the only one I've seen is Dynoflash on some of the Vegas guys. The results made me bitter of flashes all together. Maybe getting flashed on a dyno rather than the street would help.
We will be at SEMA next week if you would like to stop by and talk. If you have any questions or to shoot the **** stop by the EcuTek Booth.
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Let me edit something. In my post I said something wrong so I edited it forgive me. ALL flashes are NOT created equal.
We will be at SEMA next week if you would like to stop by and talk. If you have any questions or to shoot the **** stop by the EcuTek Booth.
We will be at SEMA next week if you would like to stop by and talk. If you have any questions or to shoot the **** stop by the EcuTek Booth.
Originally Posted by hotrod2448
About half of this was useless arguing about who is a prck and the best tuning tools.
I don't give a rats *ss what number the thing put up. I want to see a baseline chart vs, tuned chart. Jesus, the switzer dyno said the 9 made @290 whp. It's just a number. I want to see gains over stock. This thread is useless without a baseline graph. Do you have one or not?
I don't give a rats *ss what number the thing put up. I want to see a baseline chart vs, tuned chart. Jesus, the switzer dyno said the 9 made @290 whp. It's just a number. I want to see gains over stock. This thread is useless without a baseline graph. Do you have one or not?
SAFC without a reflash screws up you timing down low. You will usually be running a few degrees lower timing around 3-5k RPM.
The stock ECU determines load by your MAF Hz (AIR going thru the MAF). A SAFC lowers the amount of of Hz the ECU see's so it can deliver less fuel to the engine. The stock ECU however will determine load by how much Hz (AIR) is going into the engine. Since your altering that signal the ECU will then adjust timing to a lower load point. You can make good numbers up top but down low the numbers are no very impressive.
The stock ECU determines load by your MAF Hz (AIR going thru the MAF). A SAFC lowers the amount of of Hz the ECU see's so it can deliver less fuel to the engine. The stock ECU however will determine load by how much Hz (AIR) is going into the engine. Since your altering that signal the ECU will then adjust timing to a lower load point. You can make good numbers up top but down low the numbers are no very impressive.
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Hey bud, Sorry but I have to fix your post. We tuned our 9 on EcuTek. NOT UTEC.
Anyway, I'm sure you guys will see a baseline from TT in the near future. But come on, the SAFC is a nice simple alternative for some. While it might not be "superior," it's basic and straightforward. And good just to see some quick numbers. And my original point about the baseline is that plenty of cars have baselined around the 225 mark IIRC on TT's dyno. Switzer also has the same dyno that gave very high numbers for the WR equipped car. Personally, my XEDE equiped car put down 306, 306 on the TT dyno so I'm thinking the IX number is pretty good.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Sorry. I meant EcuTek.
Anyway, I'm sure you guys will see a baseline from TT in the near future. But come on, the SAFC is a nice simple alternative for some. While it might not be "superior," it's basic and straightforward. And good just to see some quick numbers. And my original point about the baseline is that plenty of cars have baselined around the 225 mark IIRC on TT's dyno. Switzer also has the same dyno that gave very high numbers for the WR equipped car. Personally, my XEDE equiped car put down 306, 306 on the TT dyno so I'm thinking the IX number is pretty good.
Anyway, I'm sure you guys will see a baseline from TT in the near future. But come on, the SAFC is a nice simple alternative for some. While it might not be "superior," it's basic and straightforward. And good just to see some quick numbers. And my original point about the baseline is that plenty of cars have baselined around the 225 mark IIRC on TT's dyno. Switzer also has the same dyno that gave very high numbers for the WR equipped car. Personally, my XEDE equiped car put down 306, 306 on the TT dyno so I'm thinking the IX number is pretty good.
The EcuTek comment was toward any other flashing program on the market.
In conclusion I agree with your post.
First vboy425 has earned himself a couple days off from the forum for his inability to follow the rules.
Second, this thread is marginal in the first place since TT is not a vendor on this site so all the people propping them are only moving this thread closer to deletion. It's okay for them to post the thread about the car but if it becomes a "sell" then the thread will be removed since they do not pay to advertise on this site.
Second, this thread is marginal in the first place since TT is not a vendor on this site so all the people propping them are only moving this thread closer to deletion. It's okay for them to post the thread about the car but if it becomes a "sell" then the thread will be removed since they do not pay to advertise on this site.
Originally Posted by 20valves20lbs
DUDE WTF ARE YOU BABBLING ABOUT THOSE BEING INACCURATE NUMBERS??????
Your e-knowledge is failing you terribly right now. Dont comment on things u know nothing about.
Setting the smoothing at 0 gives real unaltered data.....its the other way around that is more misleading if anything because you are smoothing out the graph to bring the peaks and troughs together.
Where do people come up with this crap? The thread is worth a lot to those who want to compare same mods on the 8 and 9 and see the outcome.
Your e-knowledge is failing you terribly right now. Dont comment on things u know nothing about.
Setting the smoothing at 0 gives real unaltered data.....its the other way around that is more misleading if anything because you are smoothing out the graph to bring the peaks and troughs together.
Where do people come up with this crap? The thread is worth a lot to those who want to compare same mods on the 8 and 9 and see the outcome.
regardless, anyone can set smoothing at 0 and get peaky crap numbers like you did. But everyone (except you for some odd reason) doesnt do that. Wonder why. this thred is worthless, and so are your numbers.
Originally Posted by timzcat
First vboy425 has earned himself a couple days off from the forum for his inability to follow the rules.
Second, this thread is marginal in the first place since TT is not a vendor on this site so all the people propping them are only moving this thread closer to deletion. It's okay for them to post the thread about the car but if it becomes a "sell" then the thread will be removed since they do not pay to advertise on this site.
Second, this thread is marginal in the first place since TT is not a vendor on this site so all the people propping them are only moving this thread closer to deletion. It's okay for them to post the thread about the car but if it becomes a "sell" then the thread will be removed since they do not pay to advertise on this site.
Originally Posted by EvilDylan
LOL @ you thinking the motor is spiking 10 hp here and there. smoothing is set to correct the dyno measurement's numbers, not the engines power. Do you feel your car bucking up and down when you accelerate? Probably not unless you have a problem, so those spikes are an inaccurate representation of actual output.
regardless, anyone can set smoothing at 0 and get peaky crap numbers like you did. But everyone (except you for some odd reason) doesnt do that. Wonder why. this thred is worthless, and so are your numbers.
regardless, anyone can set smoothing at 0 and get peaky crap numbers like you did. But everyone (except you for some odd reason) doesnt do that. Wonder why. this thred is worthless, and so are your numbers.



