Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

FIRST EVO IX TUNED WITH SAFC2......21psi.....pump gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #61  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Too many naysayers on here with no information to back up what there saying.
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #62  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by joeymia
SAFC without a reflash screws up you timing down low. You will usually be running a few degrees lower timing around 3-5k RPM.

The stock ECU determines load by your MAF Hz (AIR going thru the MAF). A SAFC lowers the amount of of Hz the ECU see's so it can deliver less fuel to the engine. The stock ECU however will determine load by how much Hz (AIR) is going into the engine. Since your altering that signal the ECU will then adjust timing to a lower load point. You can make good numbers up top but down low the numbers are no very impressive.
You have 2/3 of the process correct

Missing the last 1/3

Where the lower Hz results in the ecu running in the lower load areas of the ignition map and then using the overly advanced timing of that area

The result is knock - then the ecu pulls the timing which leaves you with the low timing or zero timing in the mid range

Hardly an optimal way to set things up

My flash tunes on 91 octane are tuned to avoid knock 100% and not pull any timing on the fuel used. While this may yield less power than a single dyno run done with a safc, the more conservative tuning results in a smoother and safer power band.

There are no absolutes in tuning - mostly compromise and trade off.

In any event - all discussions of SFC vs. Flash from the Evo VIII are now mute as the IX has taken the factory ecu in a direction which renders the safc outdated and obsolite

PS - as to the comments above - a ecutek flash licsense costs a ecutek dealer more than a SAFC
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #63  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
You have 2/3 of the process correct

Missing the last 1/3

Where the lower Hz results in the ecu running in the lower load areas of the ignition map and then using the overly advanced timing of that area

The result is knock - then the ecu pulls the timing which leaves you with the low timing or zero timing in the mid range

Hardly an optimal way to set things up

My flash tunes on 91 octane are tuned to avoid knock 100% and not pull any timing on the fuel used. While this may yield less power than a single dyno run done with a safc, the more conservative tuning results in a smoother and safer power band.

There are no absolutes in tuning - mostly compromise and trade off.

In any event - all discussions of SFC vs. Flash from the Evo VIII are now mute as the IX has taken the factory ecu in a direction which renders the safc outdated and obsolite

PS - as to the comments above - a ecutek flash licsense costs a ecutek dealer more than a SAFC
How so....?
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #64  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by gonzo
How so....?
There are now SIX (6) seperate ingition maps which it constantly switches around depending on conditions as well as TWO (2) main fuel maps and even more correction maps working in the back ground than ever

Also - the ability to adjust and control the cam timing will become critical once exhasuts are changed

I really do not want to dwell on the subject here

As with most things, time will tell
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #65  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by timzcat
First vboy425 has earned himself a couple days off from the forum for his inability to follow the rules.
Second, this thread is marginal in the first place since TT is not a vendor on this site so all the people propping them are only moving this thread closer to deletion. It's okay for them to post the thread about the car but if it becomes a "sell" then the thread will be removed since they do not pay to advertise on this site.
Timzcat,


I think you're reading things a little wrong, and please correct me if I'm wrong.

1) This started out as a purely informational thread about the IX, not TT or their tuning ability.

2) After people cam out with negative comments about "the numbers" (par for the course on this board a la the WR) some of us vouched for the fact TT knows what they're doing, not to sell them in anyway. If you want that, go to SoCalEvo.net.

3) Once again, Al demonstates his inability to refrain from badmouthing, however apparently that's tolerated since he is a vendor. If that's true, tell you what...I'll pay to advertise here strictly for the purpose of that privilege.

4) Why does almost every thread devolve into a pissing/groaning/I know more than you/your tuning abilities suck/your tuning equipment or device sucks? I'd say there are some usual suspects here (Shiv, DB, and Al, although not always their fault...they are provoked). THAT is a problem.


Anyway, I still think the question with the IX is how will it handle cams? Or will cams even be compatable with MIVEC? BTW, props to Precision Dyno for not throwing mud. Some vendors could learn a lesson or three.
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #66  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Actually cams on the intake side will do almost nothing. Also I don't think they will be cheap if they are produced. It would be interesting to see the effect on the exhaust side.
I wouldn't go larger than 272 if that but much more lift like on the revolver, piper cam profiles advertised.
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #67  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Timzcat,


I think you're reading things a little wrong, and please correct me if I'm wrong.

1) This started out as a purely informational thread about the IX, not TT or their tuning ability.

2) After people cam out with negative comments about "the numbers" (par for the course on this board a la the WR) some of us vouched for the fact TT knows what they're doing, not to sell them in anyway. If you want that, go to SoCalEvo.net.

3) Once again, Al demonstates his inability to refrain from badmouthing, however apparently that's tolerated since he is a vendor. If that's true, tell you what...I'll pay to advertise here strictly for the purpose of that privilege.

4) Why does almost every thread devolve into a pissing/groaning/I know more than you/your tuning abilities suck/your tuning equipment or device sucks? I'd say there are some usual suspects here (Shiv, DB, and Al, although not always their fault...they are provoked). THAT is a problem.


Anyway, I still think the question with the IX is how will it handle cams? Or will cams even be compatable with MIVEC? BTW, props to Precision Dyno for not throwing mud. Some vendors could learn a lesson or three.
Everything you say here is true. Especially the section I highlighted. I will never buy his product ever. Just because of how dirty he did some of Vegas EVO owners.

If anybody is trying to make a "sale", like our supposed supermod says, its Al. He goes into threads to bash a product just to make his product look better. If anything, that should be grounds for instant banning.

Last edited by gonzo; Oct 23, 2005 at 12:59 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #68  
saywhen's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire (Running Springs)
^^^ +1
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #69  
dsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Kailua, HI
word!
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #70  
Gevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dsevo
word!
^^^^+1
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #71  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Hey, lets change the name of this thread so no one accidentally stumbles across it thinking it would actually contain any useful information.

I think "Tuners being unprofessional and acting like children" or "SAFC vs. Reflash, The final battle" would be an excellent title.

Please Please delete this steaming pile of crap this thread has turned into.
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #72  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
Originally Posted by saywhen
^^^ +1
Originally Posted by dsevo
word!
Originally Posted by Gevo
^^^^+1

Thank you for your well thought out contribution to our thread. Sit on your hands next time if you have nothing to say. Thread closed.

Speedlimit....
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #73  
blonde's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
ok, since this thread is now completly useless (we don't have the original post anymore) and all we have now is just a bunch of arguing and a big pissing match, this thread is now closed.

it is just a shame that this forum can't even have a single thread without flaming, pissing and *****ing and that most threads end up locked.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OneCrzyEvo21
For Sale - Cars For Sale
0
Apr 3, 2016 09:56 PM
dba Brakes
Vendor Announcements
1
Aug 16, 2015 05:42 PM
RichK@AMS
Automotosports - Illinois
95
Jun 4, 2011 01:23 PM
Evasive EVO
Evo X Vendor 'For Sale' Classifieds
37
Aug 27, 2008 03:55 PM
GreenPsycho
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
3
May 26, 2004 11:17 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM.