Which is faster? ...Nurburgring lap time reference.
Were not comparing apples to oranges hear, look around the "EVO's" lap times (+/- 10 seconds) and you won't see anything that shouldn't be there, for instance you won't see a basic WRX with some exceptional run that beats out an EVO, it's time is where it seems it should be in comparison with others in it's lap time zone. Many HP listings are also in the post and it's true that the high HP cars usually represent better times but not always. But than again we don't compare Porsche GT's or McLaren's to the EVO either, I supplied a broad lap time listing for a sense of scale.
And true, tires are a factor but remember that there is no one tire that works best for all cars. Weather and season is also a big factor at the ring, many runs show an asterisk declaring "wet run" or other. While there are some "specials" listed here I believe the Ring to be a true real world setting that yields "average" capabilities of an OEM mass market car.
And true, tires are a factor but remember that there is no one tire that works best for all cars. Weather and season is also a big factor at the ring, many runs show an asterisk declaring "wet run" or other. While there are some "specials" listed here I believe the Ring to be a true real world setting that yields "average" capabilities of an OEM mass market car.
Originally Posted by mayhem
How about tires? Unless these times were all made with the same rubber or at least something very similar, the times are nearly worthless.
Last edited by TPetsch; Jan 16, 2006 at 09:02 AM.
Oh wow, thats a pretty big list!
I think the EVO would be higher up on the list if it could go a bit faster. On that back straightaway before the finish you can make up some time and the EVO doesn't top out as high as some of the big guns like the Zondas, Porsches and Lambos.
I think the EVO would be higher up on the list if it could go a bit faster. On that back straightaway before the finish you can make up some time and the EVO doesn't top out as high as some of the big guns like the Zondas, Porsches and Lambos.
Originally Posted by TPetsch
Not necessarily, many of these drives are by factory drivers who know the ring and the car that they are driving very well. Or drivers used by Sport Auto Mag who drive the Ring like there own driveway. In most cases many laps are taken to achieve an above average time as low Nurburgring lap times are a form of positive advertisement in many European markets, and believe that manufactures take these time very seriously. Now even in the American market Cadillac (GM) is taking laps to see where there car slots in with some of the greats.
My point was that this list is useless. There has been numerous different drivers in even more numerous weather etc. conditions driving around the ring, that doesn't tell much of performance of a certain car.
The spec C is an awesome vehicle, but you can't compare the regular IX to it. You need to move up to the FQ 320 or 340 as the spec C has 320+ hp. As everyone else has said different drivers, track conditions affect times on a relatively long track. I have seen times of the Evo IX under 8 min on that track...If I could rememebr where I saw it or which model IX.hmmm
Originally Posted by JoizeeX
and with that ^, i'll say, Top Gear should have Stig run different cars on the Ring, the way they do at their airport track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





