HFC vs test pipe
some people say that without a cat you can smell whatever unburned air/fuel mix is coming out of your engine/exhaust. I personally have never experienced any smell from removing the cat on any of my cars in the past. Some people are a bit more paranoid about this than others.
reason why you get different opinions about test pipe smell is because every car is different. cars with cams will have worse smell as their idle will suck (compared to stock cams); hence more unburned fuel from lopy idle. also very skilled tuners can reduce the lopyness of cams and hence reduce smell....
the reason why i stick with test pipe mostly is the price. HFC's are almost double the price of resonated test pipes.
the reason why i stick with test pipe mostly is the price. HFC's are almost double the price of resonated test pipes.
There is a very slight exhaust smell in my garage, but other than that I've never smelled any exhaust gasses with my TP. The exhaust also isn't that loud, when I got it sound checked at a road course it came out to 91.8 dB at 5k rpm in neutral from ~30ft behind the car.
yeah test pipe doesnt make it a huge difference in the end regarding noise, type of muffler is the key. smell wise, mine does smell slightly while idling but its not horrible.
both will smell. test pipe will be worse but its not too bad anyways. imo a hfc isnt worth it. if you want better flow without the smell, get a 3" truck cat, best flow is of course with a tp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TxFAkuma
Evo X General
4
Jul 8, 2016 08:10 AM





