Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Kumho Ecsta MX (for stock wheel)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2006, 09:18 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
4-BNGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Kumho Ecsta MX (for stock wheel)

Size/ Tire Weight/ Rim Width Range/ Section Width/ Overall Diameter

235/45-17 24lbs. / 7.5-9" (8)/ 9.4"/ 25.5"
245/40-17 23lbs. / 8-9.5" (8.5)/ 9.9"/ 24.8"
255/40-17 25lbs. / 8.5-10" (9)/ 10.3"/ 25.1"




According to this, is the 245/40-17 the optimal size for the stock wheel? Thank...

Last edited by 4-BNGR; Jul 22, 2006 at 09:20 AM.
Old Jul 22, 2006, 09:47 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 245 is fine.
Old Jul 22, 2006, 10:00 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
ohio-evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is what I had on my last evo and I will be putting them on my new on when it needs new tires. Which is now. good luck.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 12:45 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just switched from the A047s to these and I hate them... no where near the grip of the advans... I'll sell you a set with 150 miles on them...
Old Jul 23, 2006, 12:50 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Turbolover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phx,AZ
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
H-rated tires! They have no wet or dry grip, WASTE OF MONEY!!
Old Jul 23, 2006, 04:38 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I knew a lot of people that autocrossed with these... obviously, great drivers in slow cars... I can light these things up in my stock IX. The tirerack description about dry preformance is misleading. Paper weights for my EZ-up, nothing more. They are terrifying in the rain.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 05:07 PM
  #7  
Newbie
 
yudalicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
H-rated Kumho MXs? Where?
How can you compare the advans to these when the advans cost about twice as much? For many many weekend HPDE drivers the MXs is the choice because they stick well, tolerate heat well, and are a bargain for the performance they offer.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 05:41 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
4-BNGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They are "Y" speed rated (Y 186 mph 300 km/h).

Are we talking about the same tire, here?
Old Jul 23, 2006, 07:37 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Performance comparison- description was "maximum dry performance sacraficing wet..." dry is equal to the advan in the rain with these. Anyway, I don't like them... 4-BNGR, interested? I will be at VIR next weekend. I paid $440 +s/h. $400 and they are yours. There's a tire guy at the track that could mount and balance them for you.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 07:42 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
4-BNGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nukblazi
Performance comparison- description was "maximum dry performance sacraficing wet..." dry is equal to the advan in the rain with these. Anyway, I don't like them... 4-BNGR, interested? I will be at VIR next weekend. I paid $440 +s/h. $400 and they are yours. There's a tire guy at the track that could mount and balance them for you.
negative
Old Jul 23, 2006, 08:44 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
TurboIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I liked them when I had them.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 09:33 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Matt2.8NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nukblazi
I knew a lot of people that autocrossed with these... obviously, great drivers in slow cars... I can light these things up in my stock IX. The tirerack description about dry preformance is misleading. Paper weights for my EZ-up, nothing more. They are terrifying in the rain.

I ran them in a torrential downpour this weekend at the SCCA Northeast Solo II Divisional, in a horribly underprepped car.

They worked great in the wet with good driving.
Old Jul 23, 2006, 09:51 PM
  #13  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (122)
 
Ultimate CC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Peekskill NY
Posts: 6,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run this and so far I am liking them, the big thing is you have to wear them down a bit before then get fast, at first I hated these tires but they are getting faster and faster each week autoxing or maybe I am just getting better but I think its a combination...
Old Jul 24, 2006, 02:26 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (171)
 
elhalisf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 245/40/17 are wayyy too small, and much smaller than the stock tires. They are NOT a good size replacement for the stock tires.
below is a chart of some numbers

Width Profile Diameter Total Diameter
235 45 17 25.33
255 45 17 26.04
245 45 17 25.68
245 40 17 24.72
255 40 17 25.03

tirerack recommends that you stay within 3% of the stock tire size. the 255/45/17 is 2.8% taller than stock and will affect the speedometer reading by 1.5mph.
Old Jul 26, 2006, 03:15 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
kaonashi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Port Arthur, TX
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i have the 245/40 17 they are nice



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 AM.