Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2012 power variance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2012, 12:46 PM
  #106  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
momostallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 622
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by johnbradley
stock to stock (no tune)-

2012- 245whp
2010- 258whp

stock to stock (tune only) -

2012- 277
2010- 301
F!

convince the owner to do cams! (j/k)
Old Jul 5, 2012, 12:57 PM
  #107  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Kracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 8,970
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
I just replaced my old style timing chain with the new style. It made no power difference.
Keep in mind you also installed a built head with +1mm valves and removed your tubular exhaust manifold...not exactly a back-to-back comparison

That said, a few ounces heavier timing chain isn't going to drastically effect power output.
Old Jul 5, 2012, 01:13 PM
  #108  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (19)
 
migs647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,043
Received 62 Likes on 59 Posts
The only reason I brought up the timing chain...

On a dirt bike the difference between chains can have a drastic different on power. Going from a conventional O-Ring chain to an X-Ring chain robs horsepower. Yes it's a different design, but figured the same rule may apply.
Old Jul 5, 2012, 01:41 PM
  #109  
Newbie
 
Ikamono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the Head, Cams, and Turbo having the same part #; what about the Throttle Body or Intake Manifold being different? Or maybe the exhaust/ downpipe? All these items have been known from time to time for choking 20-30hp on a tuned car...
Old Jul 5, 2012, 02:17 PM
  #110  
Evolving Member
 
SD_Lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lemon Grove
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope someone can figure this out. I mean it can be absolutely nothing but he's now tested several 2012 and they all seem to be down on power.
Old Jul 5, 2012, 02:36 PM
  #111  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
I had another thought and will be testing it today. Perhaps its something similar to the fiasco with some 2005 cams and the cam sensor slot being ground wrong. That affected base timing in that case, but if a batch of cams had incorrectly machined lobecenters or something else then perhaps we could have a similar issue whether affecting ignition timing or MIVEC.
Old Jul 5, 2012, 03:12 PM
  #112  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Robevo RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Park Ridge N.J.
Posts: 10,528
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by migs647
The only reason I brought up the timing chain...

On a dirt bike the difference between chains can have a drastic different on power. Going from a conventional O-Ring chain to an X-Ring chain robs horsepower. Yes it's a different design, but figured the same rule may apply.
That is a good point, thoug i did changed my chain and we didnt notice any differences. But my engine is not stock.
Old Jul 5, 2012, 09:02 PM
  #113  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Old Jul 10, 2012, 07:50 PM
  #114  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aren't 2011 and 2012 chains are the same?
I can swear I saw somewhere that they upgraded the timing chain after 2011..hmm ???
according to the sticker on my door panel my car has been built in June 2011 so does that mean it still has the old chain?
Old Jul 10, 2012, 08:15 PM
  #115  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ugakirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Evans, GA
Posts: 2,609
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts
^^ I believe like half or so of the 2011s got the new chain but all the 2012s did for sure.

Glad the power difference argument is over. So it's just some of the 2012s like/need a little more timing?
Old Jul 11, 2012, 08:06 AM
  #116  
Newbie
 
SkylineFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 34
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Looking forward to seeing the results posted. Wondering if more aggressive timing is the answer for my 2012.
Old Jul 11, 2012, 03:44 PM
  #117  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
x86brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: So King County, WA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Count me in as another 2012 that was bitten by the Friday motor bug. I still would like to know what is with the Friday motors, because I'm pretty pissed off with the car at this point.
Old Jul 11, 2012, 04:35 PM
  #118  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
x86brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: So King County, WA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Oooh, oooh, and I'm the 6th 2012 that you played with and it sucks.

Anyone want to buy a 2012, loll?
Old Jul 11, 2012, 05:40 PM
  #119  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (19)
 
migs647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,043
Received 62 Likes on 59 Posts
How many of these have been MRs vs GSRs?

We sure the TCU programming hasn't been altered in some way? Bryan?
Old Jul 11, 2012, 07:10 PM
  #120  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
momostallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 622
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
not sure what your weather is like there but in these 100 degree days my car is down ~10% in vd


Quick Reply: 2012 power variance?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM.