Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2012 power variance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 12:46 PM
  #106  
momostallion's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 6
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by johnbradley
stock to stock (no tune)-

2012- 245whp
2010- 258whp

stock to stock (tune only) -

2012- 277
2010- 301
F!

convince the owner to do cams! (j/k)
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 12:57 PM
  #107  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
I just replaced my old style timing chain with the new style. It made no power difference.
Keep in mind you also installed a built head with +1mm valves and removed your tubular exhaust manifold...not exactly a back-to-back comparison

That said, a few ounces heavier timing chain isn't going to drastically effect power output.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 01:13 PM
  #108  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
The only reason I brought up the timing chain...

On a dirt bike the difference between chains can have a drastic different on power. Going from a conventional O-Ring chain to an X-Ring chain robs horsepower. Yes it's a different design, but figured the same rule may apply.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #109  
Ikamono's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
With the Head, Cams, and Turbo having the same part #; what about the Throttle Body or Intake Manifold being different? Or maybe the exhaust/ downpipe? All these items have been known from time to time for choking 20-30hp on a tuned car...
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 02:17 PM
  #110  
SD_Lurker's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Lemon Grove
Hope someone can figure this out. I mean it can be absolutely nothing but he's now tested several 2012 and they all seem to be down on power.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #111  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I had another thought and will be testing it today. Perhaps its something similar to the fiasco with some 2005 cams and the cam sensor slot being ground wrong. That affected base timing in that case, but if a batch of cams had incorrectly machined lobecenters or something else then perhaps we could have a similar issue whether affecting ignition timing or MIVEC.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 03:12 PM
  #112  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by migs647
The only reason I brought up the timing chain...

On a dirt bike the difference between chains can have a drastic different on power. Going from a conventional O-Ring chain to an X-Ring chain robs horsepower. Yes it's a different design, but figured the same rule may apply.
That is a good point, thoug i did changed my chain and we didnt notice any differences. But my engine is not stock.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #113  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 07:50 PM
  #114  
glamcem's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Pacific North West
Aren't 2011 and 2012 chains are the same?
I can swear I saw somewhere that they upgraded the timing chain after 2011..hmm ???
according to the sticker on my door panel my car has been built in June 2011 so does that mean it still has the old chain?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 08:15 PM
  #115  
ugakirk's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 47
From: Evans, GA
^^ I believe like half or so of the 2011s got the new chain but all the 2012s did for sure.

Glad the power difference argument is over. So it's just some of the 2012s like/need a little more timing?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 08:06 AM
  #116  
SkylineFanatic's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Looking forward to seeing the results posted. Wondering if more aggressive timing is the answer for my 2012.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 03:44 PM
  #117  
x86brandon's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: So King County, WA
Count me in as another 2012 that was bitten by the Friday motor bug. I still would like to know what is with the Friday motors, because I'm pretty pissed off with the car at this point.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #118  
x86brandon's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: So King County, WA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Okay so the 5th 2012 I have played with showed promise. With nothing more than a TBE and cone filter the car put down 330whp at 25psi. Maybe I got 4 cars in a row that were all friday (afternoon at that) cars. I did a full MIVEC sweep to see what was affecting what, timing, etc. Basically this entire thread can be put to rest now I feel.

A few things I did notice is the 2012 seems to like a little more timing than I have seen in the past, even if only 2-3* here and there. Exhaust cam timing has the biggest impact that I saw as well. I wont have the full results ready to post until next week but I wanted to give a quick update before I left for the weekend.
Oooh, oooh, and I'm the 6th 2012 that you played with and it sucks.

Anyone want to buy a 2012, loll?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 05:40 PM
  #119  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
How many of these have been MRs vs GSRs?

We sure the TCU programming hasn't been altered in some way? Bryan?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #120  
momostallion's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 6
From: Dallas, TX
not sure what your weather is like there but in these 100 degree days my car is down ~10% in vd
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM.