Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2012 power variance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #166  
SamsonEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 1
From: 10,000 frozen lakes
^ i don't think that doing bolt ons will necessarily cause your car to go boom instantly, but a person runs the risk of running lean and doing damage. Cars today need tuning when you bolt things on as the ECU's are tuned for the stock parts. This is what was killing Honda owners with the 2006-2008 Civic Si's. There was no way to tune the car until Hondata finally came out with FlashPro in 2009. Later, people found out that their intakes and exhausts were causing severe leanness in the AFR.

I am a child of the 50's and 60's, when you could bolt parts on and see instant power gains. Tuning consisted of adjusting mixture screws on carburetors and ignition timing and changing to fresh plugs. To get really fancy, one could have have the distributor ignition advance curve changed using lighter springs. That was about it. The only way to test things was to go out on the highway and let her rip.
We used to change plugs regularly as they would foul easily, especially if you ran colder plugs. Working on cars was much simpler back then, but you never saw the gains that people get today.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 06:20 PM
  #167  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Originally Posted by EAGLE 5
so... if I'm reading this correctly (and understanding it too)

Anything that isn't precisely tuned to work around these issues like mods with no tunes etc. will make the car go boom?

All in the name of a smaller carbon footprint?

lame
Nobody knows WHY did anything. There has also been evidence of some 2012's not having this issue.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #168  
Kendogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
I haven't followed this thread for awhile. I was going to let the pro's figure it out

So basically if I stay completely stock the car will be ok. If I add on any bolt-on I should make sure I get a tune or the car might crap out?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 09:14 PM
  #169  
Kendogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by NHEvo24
Don't mod it. We've had cars up here that blow with zero mods, and were denied warranty for 'aggressize driving habits'
Stock 2012 Evo's are blowing? Why? Whats the difference between the 12 and the 08-11?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 09:20 PM
  #170  
SamsonEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 1
From: 10,000 frozen lakes
^ Yeah, good question. I have never read of any stock X's blowing up and certainly have never read anything specifically about 2012's blowing up.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 11:26 PM
  #171  
topEND's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Originally Posted by NHEvo24
Don't mod it. We've had cars up here that blow with zero mods, and were denied warranty for 'aggressize driving habits'
What STOCK 2012 blew there motor I have not read that any STOCK 2012 were having problems blowing up. Of corse someone is going to have there problems there has to be a couple of lemons out there and we all hope that were not the one with the lemon.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 11:38 PM
  #172  
sith_killer_99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Fort Hood Texas
Originally Posted by NHEvo24
Don't mod it. We've had cars up here that blow with zero mods, and were denied warranty for 'aggressize driving habits'
He didn't say 2012's specifically. I think what he is implying is that STOCK Evo's have been brought into dealers and denied warranty because of aggressive driving.

Even if he is serious, which I doubt (probably just poking fun) it would be VERY difficult to deny a legit warranty claim unless the driver was running red line non stop and blew the motor.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2012 | 02:28 AM
  #173  
tons0torque's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
The one difference I know for a fact, is 2012's are using a different cam/crank phase to control timing and injection.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #174  
Kendogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by tons0torque
The one difference I know for a fact, is 2012's are using a different cam/crank phase to control timing and injection.
This has been proven? How was this discovered? And why did they change this from the 08-11? Like someone said earlier, it seems unusual for Mitsu to make a change like this right as the production is coming to an end.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #175  
tons0torque's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Kendogg
This has been proven? How was this discovered? And why did they change this from the 08-11? Like someone said earlier, it seems unusual for Mitsu to make a change like this right as the production is coming to an end.
Because the 2012 4b11t uses a different reluctor ring than 08-10 4b11t's. That's a fact. . . How was it discovered, a few guys bought "new" motors from mitsu to be built instead of using their own cores. When they installed the motors with the newer ring, the cars didn't run.

Why they made the switch is odd. Maybe they are using the code for other soon to be released motors, but they did change the cam/crank phasing.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 01:01 AM
  #176  
insmniac95's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Maybe its a cheaper part, lower production costs...
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 02:22 AM
  #177  
SD_Lurker's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Lemon Grove
Originally Posted by tons0torque
Because the 2012 4b11t uses a different reluctor ring than 08-10 4b11t's. That's a fact. . . How was it discovered, a few guys bought "new" motors from mitsu to be built instead of using their own cores. When they installed the motors with the newer ring, the cars didn't run.

Why they made the switch is odd. Maybe they are using the code for other soon to be released motors, but they did change the cam/crank phasing.
This wouldn't affect the tune and the motor to be down on power. If that were the case then the 2011 would be suffering as well since you clearly stated the change was after 2010. What doesn't make sense is the fact that some people aren't having the issue at all.

I'd really like to get to the bottom of this. I also have a 2012 and will be getting it tuned soon.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #178  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by tons0torque
Because the 2012 4b11t uses a different reluctor ring than 08-10 4b11t's. That's a fact. . . How was it discovered, a few guys bought "new" motors from mitsu to be built instead of using their own cores. When they installed the motors with the newer ring, the cars didn't run.

Why they made the switch is odd. Maybe they are using the code for other soon to be released motors, but they did change the cam/crank phasing.
Means injection phasing has been altered as well most likely. All pieces of the puzzle finally coming to light.

Aaron
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #179  
x86brandon's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: So King County, WA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Means injection phasing has been altered as well most likely. All pieces of the puzzle finally coming to light.

Aaron
Think this can be worked around then?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #180  
SD_Lurker's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Lemon Grove
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Means injection phasing has been altered as well most likely. All pieces of the puzzle finally coming to light.

Aaron
So why wasn't the 11's affected? He said their different pre 2010
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 AM.