Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Stock evo x mr using dataloglab...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #16  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Looks like the Evo X had a better Cd than the previous generations due to design, still didn't see exact specs though.

http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/cor...008/20e_08.pdf
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #17  
blk-majik's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 1
From: CO
I've been using 0.34 and it seems to do a good job. I've set frontal area to 22.9, based off measurements someone took on a different forum.

My curb weight is set to 3594 (with SSS packaged) based off someone weighing their car.

Smoothing factor of 2 seems to be fair.

I'll just attach my car definition file Rename from EVO X GSR 5-Speed.car.txt to EVO X GSR 5-Speed.car.

Also attaching my DDL template to read evoscan logs. enjoy!
Attached Files
File Type: txt
DLL_EvoScan2.6.txt (3.8 KB, 0 views)
File Type: txt
EVO X GSR 5-Speed.car.txt (797 Bytes, 0 views)
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #18  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
well i bought my works air filter and doing some Dll the filter is a great mod for this car,also you can feel the difference but here it is according to DLL i did both runs the same day and same hour maybe 10min in between the runs its what took me to change the filter.
here is the graph.



it gained 10whp and 10ftlb of torque wow for just a filter!

Last edited by jrsimon27; Sep 24, 2009 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #19  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by jrsimon27
well i bought my works air filter and doing some Dll the filter is a great mod for this car,also you can feel the difference but here it is according to DLL i did both runs the same day and same hour maybe 10min in between the runs its what took me to change the filter.
here is the graph.



it gained 10whp and 10ftlb of torque wow for just a filter!
Thanks for sharing results! It may be a bit misleading without a wideband AFR and boost/load log though. The filter may cause the car to hit different loads cells. I'm not sure you'd notice a substantial difference in power if the car was retuned with the filter.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #20  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
either way, nice gain
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #21  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
mellon i sent you a pm also you where right in another thread that 10whp was what i would gain,thanks mellon
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #22  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by blk-majik
I've been using 0.34 and it seems to do a good job. I've set frontal area to 22.9, based off measurements someone took on a different forum.
Sorry for the necro bump. Can you provide me with a link for the FA?

In car and driver, they calculate FA this way:

Width X Height X 0.91=FA. That gives the Evo X a 26.27 sqft FA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snazzyseth
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
28
Jan 17, 2011 05:50 PM
WorldONE
Vendor Announcements
8
Jan 29, 2008 02:06 PM
jrsimon27
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
32
Jan 27, 2007 08:20 PM
jrsimon27
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Dec 12, 2006 04:47 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM.