Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Who tunes partial throttle really well?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2012 | 03:22 PM
  #31  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by Golden
David,
Best Economy for Gas is 16.2. As you go leaner, you actually make more power, so you need less throttle. You end up sucking less air and therefore less fuel. But you are correct, leaning out doesn't add that much econ. Maybe 1 mpg. Adding some timing helps too. But one has to be careful to not burn a hole in their pistons at cruise speeds.
I was simply putting up the math of it to show the difference is not as drastic as was talked about earlier in the thread by someone else. 15.7 or 16.2 that is splitting hairs and the difference would almost have to be under a perfectly controlled test for a full tank of gas on a flat surface to measure the difference in either.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2012 | 07:43 AM
  #32  
vboy425's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 1
From: Spec Ops
1800 cars a year lmao. This guy a joke.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2012 | 11:01 AM
  #33  
acidtonic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 746
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
People have also reported gains (although small) from a COP setup.

I'm still curious what the difference in mileage would be assuming all other variables the same, of running stock low compression compared to 10:1 compression.

I'd like to compare a built 10:1 motor, running a larger turbo, 4.10 final drive, COP setup, no cat, stock cams, with lean cruise to a stock car with a tune. Gotta be worth at least 2mpg more on the highway minimally.... I just wonder how much the compression effects those results.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #34  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by acidtonic
People have also reported gains (although small) from a COP setup.
.
Evo 10 is already COP from the factory.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2012 | 11:27 AM
  #35  
acidtonic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 746
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
Originally Posted by razorlab
Evo 10 is already COP from the factory.
They still have kits that upgrade to a stronger spark even for the Evo X. People have seen gains even over the stock COP system.

Although the COP system is more of a gain on the 8/9 I'll agree with you there.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #36  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Sparktech had the only true upgrade for the X for ignition but have since stopped selling it and are working on it still.

Otherwise the okaka **** is all BS, doesn't do anything...so I would say there isn't really any gains to be had by switching out the stock COP.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 06:54 AM
  #37  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
mmmm snake oil

getting back to the original question... quality takes time..
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #38  
xhomm02's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Czech rep.
Well, I spent 3 years tuning my Stage2 Evo X for WOT as well as partial throttle. I used only street driving, as we do not have any smart tuner with AWD dyno nearby.

I can say - yes, you can get better mileage: run lean (with WB simulating lambda 1.1 in closed loop), run closed loop under all conditions you usually cruise, set high MIVEC overlap in cruise out of boost, higher timing. You can get some 10-15% better economy.

Two problems:

1) takes hudge amount of time making all the maps working fine together and megabytes (maybe even gigabytes) of data logging and hours and hours of night data analyzing

2) potentional problem with too high EGT, which I unfortunatelly have no way to watch. But looks like it is not that big issue, as I have droven some 40k miles with no sensible wear to the engine.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2012 | 01:13 AM
  #39  
Raceghost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 21
From: Out West
I can. I average 21mpg in town, with ocassional boost and stop light drag, and 27mpg all day long on the freeway up to 85 mph average 6000 miles cross country and back, withh full logs, plus photos at each fuel stop, light on, with 366 miles on the trip... to back it up. let me know what you find.

Last edited by Raceghost; Jul 16, 2012 at 01:16 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:32 PM
  #40  
palmerblock's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
maybe if you read and think before you speak you wouldnt sound like a smart *** with an agenda

we have 3 tuners and most know that... my last name isnt Church... do the math

stop trying to make yourself look good and get back on topic.
if you dont have anything positive or informative to say, i suggest you keep it to yourself

this isnt the first time you peaked your head in on one of my reponses and came off as a smart ***....

again, back on topic.

Originally Posted by razorlab
1800 cars a year tuned?

Good lord, anybody that knows a lick of math can figure out that is a total BS claim.

That's basically 5 cars a day, EVERY DAY, seven days a week, 365 days.

Do these tuners that make these redonkulious claims think Evom members are mathtarded?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #41  
palmerblock's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by vboy425
1800 cars a year lmao. This guy a joke.
read post # 8 (our) this means more than one, you learned this when you were a toddler... i hope
post # 19 clarificaton for those that can read/understand, or choose not to
and read the post above

again, back on topic
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #42  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Not defensive at all are we? haha

Still 5 cars a day, EVERY DAY, seven days a week, 365 days doing basic math. Even three tuners all tuning full time every day makes this a stretch.

Again, people aren't idiots on here.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #43  
palmerblock's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
true, ive seen best results at 16.2,
but have dialed it back to 15.8 till i get an egt there

Originally Posted by Golden
David,
Best Economy for Gas is 16.2. As you go leaner, you actually make more power, so you need less throttle. You end up sucking less air and therefore less fuel. But you are correct, leaning out doesn't add that much econ. Maybe 1 mpg. Adding some timing helps too. But one has to be careful to not burn a hole in their pistons at cruise speeds.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:56 PM
  #44  
palmerblock's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
not at all, just stating how it is, and fyi, 6 days a week

my question is why are you stuck on this rather that talk about the subject at hand? lol

i would go into more detail to refute your calculated claim, but no need to and not the right forum... this is about part throttle, not dyno head counts... i just threw that in there on one of my previous post as a credential of my knowledge or experience so to speak, not a promotion of service.

as you may know, we dont promote or advertise anywhere unlike most shops, becuase we dont need to.

Originally Posted by razorlab
Not defensive at all are we? haha

Still 5 cars a day, EVERY DAY, seven days a week, 365 days doing basic math. Even three tuners all tuning full time every day makes this a stretch.

Again, people aren't idiots on here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whotippedmycow
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
3
May 19, 2016 11:39 AM
Biggy VIII
ECU Flash
4
Oct 24, 2012 11:10 AM
hotstix
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
10
Nov 15, 2009 09:55 AM
dek0026
Evo X General
33
Jul 18, 2008 05:45 PM
SuperBoostGuy
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
3
Dec 7, 2006 10:37 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:11 AM.