Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo X bolt on Garrett GT30R turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #241  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by Hiboost
I wish I could get it all installed today but I'm still rounding up a tubular exhaust manifold and doing a 2 day DE with PCA at Watkins Glen in 2 weeks.
You should be careful about the tubular manifold. The GT3076 is MUCH heavier than stock so I don't know if a tubular manifold for a stock turbo would hold out. I took it to a shop here in Japan and they said no way with their manifold.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #242  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by SiC
You should be careful about the tubular manifold. The GT3076 is MUCH heavier than stock so I don't know if a tubular manifold for a stock turbo would hold out. I took it to a shop here in Japan and they said no way with their manifold.
The Full-Race one looks quite beefy. Also, the weight of the turbo is partially supported by the one boss on the lower side of the turbine housing, and the bracket on the compressor housing.

If paranoid, a bracket could be made to go from the manifold to some other solid place on the engine.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #243  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
I was thinking about the extra weight but likely I'm going to settle on a Xtremeboost or the Full Race manifold. Both of those should be a sturdy design, worst cast scenario I'll have a friend weld in some extra support if it looks like it will need it. In fact the Full race manifold specifically says it was meant to bolt up to the Garrett GT30 turbochargers.

Last edited by Hiboost; May 13, 2009 at 11:16 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #244  
Boostd4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Hiboost
Sweet! Those injectors will give you some nice headroom! Likely 800cc injectors will be fine for me on pump gas at 25-26 psi. Down the road if I turn up the boost for a race gas tune is the only time I can see them getting into the 85-100% duty cycle range. Too much power is such a horrible problem, we will see...
I noticed you also ordered a 255 pump, how are you going about mounting it? I know that UR has a "drop in" kit which hits the pocketbook for $300 (with filter). A buddy of mine locally had a machine shop build him a sleeve to make it a drop in (similar design to the UR kit). But I guess my main question is getting the stock in tank filter to go back on.

Just curious mainly...I'm very frustrated that its so hard to put a larger pump in the X...with the 8s and 9s it was a $100 pump and you were done.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #245  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Someone linked me this for a fuel pump install. It's likely not as sturdy as using the UR piece but I ordered the bits from the website he links as well as an in tank fuel filter and it should still do the job.

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/sho...ight=fuel+pump

That will buy me time to get a fuel surge kit or other method to avoid fuel starvation lined up.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 05:35 AM
  #246  
Spoolin11's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
To Hiboost and others,

Unless I am missing something in your mod list, what is the reasoning behind spending the money on a tubular manifold (which last time I checked carried a pretty hefty price tag) rather than a set of cams? As I am sure you know shops appear to be making solid numbers with cams. Another thing that puzzles me about this is if the manifold produced large enough gains all shops such as (AMS, Buschur etc.) would have already produced these or so I would have thought.

Please don’t take my question/comments as a negative I am merely trying to understand the cost benefit as it relates to making the most horsepower. This is true not only in this case but with all of the parts that are available for the X. I will be the first one to admit that I don’t know much about the benefits of a tubular manifold but would certainly be open to hearing what you guys have to say.

Thanks
~Ryan
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #247  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Spoolin11
To Hiboost and others,

Unless I am missing something in your mod list, what is the reasoning behind spending the money on a tubular manifold (which last time I checked carried a pretty hefty price tag) rather than a set of cams? As I am sure you know shops appear to be making solid numbers with cams. Another thing that puzzles me about this is if the manifold produced large enough gains all shops such as (AMS, Buschur etc.) would have already produced these or so I would have thought.

Please don’t take my question/comments as a negative I am merely trying to understand the cost benefit as it relates to making the most horsepower. This is true not only in this case but with all of the parts that are available for the X. I will be the first one to admit that I don’t know much about the benefits of a tubular manifold but would certainly be open to hearing what you guys have to say.

Thanks
~Ryan
The tubular manifolds offer superiour flow compared to the stock cast manifold. On a stock turbo, you'll see improved spool/response and greater midrange with a slight gain in peak. The limited peak gains is mostly likely due to the stock cams and small turbine housing. Once you go to the bigger turbine housings of the Garrett turbos, the stock manifold becomes one of the main choke points.

As for why to do the manifold before cams? Well, it's one of those 'while you're in there'. To install the turbo, you have to take off the manifold, downpipe, etc. So it makes perfect sense to change the manifold at the same time.

Say you were to do cams now and the manifold later. When it came time to install the manifold, you'd be doing half (if not most) of the same install as the turbo. From a time standpoint, you're repeating about 4-6 hours worth of work, if not more. If you're paying someone else for that labor, that could be $400+.

So, might as well do the manifold at the same time and save on the time/labor.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 04:46 AM
  #248  
Spoolin11's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
/\/\/\

All of that makes great sense. It amazes me how sometimes some of the simplest concepts/ideas get lost while thinking about how best to spend your time and your money.

Thanks for the informative response

~Ryan
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 06:08 AM
  #249  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Someone install and dyno the freaking thing for crying out loud!
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #250  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Thanks for answering spdracerut, couldn't have said it better.

For me it's definitely "do it once right" and while 20-25 whp from the tubular manifold might not be as much gains as cams it's still a strong upgrade. Gruppe-S had some headers starting at $450 shipped which was VERY cost effective even if it may have produced a little less HP than more expensive ones. Sadly they are out of stock so most others are in the $800-$900 range with limited or delayed availability. The Full Race one is $1109 and somewhat pricey but it looks like a quality piece.

Cams are a solid upgrade as well but they aren't exactly easy to install on these cars and I have zero prior experience on the 4B11. That means I would be buying the stage 1 cams and getting them installed which would put them $1200+ range. Granted the HP gains are quite good but they also change the way the car idles so for a daily driver it's not an upgrade for everyone.

Likely I'm going to see where I'm at for HP after the Turbo plus supporting mods and look at the cams and/or intake manifold as the next upgrade item. Something tells me low 11's will be good enough for now but as we all know the speed bug bites you hard.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 07:32 AM
  #251  
GSXR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
I just talked to my friend who stopped by a local shop that tuned a 3071. The car was stock except for a drop-in and got 330hp vs 230hp stock. Not bad IMO, but I wish I could've seen the dyno data. I'd like to know how this thing spools and what the power curve looks like.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 07:42 AM
  #252  
Boostd4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Hiboost
Someone linked me this for a fuel pump install. It's likely not as sturdy as using the UR piece but I ordered the bits from the website he links as well as an in tank fuel filter and it should still do the job.

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/sho...ight=fuel+pump

That will buy me time to get a fuel surge kit or other method to avoid fuel starvation lined up.
I was reading through the link and this seems like an absolute no brainer. I know that the foam is intended to be submerged in fuel...but I'm just really wondering about the longterm durability...is it an ABS plastic hybrid of some sort?
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #253  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by GSXR
I just talked to my friend who stopped by a local shop that tuned a 3071. The car was stock except for a drop-in and got 330hp vs 230hp stock. Not bad IMO, but I wish I could've seen the dyno data. I'd like to know how this thing spools and what the power curve looks like.
I've talked to the same shop. From what I recall, they were having issues with maintaining 25psi of boost; they needed a stronger actuator.

So even with the 3071, there's more power to be had even on their near stock setup.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #254  
Boostd4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Noize
Someone install and dyno the freaking thing for crying out loud!
For all of the buzz that's been around the Garrett turbos...and given that it's been out for almost a month now...it's absolutely crazy that no one has installed/tuned it yet.

Mine will be going on the dyno on May 22nd...so I'll post as soon as I can.
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:26 AM
  #255  
Evo-IX-MOMO248's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Northern Jersey
Originally Posted by Boostd4
For all of the buzz that's been around the Garrett turbos...and given that it's been out for almost a month now...it's absolutely crazy that no one has installed/tuned it yet.

Mine will be going on the dyno on May 22nd...so I'll post as soon as I can.


only 1 more week!! better bring a laptop with you and update this thread the second your dyno pull is done
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 AM.