Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

400hp on stock turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #31  
monkeyfish76's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, Indiana
I think u can get 400 at the wheels fairly easy with the X. Ive got a cat delete and catback and I just put down 337 on 91 octane.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #32  
aftershock141's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Why dyno though?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #33  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by monkeyfish76
I think u can get 400 at the wheels fairly easy with the X. Ive got a cat delete and catback and I just put down 337 on 91 octane.
Not without a different turbo and different fuel.

or just a happy happy dyno
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 06:34 AM
  #34  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by tephra
Not without a different turbo and/or different fuel.

or just a happy happy dyno
fixed for you Tephra
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 07:13 AM
  #35  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Yep, 400, stock turbo, E-85 = doable. (and a blast to drive)
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #36  
2.4evo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
I made 368hp with a fmic,downpipe and exhaust then when I dropped my car off we installed a manifold and my car made 398hp and this was on 93pump gas.I'm pretty sure that franks car from xtremeboost makes well over 400hp on the stock turbo.So yes I think that 400 on the stock turbo is doable.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #37  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by 2.4evo
I made 368hp with a fmic,downpipe and exhaust then when I dropped my car off we installed a manifold and my car made 398hp and this was on 93pump gas.I'm pretty sure that franks car from xtremeboost makes well over 400hp on the stock turbo.So yes I think that 400 on the stock turbo is doable.
No offense, but you didn't make 398whp on 93pump,lol.

Your dyno is broken if it shows that. You will need E85/race fuel for 400whp on the stock turbo is the bottom line and even then it's not super easy.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 09:51 PM
  #38  
2.4evo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by murlo26
No offense, but you didn't make 398whp on 93pump,lol.

Your dyno is broken if it shows that. You will need E85/race fuel for 400whp on the stock turbo is the bottom line and even then it's not super easy.
lol really?well my car had dyno on a dynojet in orlando at 368hp and on this dyno it made 358hp,we installed the manifold and tuned the boost up and it made 398hp on pump.Is the dyno off?I do not think its that much off if any.franks car which has all my mods and then some took out an fb red X what was said to had dynoed at 415hp but again I'm speaking from what I've seen.my car now is apart being built but I know his car will soon be back on the forums again and still on stock turbo maybe you can ask him a bit more about his setup.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #39  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Seriously...Florida dyno's are a joke...you cannot hit 400whp on 93 octane on a normal reading dyno of any kind, please don't post that up as noobs might think it's possible.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 08:44 AM
  #40  
2.4evo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by murlo26
Seriously...Florida dyno's are a joke...you cannot hit 400whp on 93 octane on a normal reading dyno of any kind, please don't post that up as noobs might think it's possible.


the second dyno I used was NOT in fl and yes I sure know first hand how much of a joke fl dynos are but the dyno I used was reading correct at the time.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #41  
chriswolf81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Santa Fe, NM
So you are saying a stock turbo full bolt on car beat a fp red, which should have full boltons as well. And I assume same gas on the same model car. Highly unlikely, since nobody would upgrade their turbo then. Feel good dyno exists even outside of FL. Just look at my signature. LOL and those numbers were before some listed mods.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 09:04 AM
  #42  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by chriswolf81
So you are saying a stock turbo full bolt on car beat a fp red, which should have full boltons as well. And I assume same gas on the same model car. Highly unlikely, since nobody would upgrade their turbo then. Feel good dyno exists even outside of FL. Just look at my signature. LOL and those numbers were before some listed mods.
Elevation corrections are the worst, lol.

But hey, at least you can admit it isn't really comparable to other people's numbers. One dyno to another is basically a stupid comparison. Best way is to do the same dyno same day.

But on a typical dynojet, 400whp on a stock turbo pump gas ain't happening, I don't care what you do to it. Making all the boost I could on the stock turbo and E85 I edged over 400whp but it's not something that is simply done and nor is it perfectly safe either.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #43  
casper980's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by StealthIX
dam only 330awhp? how much would that be in bhp?
330/.75= 440bhp accounting for 25% driveline loss
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #44  
tsitalon1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
I thought our DT loss was 20%.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #45  
casper980's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Not sure for a X for VIII and IX I am almost positive it is 25%
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 AM.