Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo X Official Weight

Old Nov 19, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #31  
dklau33's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Wow that's one big b*tch! I think I'm going to have to hold out on the X for now and maybe pick one up a couple years later when there's a used market.

The question now what is different between the USDM model and the JDM model that attributes for the extra 200 lbs? I thought they both had the same amount of airbags? Is it additional crash beams or what not for the USDM model?

Last edited by dklau33; Nov 19, 2007 at 12:32 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #32  
EzeE1o's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: the bay, Cali
the wt. diff between the US and the jdm is then 173 lbs (3517 vs 3344)....which is a similar gain that the prev. gen US vs jdm had....so probably the crash bars makes up most of it
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #33  
IXToes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Holy **** what a fat overweight car 4 cylinder car.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #34  
si_to_evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 875
Likes: 1
From: IL
i lost slight intrest after reading official weights i was expecting 3375 oh well! At least i can think of more cars now
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #35  
Canexican's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 700
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Well, considering there was a 550lb difference in curb weight between the old base lancer and the Evo IX MR, we probably should have seen this coming. The new Lancer GTS weights in at over 3000lbs, so it really shouldnt come as a surprise (especially with the addition of the ACD and SST on the MR), that the weight has, once again, gone up 430lbs and 520+lbs on GSR and MR, respectively (sadly, it could have been worse).

The problem lies in the fact that Mitsu didnt pay enough attention to the base Lancer's dimensions and curb weight. I mean, you can only do so much with what you've got to work with.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #36  
dklau33's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Just imagine if the X didn't use a bunch of aluminum body panels and suspension pieces. The thing would end up weighing as much as a G37!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #37  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
did anyone read the last sentence???? Am I missing something???

sorry not speako engleso, what does subject to change mean???? Hello, anyone in there??


Originally Posted by adambl03
Well, looks like we've got release date, weight and power nailed down. Just need options & PRICING!!! And when the MR will actually come here and if they've got the "issues" worked out yet...

Oh, and look at the very bottom of the chart that jackygor posted...in the small type...this information has been available since 8/20/07! Those bastards at have been holding out on us for 3 months
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #38  
Canexican's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 700
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by pltek
did anyone read the last sentence???? Am I missing something???

sorry not speako engleso, what does subject to change mean???? Hello, anyone in there??


Dude, its not gonna change. The weight gains this time around from base lancer to Evo were actually less than the last time. There is only so much you can do to lose weight when the base weight is over 3000lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #39  
xtnct's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: PA
Well, for those planning on getting the MR, you can make it 11 Lbs lighter by removing some of the extra insulation they added for your interior comfort...

From http://media.mitsubishicars.com/deta...26631&mime=ASC
"...While providing an even deeper-bass exhaust note than the previous model, the 2008 Lancer Evolution is designed to reduce unwanted noises and vibrations. The MR model, in particular, features an additional 11 pounds of sound insulation in the toeboard and under the carpeting."
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #40  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
Dude, while everyone is speculating i have seen a disparity of about 250lbs, wait until the darn thing is released, then nothing will be subject to change, it will, JUST BE.
Originally Posted by Canexican
Dude, its not gonna change. The weight gains this time around from base lancer to Evo were actually less than the last time. There is only so much you can do to lose weight when the base weight is over 3000lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #41  
Canexican's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 700
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by pltek
Dude, while everyone is speculating i have seen a disparity of about 250lbs, wait until the darn thing is released, then nothing will be subject to change, it will, JUST BE.
That disparity is the weight difference between a JDM and a USDM. This Evo is going to be a porker...there is no way around it.

Look at it from a realistic standpoint: You are adding a Turbo, Intercooler and all associated plumbing, beefier transmission, active ceneter differential, rear differential, driveshaft, active yaw control, larger wheels and tires, etc. All of that stuff weights at least 400+lbs...probably more. 3500lbs for a curb weight seems right about where it should be.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #42  
atombomb33's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 2
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Originally Posted by pltek
Dude, while everyone is speculating i have seen a disparity of about 250lbs, wait until the darn thing is released, then nothing will be subject to change, it will, JUST BE.
That chart that jackgor posted is an official chart from Mitsu's website. That's as official as it's gonna get. The weight is set. Not worth arguing it...it's a fact now.

And, as far as "subject to change," that's legal language any company's lawyers include on all documents so if they had a typo or change something down the road they aren't legally obligated to provide something to consumers. In this case, the weight isn't going to change...just like Canexican tried to explain.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #43  
Steiner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
The Evo has officially become the Cameron Manheim of the automotive world. It dresses to hide it's weight and then pretends to be confident and nimble. Blah. Can't beat the laws of physics and can't fool me. Looks like a fat pig to me. You'll find me on the STi forums until the Evo can come south of 3400lbs. Those projected curb weights are just too much.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #44  
Nutrancher's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
From: Crown Point, IN
Originally Posted by Steiner
The Evo has officially become the Cameron Manheim of the automotive world. It dresses to hide it's weight and then pretends to be confident and nimble. Blah. Can't beat the laws of physics and can't fool me. Looks like a fat pig to me. You'll find me on the STi forums until the Evo can come south of 3400lbs. Those projected curb weights are just too much.
Agree. We're talking 300lbs heavier than my IX. Personally I think the IX should have been no more than 3,000lbs and it would be perfect. And while the 4B11T may be the greatest 4cyl in the world, it will still struggle to move 3,600lbs in the X.

At the end of the day, we either needed an increase in displacement and/or decrease in weight to top the IX. I respect Mitsu for sticking with the WRC 2.0L limit, but it's simply not enough to move the extra heft.

Hold onto your IX's and VIII's. The Evo and STI will be the late 60's Mustang & Camaro of their generation.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #45  
Kooldino's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
It's gonna take a lot of work and sacrifice to get the X to the weight I want it to be at...
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:00 AM.