Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo X Official Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #46  
Doc X's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by adambl03
Well, looks like we've got release date, weight and power nailed down. Just need options & PRICING!!! And when the MR will actually come here and if they've got the "issues" worked out yet...

Oh, and look at the very bottom of the chart that jackygor posted...in the small type...this information has been available since 8/20/07! Those bastards at have been holding out on us for 3 months

Nobody talks about how fat their prom date is before they show up for the dance. OINK!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #47  
atombomb33's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 2
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Doc X
Nobody talks about how fat their prom date is before they show up for the dance. OINK!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #48  
VincentX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
I'm so disappointed. The X is truly a fat pig now.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #49  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
Why so surprised? I told ya'll it would be 3500+ lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:11 AM
  #50  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
i am not saying that the X will not gain any weight over the IX, IT WILL, but,...

until all official information is released (mitsu site, brochures, etc) and the car sits on the dealers lots, i will not take any of it as FACT.

I will gladly come back to this thread when that time comes and admit my mistake, if thats the case.

Peace.


Originally Posted by Canexican
That disparity is the weight difference between a JDM and a USDM. This Evo is going to be a porker...there is no way around it.

Look at it from a realistic standpoint: You are adding a Turbo, Intercooler and all associated plumbing, beefier transmission, active ceneter differential, rear differential, driveshaft, active yaw control, larger wheels and tires, etc. All of that stuff weights at least 400+lbs...probably more. 3500lbs for a curb weight seems right about where it should be.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #51  
atombomb33's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 2
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Originally Posted by pltek
i am not saying that the X will not gain any weight over the IX, IT WILL, but,...

until all official information is released (mitsu site, brochures, etc) and the car sits on the dealers lots, i will not take any of it as FACT.

I will gladly come back to this thread when that time comes and admit my mistake, if thats the case.

Peace.
The weight and horsepower are facts straight from Mitsu's website and press release which was posted 11/15/07.

http://media.mitsubishicars.com/deta...73098&mime=ASC

Now, you promised you would admit your mistake
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #52  
Canexican's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 700
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Nutrancher
At the end of the day, we either needed an increase in displacement and/or decrease in weight to top the IX. I respect Mitsu for sticking with the WRC 2.0L limit, but it's simply not enough to move the extra heft.
Reducing weight further would be nearly impossible as it is dependant on a car that is already considered a porker in the econo-class...the base lancer.

What I wish Mitsu would have done is use the block from the Caliber SRT4 motor. I believe that is 2.3 or 2.4ltr? Hell, even the STI has a 2.5ltr just for the states, why can't we? Since Mitsu pussied out of the WRC this year and hasnt revealed plans of going back into the WRC (which I find very ironic considering their whole marketing campaign is 'rally' oriented), there is no point in retaining the 2.0ltr for racing homologation. When you've got so much heft to push, technology is only going to get you so far. As corny as it sounds (especially on an Evo forum), there is no replacement for displacement.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #53  
Steiner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by Canexican
...there is no replacement for displacement.
Yeah there is. It's called 35psi.

Honestly though guys we, of all car owners, should know that factory power outut is far less important than factory suspension setup. I have no doubt the 4B11 will end up being tunable to 400whp. The problem isn't the engine though. We've got 300lbs more *** to drag around now. It's like driving your VIII or IX with Shaq in your backseat...every day...all the time. When it comes to acceleration you can offset his big butt with more power but down a twisty mountain road...I dunno...this car is heavier than an E46 M3 now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TTP Engineering
Vendor Announcements
14
May 22, 2009 10:09 PM
TTP Engineering
Vendor Announcements
12
Mar 24, 2009 03:28 PM
TTP Engineering
Southeast Region
5
Feb 18, 2009 05:03 PM
Speed Element
Evo 'For Sale' Suspension / Brakes / Handling
11
Oct 12, 2006 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 AM.