Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

EVO X vs EVO IX, finally a test! MT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #16  
VincentX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
I guess the Evo X sucks.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #17  
4Trouble's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Wasn't EVO VI vs EVO VII kind of similar comparison when VII first came out? Same for EVO III vs EVO IV. It was more like a backward step until VIII and IX came out, so I guess performance-wise we won't see the new platform having clear edge until XI or XII.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #18  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
is this really a fair test when the evo x is misfiring and ****?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #19  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
With all that hype with that new s-awd and sst. The only thing they say is faster than two seconds against evo9 in their test lap. I think mitshu failed the potential first timer buyers and evo 9 owners to really give us an impressive numbers. Look at Nissan they did really improve GTR in all aspects 0 to 60, 1/4 mile, hp/torgue, cdrag, top speed. Nurburg time. Most of this new owners will race this car on red light, on straight and not on lap time. They already did 4.7 sec 0 to 60 why go back to 5 sec mark. Who needs luxury this car breed is performance. GTR did performance and luxury. Im just venting. You know what they should really do is beef up that hp/torque at least 320 to 350hp to compensate the wt added. I just don't get it. The only thing that is better ion that test is the useless braking and lateral g's, useless because it's better than a few points only and still slower in lap time. I just don't get it again. And the basic/ powertrain warranty sucks especially with the new unproven 5speed/sst dual clutch.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #20  
ninekrevs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (119)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Just because the X is a new Evo desn't make it better. The Evo VI TME is still the best Evo ever made.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #21  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
is that the one use in jackie chan's movie WHO AM I?



Originally Posted by ninekrevs
Just because the X is a new Evo desn't make it better. The Evo VI TME is still the best Evo ever made.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #22  
jackygor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From: VANCOUVER BC
^^^^

A quick google search found me this...



correct me if I am wrong though.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #23  
saev's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
Though the X may be more proper and polished when it speaks to you, the IX tells better stories.

We get the surly pirate car. Hell yea.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:42 AM
  #24  
madfast's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: tsukuba turn 4
after looking at the specs, is any of this really a surprise??? it's clear the X hasn't gained enough power to overcome it's weight.

even a "healthy" Evo X won't beat the IX. it's pure physics. still a great car but not surprising... i wonder if anybody has the track layout of the mitsu proving grounds. are they simply lying or is the track somehow advantageous to the X???

on a similar note, the GT-R gained some 200 lbs but it also added about 150-200 more hp. of course it's a $70k car but you get the point.

hey that Concept RA is looking mighty promising...::slowly getting off the evo x bandwagon::
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #25  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
in jacky chan's movie: car is in 2:10 minutes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmYFzJ2G6Q

evo 6 is faster than evo 9 with 5th Gear: Nice and very Nimble car

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fv006pMw6s


tiff N:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=0
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #26  
jackygor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From: VANCOUVER BC
Originally Posted by madfast
after looking at the specs, is any of this really a surprise??? it's clear the X hasn't gained enough power to overcome it's weight.

even a "healthy" Evo X won't beat the IX. it's pure physics. still a great car but not surprising... i wonder if anybody has the track layout of the mitsu proving grounds. are they simply lying or is the track somehow advantageous to the X???

on a similar note, the GT-R gained some 200 lbs but it also added about 150-200 more hp. of course it's a $70k car but you get the point.

hey that Concept RA is looking mighty promising...::slowly getting off the evo x bandwagon::
When Mitsubishi said that the evo x can do 2 second faster around the track than the 9, they were comparing the JDM evo x to the USDM 9. Which we all know JDM is faster than USDM.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #27  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
Originally Posted by jackygor
When Mitsubishi said that the evo x can do 2 second faster around the track than the 9, they were comparing the JDM evo x to the USDM 9. Which we all know JDM is faster than USDM.

lol... your also roaming around here. i used to browse evo m and evo x at the same time.... so it's means jdm 9 and evo x should be at least equal. but the test shows the usdm is even faster than evo x, which is not right.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #28  
Arithmetic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Wow... just started reading, so far, very interesting results...
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:27 AM
  #29  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
Oh crap

14.0 @ 96 mph

5.4 0-60

1.5 seconds slower around a 2:30 second track
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 01:57 AM
  #30  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
That's slower than Motor Trend ran with a automatic Mustang GT when they came out....13.6@99mph...5.1 0-60
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 PM.