EVO X vs EVO IX, finally a test! MT
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html
Just started reading 1st page.........sounds like there are some issues with the X they got as the results are not pretty. Damn I wanted EVO X to win but if tests keep popping up like this back to EVO IX for next car.......
Ouch, 0-60 and 1/4 not looking pretty!? 96 mph trap? EVO IX beat the X around the track?? Need to keep reading
Just started reading 1st page.........sounds like there are some issues with the X they got as the results are not pretty. Damn I wanted EVO X to win but if tests keep popping up like this back to EVO IX for next car.......
Ouch, 0-60 and 1/4 not looking pretty!? 96 mph trap? EVO IX beat the X around the track?? Need to keep reading
Last edited by EVO Knight; Nov 27, 2007 at 10:21 PM.
Based on a sick Evo X that comparison is inconclusive. Mind you I still don't think the X will win even healthy. BTW the weight comparison compares the IX MR to the X MR, which is not what they tested.
Trending Topics
But quick is a relative term and compared with the IX GSR, the X could be best described as sluggish. Powered by the proven iron-block 4G63 turbo-four making 286 horses, the IX eclipsed both marks in 4.7 and 13.4 at 102.2, respectively. Seeing that the old GSR weighs a substantial 331 pounds less than the new one yet sports a near identical horsepower rating, not to mention a similar torque output-289 pound-feet versus the X's 300 (estimated)-it's not surprising that the IX was the brisker of the two.
*glances at his IX, mwahahahahaha*
*glances at his IX, mwahahahahaha*
It would be nice if the production model is faster though.
What is the point of having so much gripe if the car can't even go fast?!
Last edited by EVO Knight; Nov 27, 2007 at 11:33 PM.



