CLICK ME TO READ

 

nice review. It is still slower around a track . I had to be the first say it, sorry. But seriously you took a very unbiased approach which was well conveyed through the review.

 

I think Top Gear should do a segment on it and tell us. lol

 

The top gear review is the review I wanna see of the evo X. That guy is BLUNT!

 

Previous Evolutions have had AYC, just the Americans have never had it. This isn't big news.

 

True, but this is the first time that we get to drive an evo with AYC, so it IS big news

 

Right, but the summary of the article was basicly, "look, even though the Evolution lost the 4G63, gained weight, and didn't really gain any more power, look, AYC, ooohh ahhh, three letters make it all better, A Y C....".

So what does that mean for the European and Japanese market, they didn't really gain ANYTHING, they just lost the venerable engine that powered the car since it's inception, plus now it's heavier. Sounds crappy.

 

I can almost bet money someone will swap a 4g63 into this thing because Id like to!

 

Might be worthwhile, lol.

 

I bet money someone does it!

 

since the seven edition, the evo's have ACD AYC. / and we know ,the 7th evo was almost a worst one/and the AYC is not an issue free device. So some even ended up taking out.
but the AYC was intruduced for the mass in the 1996 Evo IV. And still isn't the greatest thing.
So i'm just try to point out, the AYC is not the winner formula . They know it so they need to change it . Now they doing this S-AWC. So We will see.

 

I was more along the lines of wanting the new lighter engine in my Evo 8

 

so EvoM reviews the X, gives it a thumbs up, and yet the babies still ***** and moan about it.

 

I guess you didn't watch it, they basicly said it gained weight, wasn't much faster around a track, and rambled on somthing about AYC, and said it was a great Evo for people "over 30". How is that a thumbs up?

 

because that's the way it is... things will never be the same