Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Not impressed Evo X experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #121  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Originally Posted by urslo4n8
I just think its amazing that Mitsubishi AND Subaru both wound up making their flagship cars SLOWER. Just opposite the trend of an updated version. The X is nice but i wouldnt spring that money for it. Im glad i did my research and got the 9.
I also think its weird... But from either standpoint, I think they are targeting a broader audience. C&D still puts the 0-60 times at 4.6. I'm not sure how they pulled those numbers as I believe it to be a little slower than this, BUT: for the added weight, and the improved stying + amenities of the car I think its impressive personally. I grew up around a lot of porsches as a kid and the statement I always heard was, "it's not how fast you go, but how you go fast." I know they didn't make it up or anything but that statement stuck with me, and I'm reminded of it when I look at the X. People looking for the absolute fastest evo in stock form will not find it in the X. People looking for a car that is nearly as quick, with quite a few more options, safety features, and a car that every uninformed motorist isn't pointing and laughing at (ie most people in their mid 30's and up) will find a nice fit with the X.

To say its not competitive is relative. It does compete with the new STI quite well. When I consider the looks of both, the X becomes an easy choice for me. I think mitsu wanted to put themselves in a position where there really were visible roots extending to their base model, from their top end production car. Not good for the EVO enthusiast in every regard, but good for Mitsu - and a win for the average consumer. They finally get a base lancer that doesnt look like hell, and with the ralliart on the horizon, they have upsell options a' plenty. I personally think it was rather intelligent of them to develop an EVO that grew with its audience. Not everyone wants the super aggressive boy racer look of the 8's and 9's. I personally wish I could get the performance of the 9 in the look of the X. Not to say I am sad to have the IX, its just a preference of mine. I personally believe that to *most* people buying a car, evo or no, its not just about the 1/4 mile times. Its a combination of style, performance, *affordability*, practicality, and safety. Cars are getting more and more expensive, its not just the evo. I think in nearly all aspects that I've mentioned, the evo will meet or exceed the expectations of the prospective buyer. To those who are looking for pure performance, the introduction of the X means cheaper 8's and 9's... A win win for all.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 12:34 AM
  #122  
evofan_08's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 601
Likes: 2
From: Island park
Buying a x would not be a disappointment for someone who has never owned a 8 or 9. It's just a different car now, hate it or love it.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 01:58 AM
  #123  
michow87's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: California
i plan on being one of the peeps here who is gonna go from never owning an Evo to getting an X. i'm personally excited. the one thing that makes me want the X over the IX is the superior handling of the X over the IX. the power isn't as important to me seeing as how i'll be going from a FWD 245whp eclipse to an Evo X.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 05:56 AM
  #124  
urslo4n8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY (Hurry up and wait)
Guys dont get me wrong ...the X in comparison to the STI is HANDS DOWN the better looking/handling car. I just thought it was weird the route they took with the redesign
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 06:37 AM
  #125  
lords3t's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville, MD
Originally Posted by TalonTuner4G63
How is what I said closed minded, and how is what I said about aluminum engines discrediting with no proof? Do a google search about engine block alloys and strenght, and aluminum vs iron engines. Plenty of proof is but a few clicks and keystrokes away. You think it by accident engines like the 4G63 or 2JZ-GTE are so strong?
Take up your own advice. It won't take you long to see proof of the ability of modern aluminum engines (eg. competition Vauxhall Astra). Is AMS or Buschur going to be releasing a 900+hp EvoX any time soon? Probably not. Can the drive train even take that kind of power? I have no clue. Will it hold the 400-500 hp mark that will satisfy a large majority of it's demographic? I'd bet money it will but again, time will be the best proof. Despite your assumption, I am not speculating presumptuously or speaking out of ignorance. I'm well aware of the difference in strength between aluminum and iron. However, it would be misguided to think that is the only factor in building a successful engine.

Originally Posted by michow87
i plan on being one of the peeps here who is gonna go from never owning an Evo to getting an X. i'm personally excited. the one thing that makes me want the X over the IX is the superior handling of the X over the IX. the power isn't as important to me seeing as how i'll be going from a FWD 245whp eclipse to an Evo X.
Then I'm sure you'll be pleseantly surprised. The EvoX is not slow. It may not have as much 'in-the-pants' power out of the box as the previous models, but it is quick. Also, the handling difference here will be even greater than that felt in Japan and the UK as it is the first model to arrive in the US with AYC. Good luck with your purchase, hope it works out without you being robbed too badly. caveat emptor

Last edited by lords3t; Mar 6, 2008 at 10:24 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #126  
urslo4n8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY (Hurry up and wait)
The same thing was talked about when FORD came out with their 4.6 modular motors outdating the 5.0 models. Time will tell. The 4B11 will most likely hold up to a great standard
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #127  
TCinOC's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Jameson_IXMR
lol, the only dealer in Jax FL. (2 stores, same dealer) said they would give me 18k for my 06MR with 4000 miles on it, in perfect (not a single flaw) condition. Im keeping it, but was curious what they would take it for. "Unlock some horsepower!" lol. They told me that the X is the meanest thing on the street, tons of people are fighting to buy it, 10,000 markup. I said no. They called me back and said mabye we could work something out to get them on the streets so they could sell them lol. I told them, your not going to sell that car for 45k (it's a bare bones model too). They are still at it, and still have the 3 original X's they have had since they came in a month ago.
That's precisely why dealers get such a bad rap! The bad ones make an impression on consumers and often times forgets there are good ones out there (albeit scarce). Price gouging is messed up, especially when these fools can't even sell those "hard to keep on the lot" vehicles
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #128  
white_turbo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 18
Originally Posted by evofan_08
Buying a x would not be a disappointment for someone who has never owned a 8 or 9. It's just a different car now, hate it or love it.
I am hitting my nuts for not getting a IX when I could have. I don't own it, but drove it enough to know how fast the car is. I could only hope the X is the real deal.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #129  
jdmpurest's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Fussa, japan
Maybe X's feel slower because the power curve is way more linear than the 8/9's

As far as the iron vs aluminum block nonsense I hope everyone in here knows that the new X has ductile iron sleeves. Just in case no one knew.

Last edited by jdmpurest; Mar 6, 2008 at 05:13 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #130  
evofan_08's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 601
Likes: 2
From: Island park
Originally Posted by lords3t
Take up your own advice. It won't take you long to see proof of the ability of modern aluminum engines (eg. competition Vauxhall Astra). Is AMS or Buschur going to be releasing a 900+hp EvoX any time soon? Probably not. Can the drive train even take that kind of power? I have no clue. Will it hold the 400-500 hp mark that will satisfy a large majority of it's demographic? I'd bet money it will but again, time will be the best proof. Despite your assumption, I am not speculating presumptuously or speaking out of ignorance. I'm well aware of the difference in strength between aluminum and iron. However, it would be misguided to think that is the only factor in building a successful engine.
The aluminum choice on Mitsubishi's end was crucial in cutting back on weight. It also utilizes a direct valve actuation set up further cutting back on weight. Aluminum is not as strong as an iron block but in this engines case it's more reliable due to the separate cooling chambers in the head and block.

Originally Posted by white_turbo
I am hitting my nuts for not getting a IX when I could have. I don't own it, but drove it enough to know how fast the car is. I could only hope the X is the real deal.
I almost bought a IX a few months back but didn't because I wanted to wait on the x and I love the x now after reading and hearing about it and sitting in it. I can't wait to see the full potential of the 4b11. A lot of the complaints about the x seem to derive from Mitsubishi's choice of making a greener, safer, more comfy evo when before they only sought after seeing how fast they could make the it go.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 04:31 AM
  #131  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by evofan_08
The aluminum choice on Mitsubishi's end was crucial in cutting back on weight. It also utilizes a direct valve actuation set up further cutting back on weight. Aluminum is not as strong as an iron block but in this engines case it's more reliable due to the separate cooling chambers in the head and block.

I almost bought a IX a few months back but didn't because I wanted to wait on the x and I love the x now after reading and hearing about it and sitting in it. I can't wait to see the full potential of the 4b11. A lot of the complaints about the x seem to derive from Mitsubishi's choice of making a greener, safer, more comfy evo when before they only sought after seeing how fast they could make the it go.
"[QUOTE=evofan_08;5376165]The aluminum choice on Mitsubishi's end was crucial in cutting back on weight. It also utilizes a direct valve actuation set up further cutting back on weight. Aluminum is not as strong as an iron block but in this engines case it's more reliable due to the separate cooling chambers in the head and block."

THe 4b11 aluminum engine that weighs 27.5 pounds less then a 4G63T.
Did you ever holded in hand the 4G63T exhaust manifold? If you change that only then the difference will be what? IF the 4G63T got the Mivec exhaust system too , what is a really difference being greener? 4b11 is a safer engine? How do you know? The 4G63T has planty of cooling already , guys are running on 30+ psi on it, so no worries there.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #132  
TalonTuner4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 2
From: Actionville, FL
Originally Posted by evofan_08
The aluminum choice on Mitsubishi's end was crucial in cutting back on weight.
So I guess that is somehow going to negate the couple hundred pounds the Evolution has put on over the IX? 30 or so lbs..... Some X-lax and a few less burgers a week could have accomplished the same thing, and still has twice the strenght with the 4G63
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #133  
Shahul X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
twice the strength? Thats just an assumption... Will it hold as much stock as a closed deck iron block? Probably not

Most owners will mod, but most won't get past 400 and tuners are there now almost without a tune

I understand why your upset talon... The 4g63 was beloved but its been around forever.... You have to move on .. Mitsu needs to ensure a future and with higher safety standards and emmisons here now and getting stricter ; they need to ensure the evolve with that

I think thy did an admiral job making the almost as fast in a straight line and finally giving us the sawc of past evo's making the X handle better than usdm 8 and 9's

They have to have to evo resemble the base lancers and ralliarts to sell them also.... Nobody would mistake a evo 8 with a oz lancer... And that was actually a problem since the base lancers were the bread and butter car and people didnt associate them together

This new evo x is everything it HAS to be for mitsu to suceed in the future

The evo 9 is a phenominal car nobody will deny that , but the evo x is also

And not all of us dealers are stupid or jerks.... And there is no way I could give you $29k for your 9 mr unless it was mint with under 5k miles... LOL ....

I hooked my buddy up and gave him more for his is350 than carmax, under $30k miles and it was a $40k car new... And it wasn't much over 30
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #134  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Shahul X
And there is no way I could give you $29k for your 9 mr unless it was mint with under 5k miles... LOL ....
Because your dealer won't give $29k doesn't mean that the car isn't worth that. I wouldn't give any dealer my car for less than $25k and it's got 48k miles on it.

He could get $30k+ from a private seller easily.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #135  
Thegame's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Kind of like my trade in that was going to be wholesaled out... Two days later, I stop by and see my old car with a $4,000 mark up sitting on the lot ready to be sold.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 PM.