I'm in
kevin,
congrads on your evo X, i have been thinking about the same with my 9. Please let me know if it is faster on the track than your 9. FYI for those who can use a tax deduction for 2008. For those who can use an Evo X for a delivery car.
New guidance on Stimulus's Act increased expensing and bonus deprecation
Rev Proc 2008-54, 2008-38 IRB
A new revenue procedure provides guidance on the 2008 Stimulus Act's enhanced expensing under Code Sec. 179, and 50% bonus first year depreciation for most types of depreciable personal property as well as qualifying software. The guidance explains how the new rules interact with GO Zone and Kansas disaster area incentives. It also provides rules for making expensing elections on amended returns.
Enhanced expensing. Under the Stimulus Act, a qualifying business can expense up to $250,000 of Code Sec. 179 property purchased by the taxpayer in a tax year beginning in 2008. That's a significant boost from the $128,000 expensing limit that otherwise would have applied. The $250,000 amount is reduced if the cost of all Code Sec. 179 property placed in service by the taxpayer during the tax year exceeds $800,000 (a big jump from the $510,000 ceiling that otherwise would have applied). The Stimulus Act does not alter the $25,000 expensing limit on heavy sport utility vehicles used for business.
For details on enhanced expensing under the Stimulus Act, see article in Federal Taxes Weekly Alert Newsletter 02/14/2008.
50% bonus depreciation. Under the Stimulus Act, businesses may claim a bonus depreciation allowance equal to 50% of the adjusted basis of qualifying property during the year the property is placed in service. In general, the property must be new, bought after Dec. 31, 2007 and before Jan. 1, 2009, and must be placed in service after Dec. 31, 2007, but generally before Jan. 1, 2009.
congrads on your evo X, i have been thinking about the same with my 9. Please let me know if it is faster on the track than your 9. FYI for those who can use a tax deduction for 2008. For those who can use an Evo X for a delivery car.
New guidance on Stimulus's Act increased expensing and bonus deprecation
Rev Proc 2008-54, 2008-38 IRB
A new revenue procedure provides guidance on the 2008 Stimulus Act's enhanced expensing under Code Sec. 179, and 50% bonus first year depreciation for most types of depreciable personal property as well as qualifying software. The guidance explains how the new rules interact with GO Zone and Kansas disaster area incentives. It also provides rules for making expensing elections on amended returns.
Enhanced expensing. Under the Stimulus Act, a qualifying business can expense up to $250,000 of Code Sec. 179 property purchased by the taxpayer in a tax year beginning in 2008. That's a significant boost from the $128,000 expensing limit that otherwise would have applied. The $250,000 amount is reduced if the cost of all Code Sec. 179 property placed in service by the taxpayer during the tax year exceeds $800,000 (a big jump from the $510,000 ceiling that otherwise would have applied). The Stimulus Act does not alter the $25,000 expensing limit on heavy sport utility vehicles used for business.
For details on enhanced expensing under the Stimulus Act, see article in Federal Taxes Weekly Alert Newsletter 02/14/2008.
50% bonus depreciation. Under the Stimulus Act, businesses may claim a bonus depreciation allowance equal to 50% of the adjusted basis of qualifying property during the year the property is placed in service. In general, the property must be new, bought after Dec. 31, 2007 and before Jan. 1, 2009, and must be placed in service after Dec. 31, 2007, but generally before Jan. 1, 2009.
Just traded in my 9 on a 10. Despite reading to the contrary, I found the 10 to handle every bit as good as my nine did (stock at least), and acceleration wise I couldn't tell the difference either. The two things that impressed me were the 10 defaults to over-steer instead of plowing the **** outta the front, and the car is much more stable everywhere, be it over bumps, turning in, mid-corner... I might even decide to drive it on the street every now and then.
The fact that my payment dropped damn-near $300 a month is the reason why I looked, but now is just icing on the cake.
The fact that my payment dropped damn-near $300 a month is the reason why I looked, but now is just icing on the cake.
I recently had an opportunity to drive someone else's 10 from NJ to Connecticut. It was equipped with intake, exhaust, and a tune I think. I gotta say 10 definitely impressed me with its handling. As others mentioned, it definitely understeered less than the 9. I was quite surprised about its acceleration however. I knew going in 10 was going to be slightly slower than the 9 but I was quite dissappointed to say the least. I'm assuming I got used to my modded 9. I guess nothing a few more mods can't take care of.
As an extremely happy IX owner, I would not trade my car for X any time soon. But I would say I was pleasantly surprised.
As an extremely happy IX owner, I would not trade my car for X any time soon. But I would say I was pleasantly surprised.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TrinaBabe
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
23
Feb 11, 2020 04:56 PM
SuperchargedGTZ
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
6
Mar 16, 2008 11:32 AM
dman9271
Lancer Tires, Wheels, Brakes & Suspension - Sponsored by The Tire Rack
24
Nov 29, 2007 03:27 PM
Soon2BEVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
19
Feb 17, 2006 07:47 PM




