MR vs. GSR...for real
Sorry, migs, it's an automatic. If it can shift itself (regardless of the technology used on the inside), it's an automatic. There is no way around that. You can try to defend it any way you want, but that doesn't change the fact of what it is. It's not a traditional torque converter, but it's still an automatic. Embrace it and love it for what it is.
In the end, it's a wonderfully fast shifting transmission and is probably the best transmission for the track (which is what it was engineered for). The technology behind it is amazing. The lighting fast shifts are great, as are the rev-matched downshifts. But, as a daily driver, it does not offer the smoothness of a torque converter and you cannot modulate the clutch like a manual. It's a great transmission, but it does have it's flaws.
You are also COMPLETELY wrong about not being able to modulate the clutch. Sure, you have no control once you're off the line and the clutch is engaged, but throttle control before and during a shift, make a difference in how the clutch is engaged. You have quite a bit of control when coming off the line. You can feather the clutch by feathering the throttle. You don't have EXCLUSIVE control of the clutch, but you DO have control. While it's not full control, it's more control than you are letting on.
When you actually own an MR and use it as a DD, then you can comment on how it is to drive it as a DD. Until then, STFU.
See comments in red.
Semantics, and it's stupid. Automatic or not, it IS NOT what the majority of people think of, and consider an "automatic transmission".
Hold on a second here...you claim that I'm making up facts when you make a claim like this and try to pass it off as a fact? Sorry, you can't have it both ways. You don't have any idea what the majority of people consider it. If you have a study that has been published, please post it up. You should read some of the car magazines. They classify a dual-clutch as an automatic. The freaking engineers and product planners at Audi and VW classify the DSG as an automatic. I think I'll side with the guys designing the first cars to use the transmission. The reason I know the product designers classify it that way is because I work with Audi.
By the way, the whole discussion about classification started by Migs in post #172. He (and you) are both MR fanboys who feel like you have to defend your purchase so vehemently simply because someone calls the transmission something you don't agree with. Like I said in my previous post, the transmission is a wonderful transmission. It has its advantages and disadvantages. It's the right transmission for some and not for others.
Sorry, one final thing. If it's "just semantics" to you, why do you care so much to respond? Why does Migs care so much in post #172 and then to last out at me? It's not just semantics, is it?
WRONG. PLEASE stop stating things you see as fact, but are absolutely not fact. You don't own the car, and I could care less if you've driven one a couple times before or not. You don't know CRAP about the transmission, and it shows. You are going off what people with problems are saying "the car jerks when coming to a stop". Mine does not, and never has had this issue. Even through all my issues with my car, I haven't experienced this jerky shifting when coming to a stop. Just because you read it in the SST forum as a moderator, doesn't mean it happens on ALL of them. Stop making your moderator knowledge look as if you know everything about the car you don't own.
No, I don't own the MR. I don't need to. I don't own a Van Gogh painting, but I can sure comment on the pure brilliance of his work. Ownership of something does not make one an expert about the topic. Take that bit of advice with you in the future. It will help to open your mind a little bit.
Back the TC-SST. Sure I don't own one, but I have enough seat time in an MR (probably a cumulative of about 2 weeks total in DD conditions and on track) to know that the transmission behaves just like the R32 I owned for almost 2 years. Just like every Audi with S-tronic that I've driven as a daily driver for weeks at a time and also on the track at VIR. Just like the M3 with DCT that I've driven. They all behave the same because of the dual-clutch design. How many of these other cars have you driven? You try to make it seem like my knowledge is only what I read on the internet. Well, it's far from it. I've got more than enough seat time to know what the idiosyncrasies are for this transmission.
Again, this is all you spewing opinion even though you don't own an MR. You clearly haven't had enough experience driving the car as a DD, to have a valid DD opinion. While the automatic mode is not perfect, the normal mode provides smooth shifting for the majority of shifts. They are not all perfect, but then again, nor is every shift in a regular old automatic with a torque converter. An automatic transmission is just as stupid as the SST when it comes to shift jerkyness and inconsistency.
Wait, you just told me in the previous paragraph that I'm wrong about the idiosyncrasies of the transmission...but, now you're admitting to them? Which is it?
You are also COMPLETELY wrong about not being able to modulate the clutch. Sure, you have no control once you're off the line and the clutch is engaged, but throttle control before and during a shift, make a difference in how the clutch is engaged. You have quite a bit of control when coming off the line. You can feather the clutch by feathering the throttle. You don't have EXCLUSIVE control of the clutch, but you DO have control. While it's not full control, it's more control than you are letting on.
You're letting on that there is more control than there actually is. The clutches are computer controlled and the TCM is the ultimate decision maker...not the driver. Yes, I fully understand that there is a small amount of control based on throttle and brake inputs. But, in the end, the TCM makes the decision based on an algorithm written by a product designer who has to look at the life of the clutches, blending that with performance and blending that with smoothness. It can't be 100% correct in every situation (as evidenced by the slow creep from a stop and the jerkiness associated with it). The transmission isn't perfect because of that. It's not a problem, but it's not perfect either.
When you actually own an MR and use it as a DD, then you can comment on how it is to drive it as a DD. Until then, STFU.
When you learn a little bit more about the transmission in your car, we'll talk. Otherwise, I suggest that you don't tell people on this site to "STFU" simply because they don't agree with you're POV.
Hold on a second here...you claim that I'm making up facts when you make a claim like this and try to pass it off as a fact? Sorry, you can't have it both ways. You don't have any idea what the majority of people consider it. If you have a study that has been published, please post it up. You should read some of the car magazines. They classify a dual-clutch as an automatic. The freaking engineers and product planners at Audi and VW classify the DSG as an automatic. I think I'll side with the guys designing the first cars to use the transmission. The reason I know the product designers classify it that way is because I work with Audi.
By the way, the whole discussion about classification started by Migs in post #172. He (and you) are both MR fanboys who feel like you have to defend your purchase so vehemently simply because someone calls the transmission something you don't agree with. Like I said in my previous post, the transmission is a wonderful transmission. It has its advantages and disadvantages. It's the right transmission for some and not for others.
Sorry, one final thing. If it's "just semantics" to you, why do you care so much to respond? Why does Migs care so much in post #172 and then to last out at me? It's not just semantics, is it?
WRONG. PLEASE stop stating things you see as fact, but are absolutely not fact. You don't own the car, and I could care less if you've driven one a couple times before or not. You don't know CRAP about the transmission, and it shows. You are going off what people with problems are saying "the car jerks when coming to a stop". Mine does not, and never has had this issue. Even through all my issues with my car, I haven't experienced this jerky shifting when coming to a stop. Just because you read it in the SST forum as a moderator, doesn't mean it happens on ALL of them. Stop making your moderator knowledge look as if you know everything about the car you don't own.
No, I don't own the MR. I don't need to. I don't own a Van Gogh painting, but I can sure comment on the pure brilliance of his work. Ownership of something does not make one an expert about the topic. Take that bit of advice with you in the future. It will help to open your mind a little bit.
Back the TC-SST. Sure I don't own one, but I have enough seat time in an MR (probably a cumulative of about 2 weeks total in DD conditions and on track) to know that the transmission behaves just like the R32 I owned for almost 2 years. Just like every Audi with S-tronic that I've driven as a daily driver for weeks at a time and also on the track at VIR. Just like the M3 with DCT that I've driven. They all behave the same because of the dual-clutch design. How many of these other cars have you driven? You try to make it seem like my knowledge is only what I read on the internet. Well, it's far from it. I've got more than enough seat time to know what the idiosyncrasies are for this transmission.
Again, this is all you spewing opinion even though you don't own an MR. You clearly haven't had enough experience driving the car as a DD, to have a valid DD opinion. While the automatic mode is not perfect, the normal mode provides smooth shifting for the majority of shifts. They are not all perfect, but then again, nor is every shift in a regular old automatic with a torque converter. An automatic transmission is just as stupid as the SST when it comes to shift jerkyness and inconsistency.
Wait, you just told me in the previous paragraph that I'm wrong about the idiosyncrasies of the transmission...but, now you're admitting to them? Which is it?
You are also COMPLETELY wrong about not being able to modulate the clutch. Sure, you have no control once you're off the line and the clutch is engaged, but throttle control before and during a shift, make a difference in how the clutch is engaged. You have quite a bit of control when coming off the line. You can feather the clutch by feathering the throttle. You don't have EXCLUSIVE control of the clutch, but you DO have control. While it's not full control, it's more control than you are letting on.
You're letting on that there is more control than there actually is. The clutches are computer controlled and the TCM is the ultimate decision maker...not the driver. Yes, I fully understand that there is a small amount of control based on throttle and brake inputs. But, in the end, the TCM makes the decision based on an algorithm written by a product designer who has to look at the life of the clutches, blending that with performance and blending that with smoothness. It can't be 100% correct in every situation (as evidenced by the slow creep from a stop and the jerkiness associated with it). The transmission isn't perfect because of that. It's not a problem, but it's not perfect either.
When you actually own an MR and use it as a DD, then you can comment on how it is to drive it as a DD. Until then, STFU.
When you learn a little bit more about the transmission in your car, we'll talk. Otherwise, I suggest that you don't tell people on this site to "STFU" simply because they don't agree with you're POV.
Here is my summary about this. Of course it is my opinion only.
There is a huge difference between the flappy shifters and the TC SST. So please dont refer to them as an example , they are just as far from each other then the MT to the TC SST.
The MR tranny is designed to do both world, the race Flappy versions of the transmissions are not. So there for they are the best on track. But the worst in traffic, very expensive to operate and maintain. End of story.
The TC SST is great what it is , but cant make them the best in both worlds, for many reasons. So to say that it is a best tranny for racing is just simply not true. In fact , this case the MT is still a better option for racing then the TC -SSt.
Also i would not call the TC SST an automatic transmission. I think the proper way is a half or semi automatic , since they DO have an automatic option , there for, they do have an automatic behavior. As my friend told me , if it walks and looks like a duck it is a duck. I dont see why hard to understand that.
Nothing wrong with that. Even if you can destroy the transmission with a wrong sifht , like you shift too much gear down , it still will be a semi automatic since still will have a automatic option.
I never tried it , but you can do a wrong gear change? Like 4th - to 2th, i mean too fast gear down when you actually over rev the engine? Like you can do it with the MT?
If you cant , then ultimately you dont have an absolute control over the tranny. So there for some situations you might have to wait to get in the right gear , vs the MT. Since the tranny has to going back by steps until reaches the right speed for the right gear. /Think about the longs straight ends with the hairpin, rally stuff/
There is a huge difference between the flappy shifters and the TC SST. So please dont refer to them as an example , they are just as far from each other then the MT to the TC SST.
The MR tranny is designed to do both world, the race Flappy versions of the transmissions are not. So there for they are the best on track. But the worst in traffic, very expensive to operate and maintain. End of story.
The TC SST is great what it is , but cant make them the best in both worlds, for many reasons. So to say that it is a best tranny for racing is just simply not true. In fact , this case the MT is still a better option for racing then the TC -SSt.
Also i would not call the TC SST an automatic transmission. I think the proper way is a half or semi automatic , since they DO have an automatic option , there for, they do have an automatic behavior. As my friend told me , if it walks and looks like a duck it is a duck. I dont see why hard to understand that.
Nothing wrong with that. Even if you can destroy the transmission with a wrong sifht , like you shift too much gear down , it still will be a semi automatic since still will have a automatic option.

I never tried it , but you can do a wrong gear change? Like 4th - to 2th, i mean too fast gear down when you actually over rev the engine? Like you can do it with the MT?
If you cant , then ultimately you dont have an absolute control over the tranny. So there for some situations you might have to wait to get in the right gear , vs the MT. Since the tranny has to going back by steps until reaches the right speed for the right gear. /Think about the longs straight ends with the hairpin, rally stuff/
The MR tranny is cool, so be it. However, Mitsubishi hasn't figured out a package that isn't a heavy pig with the softer MR suspension. Many other threads are dreaming about the dual clutch tranny with the performance of the GSR in terms of weight and handling. So until we can get this without all the loads of weight and the softer suspension, I can't see myself trading 0.99g for 0.97g + $$$.
Clutch pedal manuals are so freaking yesterday. Especially a 5-speed manual. Clutch pedal manuals seem a little archaic, and taking your foot off the gas, your hand off the wheel, pushing in the clutch, and moving a lever just to shift a gear is counterproductive IMO.
I usually using one hand to shift , so the other stays on the steering wheel. But i guess the two hand shift is kind of cool too.
Unless you are using AT mode the TC SST is require to move a shifter to change gears too. I guess that is also "counterproductive" in the TC SST.
Last edited by Robevo RS; Sep 8, 2010 at 05:42 PM.
If you don't understand that, perhaps we can use metaphors from golf like "body mechanics" and "muscle memory"
This thread is, after all, about MR vs GSR, not manual vs automatic manual. The GSR has better stock suspension when you look at numbers and get in it. I bought the car for its handling, so no doubt I made the best decision I can still see in retrospect.
You haven't been driving it fast enough yet if you're shifing a GSR. Two gears, 3rd and 4th.. If you can run 5th, great, PLENTY of time to even think about the shift, which happens damn quick. I guess I've used my hands and feet together for more years and its down to habit. I don't even realize what my feet do, they just do it just like steering and shifting man.
If you don't understand that, perhaps we can use metaphors from golf like "body mechanics" and "muscle memory"
If you don't understand that, perhaps we can use metaphors from golf like "body mechanics" and "muscle memory"

But isn't that the main difference between the two that sets them apart.
I personally like the MR because I lost my right hand years ago and always wanted a fast, turbo powered car but was never able to drive one due about 95% of them being manual and the small majority that were automatic sucked. I would love to drive an older VIII or IX but personally can't. Now I've driven a manual (little difficult but got the hang of it) but its too difficult on a day to day basis, and a little dangerous. Out of every sporty car that I've driven that has a "automatic" transmission, the MR wins hands down. the DSG is great but just feels like a little bit of a stronger automatic, while when I drove the MR I felt like I was driving a manual just without a clutch, it truley is an amazing transmission, and being the first edition of Mitsu's SST, its only going to get better and better, to where it can stand the same power mods as the GSR
But eventually, there are gonna be discussions/comparisons like these where owners of one kind make it sound like the other kind is bad or not as good. People need to accept these cars for what they are and that they are capable in their own ways.

Nope. Like I wrote, I bought the GSR for noticably better handling. Sorry, the MR feels (stock) like a damn STI, or nearly so, to me. I loathe the softness in the GSR when it starts letting me slide. Blame the weight, the sound deadening, and the different tuning of the different suspension.
Last edited by journeymansteve; Sep 8, 2010 at 07:43 PM. Reason: EDIT -- I SOOO WANT COILOVERS!
Well, the MR still equal, in time, if not better, on most magazine test when compared to the GSR, given it has the weight disadvantage and the *ahem* gearbox disadvantage. So I don't see how your argument is valid, unless you would only like to compare your car with other's through slaloms races, then yes, your car is better than that of a MR, in that aspect. The most you can argue is that MR cost more, which includes things that you DO NOT WANT, but it does not mean others won't enjoy the amenities.
Last edited by jackygor; Sep 8, 2010 at 07:56 PM.
I just bought a 08 MR and its my first of many performance cars in 10 years with this type of transmission and I'm absolutely in love!
I was weary at first.... but now I see the big picture with it. The SST is the future, don't expect it to go away either.
I was weary at first.... but now I see the big picture with it. The SST is the future, don't expect it to go away either.
Last edited by deanob; Sep 9, 2010 at 07:08 AM.






