Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2010 evo x vs 2011 wrx STI sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #46  
Departed's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
Originally Posted by RallyChamp
My engine? Not anymore, but I did own a 2008 STI and I know that the 2.5 is no junk. I did choose the STI over an Evo X after all.

Anyway, since the STI is gone and I'm about to purchase and Evo I thought signing up on this forum would be a good idea.
Glad you had a good experience with yours... My ej257 took a crap on me though. Stock form and everything on my 2006. After dealing with that and not making much power while throwing money at it like I'm trying to make it rain I had to switch to a better platform.

When you mod, the EJ257 just doesn't hold up like the 4g63 or the 4b11t nor make the same power mod for mod.

P.s. And they CONSTANTLY burn oil. Even when I broke in the new short block after replacement, it was still effed with burning oil (manual suggested break-in was followed). Either way, onto bigger and better things.

Last edited by Departed; Dec 6, 2010 at 01:12 PM.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #47  
RallyChamp's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by FJF
Volkswagen's FSI powerplant garnered similar honors. Now, some 4-5 years later, we find the motors suffering from a number of issues not supported by the factory. Awards are great, aren't they?
What are those issues you are talking about? I don't know of any serious issues with these engines. From what I've seen(owned two GTIs with the FSI engine) they are pretty much bullet proof.

Gobs of torque at low RPM and 30 mpg. Not to mention that a simple reflash(stage 1) takes the GTI from 207 to 300 lb-ft. Sorry, but the awards are well deserved.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #48  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by RallyChamp
What are those issues you are talking about?
Hmmm...let's see. There's the cam follower problem that leads to catastrophic engine failure. VW, themselves, admitted that it's a design flaw in '08, but the owners are stuck with it. Still, gotta love the awards. Then there are the astronomical carbon deposits that make cylinder heads look like they're suffering from Black Lung. Of course, if you install an aftermarket part the warranty is void, and if you don't you never have to buy coal again. VW redesigned the FSI motor and '08.5+ production reflects the change. Would you like me to go on? Similarly, a number of Audi RS4s have been plagued with severe carbon deposit issues. Owners spent many thousands trying to fix the problem, while the factory insists it's not there.

I don't know of any serious issues with these engines.
Clearly, there seem to be quite a few factors that you're not aware of. Perhaps hanging back and learning a bit is a better way to go, especially when coming on to a forum as a noob. Just sayin'.

From what I've seen(owned two GTIs with the FSI engine) they are pretty much bullet proof.
I've owned a number of Volkswagen two of which had the infamous 020 gearbox. The transmission was known to chew a hole in its housing. It was only a matter of time. I never had the problem with my cars, but that doesn't mean it didn't exist.

Gobs of torque at low RPM and 30 mpg. Not to mention that a simple reflash(stage 1) takes the GTI from 207 to 300 lb-ft.
An ARP-tuned GTI barely managed to hit 195whp/225ftlbs on STM's MD and it was out of breath by 5K. 225ft/lbs at low revs is what one needs in a FWD car. A jogger could take it off the line with its wheel spin. Please, enough with the magazine racing.

Sorry, but the awards are well deserved.
Tell that to the owners who are **** out of luck.

Last edited by Noize; Dec 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM. Reason: word filter. :)
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #49  
Kevin77's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by heavyD
No kidding. Who would have thought that suspension setup would alter handling characteristics. I'm not clear on how pointing out the obvious exonerates the STI for being an understeering pig? Understeer is inherent in AWD vehicles regardless of suspension setup. Cars like the EVO, certain Audi's and the GTR counter it with torque vectoring trickery. The STI doesn't have it and no amount of suspension tuning is going to change that. It can be improved but if we get into a modding discussion the EVO runs away anyway so what's the point?
You can get the STi to oversteer just by driving style, or I think more properly, by knowing the handling characteristics of the car you're driving. Watch this Top Gear video with Jeremy Clarkson (who only ever tries to power slide every car known to man). He can't get the STi to oversteer until he's told how to do it. (Yeah, it's from 2008 and therefore uses the hatchback STi, but you could probably do the same with the 2011 STi.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4CfWdoSOTk
(There appears to be an advertisement first.)

I'm not going to argue that changing the suspension can't have the same effect, or at least help some. But just that there are many factors involved.

I would have liked to have seen a lap in the Evo from the original post's video where the driver didn't slide it around a corner and what time it would have been.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #50  
Crester's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 700
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Boostfiend
I like the new STi's, especially lowered with wheels. I'm picking up a red 08 wagon in a week and lowering it on BBS LM's. They're better daily drivers in my opinion.


That doesn't really look special to me... just looks like a white sedan with a tow hook and rims.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #51  
RallyChamp's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by FJF
Hmmm...let's see. There's the cam follower problem that leads to catastrophic engine failure. VW, themselves, admitted that it's a design flaw in '08, but the owners are stuck with it. Still, gotta love the awards. Then there are the astronomical carbon deposits that make cylinder heads look like they're suffering from Black Lung. Of course, if you install an aftermarket part the warranty is void, and if you don't you never have to buy coal again. Would you like me to go on?



An ARP-tuned GTI barely managed to hit 195whp/225ftlbs on STM's MD and it was out of breath by 5K.



Tell that to the owners who are **** out of luck.
So you take a few extremely MINOR issues(cam follower, carbon deposits) easily avoidable with proper maintanance and make it sound like that fantastic engine is in fact a time bomb? Toyota had sludge issues for years and is still consider one of the most reliable brands. Please...and complaining about VW not covering cars that are modded(a false claim)... when you own a ....Mitsubishi, is downright hilarious. VW or Subaru don't ask you to pay for clutch replacement on a car that is 2 weeks old, like Mitsubishi. Subaru, VW, are staying behind their products. Mitsubishi ...not so much. Those are the facts.

The GTI is at 195 whp stock. Check your sources.

I gather that when you own a Mitsubishi you are never out of luck.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #52  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by RallyChamp
So you take a few extremely MINOR issues(cam follower, carbon deposits) easily avoidable with proper maintanance and make it sound like that fantastic engine is in fact a time bomb?Maintenance that involes opening the head? Right. Toyota had sludge issues for years and is still consider one of the most reliable brands. Please...and complaining about VW not covering cars that are modded(a false claim)... when you own a ....Mitsubishi, is downright hilarious. VW or Subaru don't ask you to pay for clutch replacement on a car that is 2 weeks old, like Mitsubishi. Subaru, VW, are staying behind their products. Mitsubishi ...not so much. Those are the facts.
Actually, I posted the facts. They are what they are. If you consider them minor, more power to you. The multitude of folks living with with noticeably decreased performance leading to catastrophic failure, and zero recourse, feel differently.

The GTI is at 195 whp stock. Check your sources.
We're talking WHP. If you don't mind my saying, not realizing the difference points to a lengthy learning curve. FWIW, I was at the dyno when the car ran.

I gather that when you own a Mitsubishi you are never out of luck.
Now that you mention it, my Evo has been the single most reliable car I've owned in 30+ years behind the wheel. Thanks for asking.

Last edited by FJF; Dec 6, 2010 at 11:25 AM.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #53  
heavyD's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by RallyChamp
The GTI is at 195 whp stock. Check your sources.
How are we supposed to take you seriously when you don't know the difference between whp and bhp?
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #54  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
I think he is saying some of them make 195whp stock. FWIW, the car makes 200/207, and it pretty underrated from the factory. The way some dynos read around here, I would not doubt that a strong stocker could make 195 somewhere. LOL.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #55  
RallyChamp's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by FJF
Actually, I posted the facts. They are what they are. The multitude of folks living with with noticeably decreased performance leading to catastrophic failure, and zero recourse, feel differently.
That "multitude of folks" are in fact only a few owners. VW 2.0T is a very reliable turbo engine with some of the lowest failure rates even on heavily modified engines.


Originally Posted by FJF
We're talking WHP.
Yes, we are talking WHP. Just google "stock GTI WHP"...



Originally Posted by FJF
Now that you mention it, my Evo has been the single most reliable car I've owned in 30+ years behind the wheel.
You must have picked the right color.

Anyway, we should probably get back to bashing Subaru. Those bastards!

Last edited by RallyChamp; Dec 6, 2010 at 01:59 PM.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #56  
xmuscle's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: laguna hills
Ownen 2010 STI SE - After 1 test drive of the 2010 Evo X - Now own the X

-M
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #57  
Tuneman7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY
I'd love to take a test drive, probably the only way I'd be able to split the two now that the STI Sedan is back and the egg 5 door is just another body style. The only thing I dislike about the Evo X would probably be the 5 Speed for highway driving, though the STI sedan's looks are still a bit suspect.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #58  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by heavyD
No kidding. Who would have thought that suspension setup would alter handling characteristics. I'm not clear on how pointing out the obvious exonerates the STI for being an understeering pig? Understeer is inherent in AWD vehicles regardless of suspension setup. Cars like the EVO, certain Audi's and the GTR counter it with torque vectoring trickery. The STI doesn't have it and no amount of suspension tuning is going to change that. It can be improved but if we get into a modding discussion the EVO runs away anyway so what's the point?
you are wrong. and you've put a little too much faith into active rear differentials, but that's a different story. not only will sti oversteer naturally with a slightly different suspension set up, it will power oversteer, and if you put in a beefier mechanical it will REALLY power oversteer.

oversteer/understeer/neutrality IS a characteristic of the car that can be changed by suspension adjustments. subaru sets the sti to understeer from the factory. jeez.
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #59  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by Kevin77
You can get the STi to oversteer just by driving style, or I think more properly, by knowing the handling characteristics of the car you're driving. Watch this Top Gear video with Jeremy Clarkson (who only ever tries to power slide every car known to man). He can't get the STi to oversteer until he's told how to do it. (Yeah, it's from 2008 and therefore uses the hatchback STi, but you could probably do the same with the 2011 STi.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4CfWdoSOTk
(There appears to be an advertisement first.)

I'm not going to argue that changing the suspension can't have the same effect, or at least help some. But just that there are many factors involved.

I would have liked to have seen a lap in the Evo from the original post's video where the driver didn't slide it around a corner and what time it would have been.
For most video reviews of any cars, they take shots of the car powersliding just for the camera, but drive serious when they measure the lap
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #60  
Crester's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 700
Likes: 1
From: Canada
That may be true... but what is the point in discussing "what if's"??? If you change this on the Subie then this would happen... if you change that then that will happen. Point is that the way Subaru makes the car it is an understeering pig.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:34 AM.