Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Evo X Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2017, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin_White19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Essex County, New Jersey
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo X Build

Hi all! I'm brand new to the club and I currently daily drive a Scion FR-S but one of my dream cars is an Evo X. Id like to build it up over time but am wondering what I should look for when searching on the market.

Anything from a '11-'14 GSR is ideal but not a necessity. I'd love to build the motor (possibly bore it with upgraded internals), add E85 and a twin scroll that will allow for quicker peak boost times and potential for around 450AWHP. I would eventually beef up the trans and t-case for longevity.

Are these reasonable expectations and things I can look for in the used market? I'd love to hear your input and talk cars.

Thanks
-Kevin
Old Apr 11, 2017, 01:16 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ChipperEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 499
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
if you are looking at 450 WHP, I think a built motor is overkill. I think there are plenty of builds with just a turbo swap and E85 with supporting mods that will get you similar numbers.

Of course, you can over build it for future growth which is never a bad thing. Unless you are trying to launch your car from light to light every where you go, GSR trans are pretty stout.
Old Apr 11, 2017, 04:40 PM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
- Stock turbo / manifold is twin scroll
- Stock motor is fine for 450whp
- Stock turbo is good for 350-380whp
- Simple stock frame (OEM turbine/compressor housing) upgraded turbo will give you 450whp
- OEM t-case and transmission is just fine for 450whp unless you want to launch 10x a day for 365 days.
The following users liked this post:
Cflo23 (Apr 13, 2017)
Old Apr 11, 2017, 06:05 PM
  #4  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
KRome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 57
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
- Stock turbo / manifold is twin scroll
- Stock motor is fine for 450whp
- Stock turbo is good for 350-380whp
- Simple stock frame (OEM turbine/compressor housing) upgraded turbo will give you 450whp
- OEM t-case and transmission is just fine for 450whp unless you want to launch 10x a day for 365 days.


With what I bolded in your post being said, is 400whp with e85 stock turbo pushing it too far?
Old Apr 11, 2017, 07:12 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin_White19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Essex County, New Jersey
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KRome
With what I bolded in your post being said, is 400whp with e85 stock turbo pushing it too far?
Without having any dyno data in front of me just knowing the engineering of them, I'd say to get the boost you'd need to do that the turbo inlet to compressor radius is too much of a flow restrictor.
If you want to run E85 either port, polish and upgrade the turbo internals or upgrade the turbo size. With the former you'll get the power and quicker spool. With the latter you'll get better power potential with similar spool to stock.
Someone with real world experience should give their opinion before taking mine as fact though.
Old Apr 11, 2017, 08:04 PM
  #6  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin_White19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Essex County, New Jersey
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChipperEvo
if you are looking at 450 WHP, I think a built motor is overkill. I think there are plenty of builds with just a turbo swap and E85 with supporting mods that will get you similar numbers.

Of course, you can over build it for future growth which is never a bad thing. Unless you are trying to launch your car from light to light every where you go, GSR trans are pretty stout.
I have no doubts the stock drivetrain is robust and can handle up to 500 ft-lb of torque, however the turbo lag associated with those kind of numbers on the stock frame turbo would be abysmal (for me). I'd like to have as quick of a spool as possible at a power rating of around 450 which becomes quite the balancing act between boost pressure and turbo size. An easy way to do this is to increase displacement and run E85. So if I increase bore, might as well build up the engine. (I'd rather increase bore because I love RPM.)

Speaking to the trans, I'd rebuild that for the strength as well as changing the final drive (the Jacks build) to be geared for higher speed due to the increased output of the engine. Plus I'm a child and launches are fun.

-Kevin
Old Apr 11, 2017, 10:04 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02modlanceroz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Latrobe, Pa
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin_White19
I have no doubts the stock drivetrain is robust and can handle up to 500 ft-lb of torque, however the turbo lag associated with those kind of numbers on the stock frame turbo would be abysmal (for me). I'd like to have as quick of a spool as possible at a power rating of around 450 which becomes quite the balancing act between boost pressure and turbo size. An easy way to do this is to increase displacement and run E85. So if I increase bore, might as well build up the engine. (I'd rather increase bore because I love RPM.)

Speaking to the trans, I'd rebuild that for the strength as well as changing the final drive (the Jacks build) to be geared for higher speed due to the increased output of the engine. Plus I'm a child and launches are fun.

-Kevin
I have a stock frame turbo. The turbo lag is very minimal. It comes on a little later than the stock turbo, but I can't tell much of a difference. I'm running a 3576r and I'm laying down around 465whp 375tq on pump gas 93. I'm going to flex fuel in a month or so and that will take me to 500whp and 400tq. Motor is pretty good stock, just keep the torque to 400 or less.
Old Apr 12, 2017, 05:34 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ChipperEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 499
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin_White19
I have no doubts the stock drivetrain is robust and can handle up to 500 ft-lb of torque, however the turbo lag associated with those kind of numbers on the stock frame turbo would be abysmal (for me). I'd like to have as quick of a spool as possible at a power rating of around 450 which becomes quite the balancing act between boost pressure and turbo size. An easy way to do this is to increase displacement and run E85. So if I increase bore, might as well build up the engine. (I'd rather increase bore because I love RPM.)

Speaking to the trans, I'd rebuild that for the strength as well as changing the final drive (the Jacks build) to be geared for higher speed due to the increased output of the engine. Plus I'm a child and launches are fun.

-Kevin
as already mentioned above, with stock frame turbos, you probably lose about 500 RPM. maybe just build the motor and head to rev to 9K instead of boring out the engine? I mean larger displacement is always welcome but that seems like a lot of work and money for 450 WHP that can be done on a stock engine.

Again, may be you are just over doing it for future growth which is
Old Apr 12, 2017, 01:47 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
static_set's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Race City USA
Posts: 205
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin_White19
Speaking to the trans, I'd rebuild that for the strength as well as changing the final drive (the Jacks build) to be geared for higher speed due to the increased output of the engine. Plus I'm a child and launches are fun.

-Kevin

why? the stock GSR transmission is very strong - Jacks produces top notch stuff and if mine ever blows then that's where I'm going to send it... but "rebuilding for S&Gs just to be safe" isn't necessary. If you're planning on launching this thing to the moon, then you should be more concerned with flywheel/clutch durability.


Changing to the 4.23 final would really tone the car down in a way I don't think you'll like unless you have big power. It kind of puts cars 400whp and below on Ritalin. Personally, I enjoy the gearing the way it is and most likely after owning one for a bit you'll appreciate it too.


-asher
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pal215
Project Cars / Build Threads
914
Feb 7, 2023 06:22 PM
Kins
Project Cars / Build Threads
155
May 15, 2015 07:41 AM
Demon_ni2
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
698
Aug 11, 2013 06:25 PM
WickedIXMR
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
67
Mar 13, 2009 01:43 PM
djskyy
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Jun 11, 2006 10:21 AM



Quick Reply: Evo X Build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.