ETS 3" FMIC Dyno Results
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
ETS 3" FMIC Dyno Results
This is on a car running a HFC and 91 octane
Mods:
FORGE intake box
Buschur cone filter
Samco I/C hoses
T-bolt clamps
ETS 3" FMIC
stock coated/ported mani
titek o2 housing
Garage HRS DP
Vishnu HFC
Greeddy Ti
Denso 720cc
Walbro 255
GST boost line
GST custom tune

Mods:
FORGE intake box
Buschur cone filter
Samco I/C hoses
T-bolt clamps
ETS 3" FMIC
stock coated/ported mani
titek o2 housing
Garage HRS DP
Vishnu HFC
Greeddy Ti
Denso 720cc
Walbro 255
GST boost line
GST custom tune

Last edited by JDMevoBOOST; Jun 27, 2007 at 04:09 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
Well my car was sensitive to boost before...but after the FMIC the sensitivity was gone. So I turned it up a little.
So I am running a bit more boost than the run 10 days ago (1 psi more) Tapering from 21.3 to 19 on this run....was running 20.7 tapering to 18psi the run 10 days ago. The temps on both days were similar....both sunny days.
So I am running a bit more boost than the run 10 days ago (1 psi more) Tapering from 21.3 to 19 on this run....was running 20.7 tapering to 18psi the run 10 days ago. The temps on both days were similar....both sunny days.
The fat spots in your curve look to show considerably larger gains than the peak numbers listed on the dyno sheet. You'll also be able to run more boost than with the stock intercooler without knocking on pump fuel and do so repeatedly with intake temperatures remaining almost the same
Tom
Tom
Last edited by ETS Michael; Jul 5, 2007 at 11:42 AM.
Plus, it's not really about the increase in peak power... look at the entire curve.
I don't know why people stay concerned with peak numbers.
Seems to be a kick-*** piece (like the rest of the ETS line).
I don't know why people stay concerned with peak numbers.
Seems to be a kick-*** piece (like the rest of the ETS line).
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
To answer the questions GST makes custom pills to better control boost at higher psi as you can see from my graph. Basically its for stealth factor. You cant turn it up like an MBC, you need ecuflash. But I like the stealthiness of it.
Yah my car is a little down on power compared to some IX's around here. But I think the HFC is the reason for that. It's a Ceramic Cat, and basically is choking the car a little.
This is also a low reading dyno as it is a mustang dyno. And the temps were like 80ish i believe in the dyno rooms and it was muggy from other cars before me. So I think in cold weather the car would read much higher and if I ditched the cat for a test pipe I'd be making 10-15 wtq/whp more accross the board. And I could run more boost as well if I did that, but I'm trying to stay somewhat environmentally friendly. CA cops crack down hard on test pipe users.
Yah my car is a little down on power compared to some IX's around here. But I think the HFC is the reason for that. It's a Ceramic Cat, and basically is choking the car a little.
This is also a low reading dyno as it is a mustang dyno. And the temps were like 80ish i believe in the dyno rooms and it was muggy from other cars before me. So I think in cold weather the car would read much higher and if I ditched the cat for a test pipe I'd be making 10-15 wtq/whp more accross the board. And I could run more boost as well if I did that, but I'm trying to stay somewhat environmentally friendly. CA cops crack down hard on test pipe users.
On the stock turbo the 3" intercooler will be more than sufficient for your cooling needs. Up to just shy of 500whp the 3" is a great choice, past that you'd want the 3.5" version 
Tom

Tom
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
razorlab
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
5165
Aug 11, 2024 07:56 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
48
Jan 28, 2015 04:43 PM










