Notices
ExtremeTurboSystems.com – WA Custom Intercoolers, Intercooler Kits, Turbo Kits and Performance Parts. [Visit Site]

ETS 3" FMIC Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #1  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
ETS 3" FMIC Dyno Results

This is on a car running a HFC and 91 octane

Mods:

FORGE intake box
Buschur cone filter
Samco I/C hoses
T-bolt clamps
ETS 3" FMIC
stock coated/ported mani
titek o2 housing
Garage HRS DP
Vishnu HFC
Greeddy Ti
Denso 720cc
Walbro 255
GST boost line
GST custom tune




Last edited by JDMevoBOOST; Jun 27, 2007 at 04:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
S@nt0s's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
6whp and 7ft lbs peak jsut with FMIC??
how was the day compared to the baseline past a week earlier?

i just mounted my FMIC myself on my VIII
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #3  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
Well my car was sensitive to boost before...but after the FMIC the sensitivity was gone. So I turned it up a little.

So I am running a bit more boost than the run 10 days ago (1 psi more) Tapering from 21.3 to 19 on this run....was running 20.7 tapering to 18psi the run 10 days ago. The temps on both days were similar....both sunny days.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #4  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
The fat spots in your curve look to show considerably larger gains than the peak numbers listed on the dyno sheet. You'll also be able to run more boost than with the stock intercooler without knocking on pump fuel and do so repeatedly with intake temperatures remaining almost the same

Tom

Last edited by ETS Michael; Jul 5, 2007 at 11:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Plus, it's not really about the increase in peak power... look at the entire curve.

I don't know why people stay concerned with peak numbers.

Seems to be a kick-*** piece (like the rest of the ETS line).
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #6  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Nice numbers ! Just need to slap in a set of cams and you'll be good to go !
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 06:19 AM
  #7  
kduncan01's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
What is the "GST boost line"??
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #8  
BigBallin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: omaha
numbers seem low on a IX with those mods, and why the bigger injectors?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #9  
ultimatesteve's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa CA
Originally Posted by kduncan01
What is the "GST boost line"??
most likely a pill in a tube, like works "special boost tube"
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #10  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
To answer the questions GST makes custom pills to better control boost at higher psi as you can see from my graph. Basically its for stealth factor. You cant turn it up like an MBC, you need ecuflash. But I like the stealthiness of it.

Yah my car is a little down on power compared to some IX's around here. But I think the HFC is the reason for that. It's a Ceramic Cat, and basically is choking the car a little.

This is also a low reading dyno as it is a mustang dyno. And the temps were like 80ish i believe in the dyno rooms and it was muggy from other cars before me. So I think in cold weather the car would read much higher and if I ditched the cat for a test pipe I'd be making 10-15 wtq/whp more accross the board. And I could run more boost as well if I did that, but I'm trying to stay somewhat environmentally friendly. CA cops crack down hard on test pipe users.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #11  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
And the reason for the bigger injectors is I plan to go green sometime soon at higher boost and better fuel than 91 octane
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 11:28 PM
  #12  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by BigBallin
numbers seem low on a IX with those mods, and why the bigger injectors?
Perfectly in-line with what catted 9's do with the mods he has on that dyno.

His stock baseline was 233whp/238wtq
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #13  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
Is there a Benefit from going to a 3.5 Vs. a 3.0 on the stock turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #14  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
On the stock turbo the 3" intercooler will be more than sufficient for your cooling needs. Up to just shy of 500whp the 3" is a great choice, past that you'd want the 3.5" version

Tom
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
razorlab
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
5165
Aug 11, 2024 07:56 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
48
Jan 28, 2015 04:43 PM
GST Motorsports
Evo X Dyno Results
117
Feb 16, 2010 12:32 PM
razorlab
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
32
Nov 8, 2008 08:57 AM
razorlab
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
75
Jan 31, 2008 08:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.