Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Why is there so much hate towards the EVO X?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #16  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Originally Posted by gilliam
whats mmna??
Mitsubishi Motors North America. I recommend searching before you show up yourself like that again.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #17  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Go back and read posts from when the Evo VIII was announced. This is nothing.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #18  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Do you guys know what car Mitsubishi is targeting its X with? Clue: It's not the STI. Answer this and you'll understand more on why there is so much "hate," as you describe it. Here's another question that may help you guys understand more: What was the focus of the Evo? Or, what's the new focus of the X?
I would not use an Edmunds article to be the determining factor as to what Mitsu is doing with their new flagship car, unless it quoted designers and engineers directly. I believe it was SCC that quoted Dr. Evo himself as saying the only target for the Evo X, was to beat the Evo IX. Period. That should be enough to quiet the fanboys that want to hate, but it won't. Fanboys talk trash, what ya gonna do.

Originally Posted by gilliam
whats mmna??
Mitsubishi Motors North America
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #19  
gilliam's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: virginia
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Mitsubishi Motors North America. I recommend searching before you show up yourself like that again.
i reccomend you **** off cause it was just a question dick
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #20  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I would not use an Edmunds article to be the determining factor as to what Mitsu is doing with their new flagship car, unless it quoted designers and engineers directly. I believe it was SCC that quoted Dr. Evo himself as saying the only target for the Evo X, was to beat the Evo IX. Period. That should be enough to quiet the fanboys that want to hate, but it won't. Fanboys talk trash, what ya gonna do.
However, directions change. Dr. Evo doesn't make the final decision as to what Mitsubishi Motors will do with the X. It's the executives that are charged with bringing Mitsubishi Motors out of the American gutter. I'm sure if Dr. Evo were to have his way, he'd keep the Evo as raw as ever, the focus to remain on performance.

Before someone gets emotional, let it be known that I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest here. I'm offering some food for thought, some fuel to feed the discussion.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #21  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Gilliam, I recommend that you keep it civil and tone it down. Hell, I recommend you edit your thread before the mods see it. Such attitude is gonna get you banned from this forum fast. Just keeping it real, buddy. Searching is the way to go. Question in your mind and search with your computer. You'd be amazed at what you can find on your own.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #22  
rane's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 32
From: VT
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Before someone gets emotional, let it be known that I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest here. I'm offering some food for thought, some fuel to feed the discussion.
Round here, we call it flamebait! lol

jk, I hear what you're saying, and in my opinion you're absolutely right. The moneymakers are the ones that make the car more accessible. To me, the idea of more kids owning evo's and doing their gangsta lean takes away from the purity of the car, but oh well, it makes more sales for Mitsu.

Then again, they thought making a PG-13 Die Hard (blasphemy!) would get more butts in the seats...what's that movie at now? 9th? 10th place? lol

It's a gamble whether or not the new Evo will be embraced by a larger audience, one not quite so dedicated to driving as the "purists" out there, but only time will tell.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:42 AM
  #23  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Here's another question that may help you guys understand more: What was the focus of the Evo? Or, what's the new focus of the X?
The X is still targeted for WRC Group-N. That part hasn't changed at all. And you can bet that the X should perform on par with, if not above the Cedia based Evos. If can do that _and_ give us a more comfy car, then I'm all for it.

And people reaaaallly need to get over the paddle shifters. Geeez! If you don't like the semi-automatic, then buy ... the ... 5-speed. The inclusion of a non-manual tranny is long overdue and will only help to sell the car in the U.S.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:42 AM
  #24  
rane's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 32
From: VT
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
Gilliam, I recommend that you keep it civil and tone it down. Hell, I recommend you edit your thread before the mods see it. Such attitude is gonna get you banned from this forum fast. Just keeping it real, buddy. Searching is the way to go. Question in your mind and search with your computer. You'd be amazed at what you can find on your own.
Calm down. He just asked a simple question and you gave him attitude for it. How do you expect someone to respond when you speak to them in such a way? Remember, sarcasm is near-impossible to pick up on a forum.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #25  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
I'm completely calm. Boring calm. I understand what you mean, rane. However, I believe simple questions should be answered with Google, not while interrupting.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #26  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
However, directions change. Dr. Evo doesn't make the final decision as to what Mitsubishi Motors will do with the X. It's the executives that are charged with bringing Mitsubishi Motors out of the American gutter. I'm sure if Dr. Evo were to have his way, he'd keep the Evo as raw as ever, the focus to remain on performance.
I understand that. But what you just said was speculation. What I said was a factual quote. I choose to believe that they are going to make the car better then the IX because of what the lead designer wants. Not speculate that the car will suck becuase of "what might happen."

Before someone gets emotional, let it be known that I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest here. I'm offering some food for thought, some fuel to feed the discussion.
Then don't be a douche when someone asks a simple question.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #27  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Factual, yes, but how old was that article? 2005-ish maybe?

As for me needing to calm down or being a douche, that's fair. I easily could've been perceived to have been showing an attitude. That was not my intention, however. I'm sorry to those whom I offended, sincerely.

Last edited by EVO X Owner-2-B; Jul 7, 2007 at 09:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #28  
Daniel_4g63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: casa grande, az
I believe the CT9A wasnt very well recieved either when the CP9A when out.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #29  
EVO X Owner-2-B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Seattle & Portland
Originally Posted by Daniel_4g63
I believe the CT9A wasnt very well recieved either when the CP9A when out.
Focus-based performer for a focus-based performer. It was more a question of looks then, right? I'm seriously asking here.

And just because the X will be softer, less hard-edged, doesn't mean it's gonna suck. Really, do M3s suck?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 09:43 AM
  #30  
gilliam's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: virginia
Originally Posted by EVO X Owner-2-B
I'm completely calm. Boring calm. I understand what you mean, rane. However, I believe simple questions should be answered with Google, not while interrupting.
i'm so sorry for interupting a thread Its not like i asked you specifically, that acronym kept coming up so i asked and it took you what.........half a second to type it??
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 PM.