Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Confirmed by Mitsubishi high offical: Lancer Evolution is no more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:47 AM
  #691  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
In my mind the Evo died when they stopped making the IX.

I find myself lusting over older cars (70s, 80s, 90s)

Easier to modify, less legality to worry about.

I'd rather spend less on an old car shell, put 20,000$ into the body to make it new, and install a powertrain of my own choice.

Thoughts that come to mind:

RB26 S30Z, 2JZGTE AE86, 20B FD3S. I've even been thinking about building a V12 Turbo Testarossa. Any of these are much more impressive than any new car.

Last edited by Jp7; May 18, 2011 at 12:55 AM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 02:16 PM
  #692  
MRDC5S's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
dang
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 04:19 PM
  #693  
H Jensen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
From: NorCal, Nevada, Military locations
Originally Posted by zeckgx
And guess what... Gas is a finite resource so it is going to cost $12.50/gallon in 10 years if you still run petrol.
Gas is only as finite as the media, and oil companies says it is. There is more oil in the mid west than twice that of Saudi Arabia. Get your facts straight.
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 11:34 AM
  #694  
zeckgx's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by H Jensen
Gas is only as finite as the media, and oil companies says it is. There is more oil in the mid west than twice that of Saudi Arabia. Get your facts straight.

Maybe true but it still can be used up so that there is no mere there.......I.E. FINITE!!! Learn the definition

Anyways it will still cost that much because the shear amount of environmental permits required. Like electricity could be half as much if they would let is build a nuke plant.
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #695  
powercreator's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra Ca
Better resale value for are 8,9,& 10's
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #696  
Grant's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Jp7
I've even been thinking about building a V12 Turbo Testarossa. Any of these are much more impressive than any new car.
Testarossa had a Flat-12, not a V-12...
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #697  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Originally Posted by Jp7
In my mind the Evo died when they stopped making the IX.

I find myself lusting over older cars (70s, 80s, 90s)

Easier to modify, less legality to worry about.

I'd rather spend less on an old car shell, put 20,000$ into the body to make it new, and install a powertrain of my own choice.

Thoughts that come to mind:

RB26 S30Z, 2JZGTE AE86, 20B FD3S. I've even been thinking about building a V12 Turbo Testarossa. Any of these are much more impressive than any new car.
Impressive yes, but you can't drive them like you can a new car. 10k miles and you're doing a complete engine rebuild. It costs a lot of money for that ancient performance. If you want to work on the car all the time, or just garage queen it, it would definitely be fun.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #698  
newmitsuowner's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Originally Posted by migs647
Impressive yes, but you can't drive them like you can a new car. 10k miles and you're doing a complete engine rebuild. It costs a lot of money for that ancient performance. If you want to work on the car all the time, or just garage queen it, it would definitely be fun.
not unless you replace the pistons, stroker, cams, etc. the body of the engines should never fail. unless you beat it to hell and back. the engine is one of the things that does last forever.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #699  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 112
From: Midwest USA
Originally Posted by Grant
Testarossa had a Flat-12, not a V-12...
I wasn't referring to the stock Flat 12, I meant V-12.

Originally Posted by migs647
Impressive yes, but you can't drive them like you can a new car. 10k miles and you're doing a complete engine rebuild. It costs a lot of money for that ancient performance. If you want to work on the car all the time, or just garage queen it, it would definitely be fun.
Those are old cars, with newer engines.

FYI - I put less than 500 miles on my IX all year last year. So far in 2011 (half a year) I've driven my IX 19 miles.

Originally Posted by newmitsuowner
not unless you replace the pistons, stroker, cams, etc. the body of the engines should never fail. unless you beat it to hell and back. the engine is one of the things that does last forever.
replace the stroker huh? Buying a car that I like, the last thing I would look at is the engine. I don't even care if it has an engine. Rather have a body in excellent shape. Mechanical work is nothing compared to body, paint and cosmetics.

Last edited by Jp7; May 20, 2011 at 03:29 PM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 06:33 PM
  #700  
ErnGotti's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Scotia, NY
Think about how much a 96 Supra turbo, 300GT VR4, 300ZX TT or 93 RX7 TT are worth nowadays...Evo X's, with their unique drivetrain and suspension will be worth alot more than any regular used car. They will be hard to find, even harder to find unmodified or beat, so they will all be worth money even with blown engines and 100k on the body...IMO
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #701  
acidtonic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 746
Likes: 1
From: Detroit
I drove mine nearly 12,000 miles and my bluebook value dropped a whopping $650 in my area code. Let's see even a high priced BMW retain value like that..... Those are free miles practically.
Reply
Old May 21, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #702  
DeeezNuuuts83's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 27
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by ErnGotti
Think about how much a 96 Supra turbo, 300GT VR4, 300ZX TT or 93 RX7 TT are worth nowadays...Evo X's, with their unique drivetrain and suspension will be worth alot more than any regular used car. They will be hard to find, even harder to find unmodified or beat, so they will all be worth money even with blown engines and 100k on the body...IMO
I don't think that will apply to the Evo X, as least not nearly as much as it will to the IXs and VIIIs, respectively.
Reply
Old May 21, 2011 | 09:18 AM
  #703  
rdgsdsm's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Reading, PA
i think it is all a bunch of stupid bs..... nothing we can do can do about it but the government/world is going smaller and green with all these new emissions and such. we think we have it bad with cars look at the emissions for a big truck and all the extra **** they added to them the past couple years. All the new big rigs are equipped with DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) systems. they only make a 23 gallon tank for them and can on go 4k miles on a full tank. so with all that just added they now have to buy this fluid (which is 86% water) every trip they make taking away from their earnings , along with a the electrical stuff to go with it that can fail... also if they run out they can only run the truck for another hour on a empty tank before it shuts down for good....

in all... these new emissions regulations that they keep coming out with are a total load of ****.... i dont see many if any in the future performance cars being made unless they are some sort of hybrid/electric car
Reply
Old May 21, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #704  
JSchool's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Looking at the sketches of the next Lancer, I can't say I'm really sad to see the Evo go. It deserved a better looking car. Thank god I have a 2009!
Reply
Old May 21, 2011 | 03:17 PM
  #705  
JSchool's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Crester
You say that... but people are still buying Subaru STi hatchbacks regardless of how many people say it's fugly.

Drove past one of those the other day and I have to say... it was damn nice looking! I'd probably pick it over this concept Evo .
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 AM.