If someone has the new motor trend!!
Originally Posted by Conduit
I think this is going to be much closer than the previous comparo. Subaru has made some pretty major refinements to be competitive with the MR. As it stands, it looks like the MR is going to be about 4k more than the STi.
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers,NY
I don't feel like scanning it right now, but I'll give you some of the results....
2005 EVO MR 2005 STI
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1
Dynamometer 238bhp@6400 233bhp@5500
At the wheels 248lb-ft@3750 249lb-ft@4000
2005 EVO MR 2005 STI
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1
Dynamometer 238bhp@6400 233bhp@5500
At the wheels 248lb-ft@3750 249lb-ft@4000
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 1
From: Turkey Town (Gobble-Gobble)
man theres no way that they could be that identical... the evo is rated at 276hp sti is rated at 300.... If thats true figures for the USS model then WOW... but if they are using a FQ model then shame on them
Evolving Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
And the weight is within something like 17 lbs of each other. Could be the six speed, but those seem like odd numbers to me. Even the traps are funny. 100 for an STi? Ratios didnt change, neither did the powerband. What gives? Is Mitsubishi suddenly grossly underrating the hp in the MR? Why do that? Those figures almost seem reversed. For example, how can the MR be making more torque at a lower rpm when it has .5L less displacement, a larger turbo and no VVT stuff??
Let me say here that if these are actually correct, than the Evo got a lot better! Awesome
Let me say here that if these are actually correct, than the Evo got a lot better! Awesome
Last edited by Conduit; Sep 1, 2004 at 01:26 AM.
Originally Posted by Acerxz
I don't feel like scanning it right now, but I'll give you some of the results....
2005 EVO MR 2005 STI
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1
Dynamometer 238bhp@6400 233bhp@5500
At the wheels 248lb-ft@3750 249lb-ft@4000
2005 EVO MR 2005 STI
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1
Dynamometer 238bhp@6400 233bhp@5500
At the wheels 248lb-ft@3750 249lb-ft@4000
Anyways, i'm more concerned about the handling. What are the lap times and handling figures?
The MR lapped Willow Springs at 1:34.38. The STi at 1:35.37.
600ft slalom, MR 70.1mph, STi 69.7
skidpad, MR .92, STi .90
This is the American MR edition. The MR dyno'd higher than the STi by 6 AWHP. They said it seems like either Mitsu underrated the HP figure, or Subaru overrated theirs.
600ft slalom, MR 70.1mph, STi 69.7
skidpad, MR .92, STi .90
This is the American MR edition. The MR dyno'd higher than the STi by 6 AWHP. They said it seems like either Mitsu underrated the HP figure, or Subaru overrated theirs.
Originally Posted by Acerxz
2005 EVO MR 2005 STI
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1.
0-30 1.5 1.2
0-60 4.7 4.7
0-100 13.1 13.2
1/4 mile 13.3@102.2 13.3@100.1.
Originally Posted by 4ce fed
The MR lapped Willow Springs at 1:34.38. The STi at 1:35.37.
600ft slalom, MR 70.1mph, STi 69.7
skidpad, MR .92, STi .90
This is the American MR edition. The MR dyno'd higher than the STi by 6 AWHP. They said it seems like either Mitsu underrated the HP figure, or Subaru overrated theirs.
600ft slalom, MR 70.1mph, STi 69.7
skidpad, MR .92, STi .90
This is the American MR edition. The MR dyno'd higher than the STi by 6 AWHP. They said it seems like either Mitsu underrated the HP figure, or Subaru overrated theirs.
0-60 in 4.69 sec,
1/4 in 13.08 @ 105.12 mph
600ft Slalom, 71.4
0-100=12.45 sec.
Although tested at different times, the 03 without the active diff and front limited slip is pretty good.
Last edited by modvp; Sep 1, 2004 at 05:59 AM.
Link to the "old" MT article can be found here: http://motortrend.com/features/scene...est/index.html
Last edited by modvp; Sep 1, 2004 at 08:08 AM.
