Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

Turbo kit from Mitsubishi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #241  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
There is no way mitsubishi will make a warranty approved turbo kit for 3000$, no way in hell. An RRM kit is more than that and they don't have to worry about 100% fitment, ease of install, tuning, driveability, etc. I would wager if they make a kit it'll be 5000$+ for just the kit and probably another 1000$ or so for install from a dealership. To help you understand, I recently bought an SPT short shifter for my car. The cost of the part was 250ish (500$ if I bought it from the dealership) and install will be another 100$. That's 350$ for a short shifter just to maintain the warranty.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #242  
chetman7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: NEW York
speculation says the railliart is a 2.0 AWD turbo just like the evox but detuned.

so I don't think it would be capatible if its AWD system w' DSG
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #243  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Don't see why it wouldn't work if the engine is the same.

Last edited by ambystom01; Jan 27, 2008 at 06:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #244  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by BaD2RaSS


you know what its because of people like this guy that i dont share what i find out through head representatives from MMSA with anyone. He is probably just some punk *** ***** who thinks he knows everything. His mommy probably bought the lancer for him if he even has one. This is not my Opinion this is coming straight from The Mitsu sales rep for my district. So I will no longer voice any of my "opinions" I will just wait until next year and when the RA comes out and its N/A front wheel drive with a 2.4 So you STFU you ****ing ******* go **** yourself
Haha. Just found this. Wow. Good job. Clearly knew what you were talking about, didn't ya?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #245  
krnkimchi702's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: freezer
hahaha i wonder where he is now.. lol
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #246  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Picking up junior high girls in his pimpin ride like every other e-thug?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #247  
xbk47's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: .........
I could be wrong but when I was researching before I bought my CVT GTS, I thought I read that Mitsubishi gets their CVT transmission manufactured by the same company the makes CVT's for other companies. Only they use their own programming(which could be way better). Looking around I see that the Nissan Altima puts out around 270hp and is offered with a CVT, and there are other vehicles with a CVT that put out alot more power than the Lancer. Has anyone actually heard from a reliable source the limitations of the CVT or is it assumed that it is just weaker? It just seems that if other companies can handle some power with a CVT couldn't the Lancer?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #248  
eg6motion's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: in my office
Originally Posted by xbk47
I could be wrong but when I was researching before I bought my CVT GTS, I thought I read that Mitsubishi gets their CVT transmission manufactured by the same company the makes CVT's for other companies. Only they use their own programming(which could be way better). Looking around I see that the Nissan Altima puts out around 270hp and is offered with a CVT, and there are other vehicles with a CVT that put out alot more power than the Lancer. Has anyone actually heard from a reliable source the limitations of the CVT or is it assumed that it is just weaker? It just seems that if other companies can handle some power with a CVT couldn't the Lancer?
thats not true. CVT's are designed differently and generally the higher hp cars have chain-driven CVT's, not belt driven like the lancer. Also, there is a large difference between the new nissan sentra CVT and our own....their's actually has power on the bottom end...ours feels like its slipping on snot and doesn't go anywhere until 3K.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Don't see why it wouldn't work if the engine is the same.
engine is not the same, mitsu will not warranty even a factory turbo kit on a 10.xx:1 compression NA engine. The RA and EVO have something like 8-9.xx:1 compression, which is generally what any factory turbo engine is.

Last edited by eg6motion; Jan 28, 2008 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #249  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
They might not warranty it (god knows I don't think they will) but it should still fit since they're all 4B11 motors. It's like the STi and the WRX, the motor is the same as far as size and fitment but there are some differences internally.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #250  
madfast's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: tsukuba turn 4
Originally Posted by ambystom01
There is no way mitsubishi will make a warranty approved turbo kit for 3000$, no way in hell. An RRM kit is more than that and they don't have to worry about 100% fitment, ease of install, tuning, driveability, etc. I would wager if they make a kit it'll be 5000$+ for just the kit and probably another 1000$ or so for install from a dealership. To help you understand, I recently bought an SPT short shifter for my car. The cost of the part was 250ish (500$ if I bought it from the dealership) and install will be another 100$. That's 350$ for a short shifter just to maintain the warranty.
the price i came up with is based on the TRD supercharger kit which goes for 3200 without installation. it was merely an example. the only thing that gives this "turbo kit" any validity is the fact that the RA will have this kit stock.

it's another way of making easy money. it can't be all that expensive when the kit already exists for another car. yes compression will be a bit of a problem, but a low boost quick spooling dealer installed turbo isn't entirely a bad idea. like i said. buy a GTS, buy the turbo kit, and you have an instant MS3 competitor. such a strategy saves the trouble of offering another trim to compete in the FF turbo category.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #251  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I wouldn't say a GTS with a turbo kit will compete with the MS3, that car was built from the factory to be fast, not merely modified afterwards. I don't see why Mitsubishi would want a FF turbo car when they already have the Ralliart coming out. I don't know anyone that would pick a FWD car over an AWD car. Quick question, is the TRD kit covered by the factory warranty?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #252  
eg6motion's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: in my office
Originally Posted by ambystom01
I wouldn't say a GTS with a turbo kit will compete with the MS3, that car was built from the factory to be fast, not merely modified afterwards. I don't see why Mitsubishi would want a FF turbo car when they already have the Ralliart coming out. I don't know anyone that would pick a FWD car over an AWD car. Quick question, is the TRD kit covered by the factory warranty?
as long as they install it. As for the MS3, I agree, 260+hp and torque is not going to happen easily on the GTS engine...or at least nowhere near as reliable. the MS3 also has a limited slip, traction control and stability control to cope with the near-EVO power it produces....GTS could cope with a little more power but would produce nothing but one-tire-fires with that kind of power.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #253  
08Lancer89's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 2
From: SWFL
I would be happy with 220 -240
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #254  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Bottom line is that the Lancer is an economy car. You can add power, but it's not going to be as good as a car prebuilt to be a boosted street monster. Once everyone accepts that, life will be fine.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #255  
Yakspawn's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Man these speculations are driving me crazy, if this highly unlikely kit does come out it would probably provide 25% more peak hp, which would put the car at 190-200hp.

There is a market for this stuff and if Mitsubishi would just set up a program like TRD for our cars then we would be in business. Look at a scion tc with a TRD supercharger for a small glimpse of what our cars may be able to do...

And thats me adding more pointless & unverified information into the fire.....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 PM.