Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

2008+ turbo kit - from xtremeboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #661  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by lookslikeanevo
thats why i pointed it out...at minimum... the 2.0l should be putting down 200s..on the extremely safe side of tuning, even then i would be disappointed... sure its making ~80whp...but we still dont have specifics on power curve, afr, idc's to see the actual potential of the kit.
and the again other point to consider is the fact the the previous gen 2.0l's were pulling these same numbers, on a weaker motor at 5-6 psi sans mivec
how much do the new lancers weigh? im sure the older lancers are lighter also.
but we'll see where this goes after the final tune
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #662  
lookslikeanevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
From: ill be home soon
Originally Posted by 4g94T
how much do the new lancers weigh? im sure the older lancers are lighter also.
but we'll see where this goes after the final tune
prolly talking about a few hundred pounds more
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #663  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Was there a base dyno run? If a stock Lancer put down 120 WHP on that dyno, 205 WHP represents a pretty hearty gain.
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #664  
JHizzle's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: UT Austin
Originally Posted by lookslikeanevo
look kid - if you knew how to exactly comprehend, the post clearly stated that the initial tune was done...and final tune wasnt, i even quoted it, then you think im referencing rrm for some stupid and irrelevant reason, so am i the lazy one that cant read and comprehend? my question still stands as valid, 1 year into a turbo project and its still not fully tuned and running? why xtremeboost is working on it, the tune is still not finalized, there are no final numbers, and there are no timeslips, ,,, yay a prelim number of 203 was posted... which is extremely disappointing, cus if you knew anything, the weaker 4g94 boosted was putting down numbers in that vicinity with a standard stage 1 kit. which in stock form, the 4g94 came with 40 less crank hp (30 less with just the 2.0L)

so take some reading comprehension classes...kthxbye

here so you can reference it is what exactly i posted and what was posted before i made my first comment
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7259520-post609.html
so you can take it to you comprehension reading class so you can ask them exactly what each referenced post means
lol i read the first sentence and stopped..if you meant something else and made it obvious..other people wouldnt have read it the same way i did..so learn how to word your **** right.. end of story..im done responding to ignorant people on this board..argue with yourself..

back on topic wise..i think xtremeboost if you guys can get it up to about 210-215 220whp max..that would be awesome. already good gains from a stock lancer. so a dyno and possibly a track run would be great..

Last edited by JHizzle; Jul 12, 2009 at 07:09 PM.
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #665  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Was there a base dyno run? If a stock Lancer put down 120 WHP on that dyno, 205 WHP represents a pretty hearty gain.
Originally Posted by yitzac1990
...and we compared it to my other dyno last year (same shop) which was 148 with intake and exhaust
so about a ~50 whp gain.

what is the correction factor that is used for this dyno?
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #666  
lookslikeanevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
From: ill be home soon
Originally Posted by JHizzle
lol i read the first sentence and stopped..if you meant something else and made it obvious..other people wouldnt have read it the same way i did..so learn how to word your **** right.. end of story..im done responding to ignorant people on this board..argue with yourself..

back on topic wise..i think xtremeboost if you guys can get it up to about 210-215 220whp max..that would be awesome. already good gains from a stock lancer. so a dyno and possibly a track run would be great..
exactly...as i thought, you mke retarded comments based on crap you dont know...

further more, you are the ones that keeps ignoring the initial fact that my first question was still valid...because of t6he absolute fact that there isnt a final tune, and final numbers...

Last edited by lookslikeanevo; Jul 12, 2009 at 07:45 PM.
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #667  
lookslikeanevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
From: ill be home soon
Originally Posted by 4g94T
so about a ~50 whp gain.

what is the correction factor that is used for this dyno?
and i really doubt his 152 crank hp lancer pulled a realistic 148whp
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #668  
xtremeboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by lookslikeanevo
this is in no way to knock on xtrememboost...

but i honestly looking for a more solid number --- with the RA at 237 base, and previous gen lancers on a weaker 2.0L 4g94 sans mivec putting down similar numbers, than just 203... 09 guys guys should definitely be expecting more than than that on a properly tuned car...

xtreme -
i guess the question no one has asked yet, is why tuning problems are you guys running into? what were the idc's at when the 203 was hit? where did the numbers peak? afr? wheres the graph?


Well tuning is actually simple , you can always use a piggie back and call it a day we just made the choice NOT to use any sort of piggie back because of pass experience . Not sure if you read that we had some dyno issues thus why we do not have a graph but as soon as we go back expect one up right away !
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #669  
EVO8904's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 498
Likes: 2
From: Wesley Chapel, FL
I must have missed it but how much psi is his car running?
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #670  
yitzac1990's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida
Originally Posted by lookslikeanevo
xtreme -
i guess the question no one has asked yet, is why tuning problems are you guys running into? what were the idc's at when the 203 was hit? where did the numbers peak? afr? wheres the graph?
you havent been paying attention.....there are NO tuning problems. we had to end early due to dyno problems, not tuning problems. we will pick back up shortly when there is time for everyone to come back out and do it again.
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #671  
yitzac1990's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida
Originally Posted by lookslikeanevo
and i really doubt his 152 crank hp lancer pulled a realistic 148whp
i have THAT dyno sheet to prove it....want me to post it? that 148 WHP was with intake and custom exhaust. so yes, i did pull a realistic 148 whp
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #672  
planetasia415's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: cali
Originally Posted by yitzac1990
you havent been paying attention.....there are NO tuning problems. we had to end early due to dyno problems, not tuning problems. we will pick back up shortly when there is time for everyone to come back out and do it again.
Awwe man, hopefully it's not too long! also, since I'm in cali, we're pzev so I think we screwed either way.
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 09:30 AM
  #673  
xtremeboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by planetasia415
Awwe man, hopefully it's not too long! also, since I'm in cali, we're pzev so I think we screwed either way.

We're trying to get everyone ready at the same time but Cory lives like an hour away , Jestr tuning always has been busy when we're not and so on but it looks like in the next day or two we're good to go
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #674  
yitzac1990's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida
Originally Posted by xtremeboost
We're trying to get everyone ready at the same time but Cory lives like an hour away , Jestr tuning always has been busy when we're not and so on but it looks like in the next day or two we're good to go
***if it involves making my car faster, i DO NOT mind the drive

and holy **** you spelled my name right lol
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #675  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by yitzac1990
i have THAT dyno sheet to prove it....want me to post it? that 148 WHP was with intake and custom exhaust. so yes, i did pull a realistic 148 whp
That must be the nicest dyno in the world.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:56 AM.