2008+ turbo kit - from xtremeboost
thats why i pointed it out...at minimum... the 2.0l should be putting down 200s..on the extremely safe side of tuning, even then i would be disappointed... sure its making ~80whp...but we still dont have specifics on power curve, afr, idc's to see the actual potential of the kit.
and the again other point to consider is the fact the the previous gen 2.0l's were pulling these same numbers, on a weaker motor at 5-6 psi sans mivec
and the again other point to consider is the fact the the previous gen 2.0l's were pulling these same numbers, on a weaker motor at 5-6 psi sans mivec
but we'll see where this goes after the final tune
look kid - if you knew how to exactly comprehend, the post clearly stated that the initial tune was done...and final tune wasnt, i even quoted it, then you think im referencing rrm for some stupid and irrelevant reason, so am i the lazy one that cant read and comprehend? my question still stands as valid, 1 year into a turbo project and its still not fully tuned and running? why xtremeboost is working on it, the tune is still not finalized, there are no final numbers, and there are no timeslips, ,,, yay a prelim number of 203 was posted... which is extremely disappointing, cus if you knew anything, the weaker 4g94 boosted was putting down numbers in that vicinity with a standard stage 1 kit. which in stock form, the 4g94 came with 40 less crank hp (30 less with just the 2.0L)
so take some reading comprehension classes...kthxbye
here so you can reference it is what exactly i posted and what was posted before i made my first comment
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7259520-post609.html
so you can take it to you comprehension reading class so you can ask them exactly what each referenced post means
so take some reading comprehension classes...kthxbye
here so you can reference it is what exactly i posted and what was posted before i made my first comment
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7259520-post609.html
so you can take it to you comprehension reading class so you can ask them exactly what each referenced post means
back on topic wise..i think xtremeboost if you guys can get it up to about 210-215 220whp max..that would be awesome. already good gains from a stock lancer. so a dyno and possibly a track run would be great..
Last edited by JHizzle; Jul 12, 2009 at 07:09 PM.
what is the correction factor that is used for this dyno?
lol i read the first sentence and stopped..if you meant something else and made it obvious..other people wouldnt have read it the same way i did..so learn how to word your **** right.. end of story..im done responding to ignorant people on this board..argue with yourself..
back on topic wise..i think xtremeboost if you guys can get it up to about 210-215 220whp max..that would be awesome. already good gains from a stock lancer. so a dyno and possibly a track run would be great..
back on topic wise..i think xtremeboost if you guys can get it up to about 210-215 220whp max..that would be awesome. already good gains from a stock lancer. so a dyno and possibly a track run would be great..
further more, you are the ones that keeps ignoring the initial fact that my first question was still valid...because of t6he absolute fact that there isnt a final tune, and final numbers...
Last edited by lookslikeanevo; Jul 12, 2009 at 07:45 PM.
this is in no way to knock on xtrememboost...
but i honestly looking for a more solid number --- with the RA at 237 base, and previous gen lancers on a weaker 2.0L 4g94 sans mivec putting down similar numbers, than just 203... 09 guys guys should definitely be expecting more than than that on a properly tuned car...
xtreme -
i guess the question no one has asked yet, is why tuning problems are you guys running into? what were the idc's at when the 203 was hit? where did the numbers peak? afr? wheres the graph?
but i honestly looking for a more solid number --- with the RA at 237 base, and previous gen lancers on a weaker 2.0L 4g94 sans mivec putting down similar numbers, than just 203... 09 guys guys should definitely be expecting more than than that on a properly tuned car...
xtreme -
i guess the question no one has asked yet, is why tuning problems are you guys running into? what were the idc's at when the 203 was hit? where did the numbers peak? afr? wheres the graph?
Well tuning is actually simple , you can always use a piggie back and call it a day we just made the choice NOT to use any sort of piggie back because of pass experience . Not sure if you read that we had some dyno issues thus why we do not have a graph but as soon as we go back expect one up right away !
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida
you havent been paying attention.....there are NO tuning problems. we had to end early due to dyno problems, not tuning problems. we will pick back up shortly when there is time for everyone to come back out and do it again.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida
also, since I'm in cali, we're pzev so I think we screwed either way.
We're trying to get everyone ready at the same time but Cory lives like an hour away , Jestr tuning always has been busy when we're not and so on but it looks like in the next day or two we're good to go
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach/Melbourne, Florida

and holy **** you spelled my name right


