Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

HELP... MAF Sensor problem...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 02:46 AM
  #16  
brutus.nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: CT
I will post pics tomorrow afternoon all i got are pics off my crackberry that arent very good. so i will take some decent ones tomorrow and post them. I am running low boost right now just to make sure everything is safe. Just like sick said. The Emusa 38mm waste gate came with a five, ten and sixteen pound spring i have the five pound in there right now. Boost controler tweeked in at about 3 pounds maybe a tad more or four even...

Yeah I figured i could not blow through the MAF during the build by seeing pictures of peoples lancer builds on this forum. But thank you for the advice. Still some little bugs to work out but getting there. I have to finish the electric powersteering pump conversion, delete the 02 front bank 02 senser. The electric fan that i bought keeps the motor running nice and cool and is on a timer that keeps running after i turn off the motor like a turbo timer. It blows at a refreshing 650 CFM...

The Turbo i have is a TO4B pretty big for this application but just what i wanted. starts to boost at 4000rpm to allow me a lot of traction on the lower end. I can get the specifics on the turbo once I find them. I was like a little kid when it came in the mail threw everything that came with it away... Anyway back to the daily grind
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #17  
Sicktght311's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by ThunderOZ
I don't think that 165whp on a turbo like that at 3psi makes sense. What size is it? If it is the td04 I'm thinking of, it's like a 13a from a dsm, tiny in otherwords. I didn't even know you could get a wastegate spring that low...
at 7lbs, the lancer only puts out about 195whp. so 30 hp difference from 4lbs of boost makes sense.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #18  
FiReTRuCKoZ's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
if it has a 5 lb spring, you'll be running 5 lbs. a boost controller only raises the boost levels, not lowering them under what a wastegate runs. and you should get a 1250 cfm fan, because 650 isn't going to be enough, after running the absolute **** out of it later on when you get all the kinks worked out. Just some stuff I know from the experience I had turboing my old car.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #19  
FiReTRuCKoZ's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by Sicktght311
at 7lbs, the lancer only puts out about 195whp. so 30 hp difference from 4lbs of boost makes sense.
our cars aren't 135 hp at the wheels, thats at the crank.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #20  
Sicktght311's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by FiReTRuCKoZ
if it has a 5 lb spring, you'll be running 5 lbs. a boost controller only raises the boost levels, not lowering them under what a wastegate runs. and you should get a 1250 cfm fan, because 650 isn't going to be enough, after running the absolute **** out of it later on when you get all the kinks worked out. Just some stuff I know from the experience I had turboing my old car.
Didnt see this

+1 on this. If your wastegate spring is set at 5psi, you should be putting out 5psi. A boost controller only increases the boost from the spring's number. Sounds like you have a boost leak somewhere.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #21  
*02Lancer*'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 552
Likes: 10
From: L-burg
delete the 02 front bank 02 senser.
I wouldnt delete that one. It is the one the ECU uses to control fuel trims. The rear 02 is just there to verify the condition of the CAT. Why do you want to delete the first one anyway?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #22  
Sicktght311's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by FiReTRuCKoZ
our cars aren't 135 hp at the wheels, thats at the crank.
Turbo, not NA. The RRM turbo kits at 7psi were averaging 190-200whp.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #23  
ThunderOZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 1
From: Newport News, Virginia
Different turbo all together...
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #24  
FiReTRuCKoZ's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by Sicktght311
Turbo, not NA. The RRM turbo kits at 7psi were averaging 190-200whp.
Ok. The way I took what you said was that he's getting 30 whp out of the 3 or so lbs. and he said 165, which would mean we have 135 whp. But I see what you are saying now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tehjoser
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
Feb 15, 2025 01:49 AM
FRESH.I.AM
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
20
Jul 15, 2016 07:12 PM
duranvw
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
15
May 31, 2012 06:41 AM
Jonas
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
18
Jul 28, 2009 07:19 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:51 PM.