Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Goal: Fastest N/A Lancer-----mods list inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #61  
KillahB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Originally Posted by jamie
what can it beat besides a geo metro or a torqueless dx honda there is no hope the car is just slow even with 3000 dollar non intercooled turbo it can barely hang with tib gt spev svt focus si hondas rsx s. it takes forced induction like 10psi or more to make the car respectful then have to worry about popping are ****ty pistons.
It's people like you that make me wonder, why the hell do you even bother to come to a site about modifying cars, if you are going to bring all this negatively. Seriously, guy, NO ONE wants to hear it. Some people cannot afford an Evo and its insurance, some people do what they do to be unique, some people start off with a platform and just keep going.... the bottom line is that they come to an automotive forum for ADVICE and ENCOURAGEMENT. Not someone to bash them at every corner. Do everyone a favour, bro, sell your car, buy some other make and get off this forum, if that is all you plan on bringing, pure negativity.

Now this prospectively purposeful post will get clouded by jackasses like you stating that this guy is wasting his time. Here's a novel idea: let HIM decide what is a waste of HIS OWN time, and not someone else with an opinion. And instead of bringing him down, let's try some ENCOURAGEMENT for a change.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #62  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Well then what are you talking about? For an economy car, the lancer is pretty good, it shows good torque and decent handling. Its not a sports car, and its not a luxury sedan, its an economy car that can be made just that extra bit faster. This is the same thing as those american muscle boys who walk around going "oh its made by those short fellers over there in that japan so it can't hold a candle to my camaro", but I'm sure the STi and Evos drivers would take offense to that.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #63  
OZLancerlunatic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: BEANTOWN FOREVER
the lancer comes stock with torque?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #64  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by OZLancerlunitic
the lancer comes stock with torque?
Well more than the competition, hell almost more than the supposed top of the line honda (S2000).
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #65  
Sir Lancelot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Originally Posted by jamie
its just stupid and pointless because at the end of the day it is still slow and can get beat by about every other car out there
Except yours...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #66  
jamie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: fort walton bch fl
no it doesn't what you all fail to realize i had about 10,000 into my lancer i liked the car it was fun .sir lance can do whatever he wants its his money my biggest point is why spend all that money on na and not get that big of gains?the car stock is slow it is slow with boltons you need fi to make fast it is as simple as that.does the truth hurt?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #67  
jamie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: fort walton bch fl
i have a spec v now with simple bolt ons and can do the 1/8 mile in 9.5 at 75 mph something most turbo lancers can't do.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #68  
jamie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: fort walton bch fl
sir lancelot even with a specv that has 175 hp and 185 tq stock it is hard to get180 whp out of a specv
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #69  
KillahB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Originally Posted by jamie
no it doesn't what you all fail to realize i had about 10,000 into my lancer i liked the car it was fun .sir lance can do whatever he wants its his money my biggest point is why spend all that money on na and not get that big of gains?the car stock is slow it is slow with boltons you need fi to make fast it is as simple as that.does the truth hurt?
No but your idiocy does.

Originally Posted by jamie
i have a spec v now with simple bolt ons and can do the 1/8 mile in 9.5 at 75 mph something most turbo lancers can't do.
Great for you. Do us a favour.... Troll at http://forums.thevboard.com/ and leave us alone please.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #70  
Shingen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by jamie
no it doesn't what you all fail to realize i had about 10,000 into my lancer i liked the car it was fun .sir lance can do whatever he wants its his money my biggest point is why spend all that money on na and not get that big of gains?the car stock is slow it is slow with boltons you need fi to make fast it is as simple as that.does the truth hurt?
Jamie, there are people who know way more about this than you do, and they are all on this thread. You might have had 10,000 dropped into your car but maybe you didn't do it right. If these guys say it can be done then I believe them. Sirlancelot, good luck man.

Fox
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #71  
Sir Lancelot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Originally Posted by Sir Lancelot
Except yours...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #72  
jamie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: fort walton bch fl
airquez i spent money on my car i liked it it was fun racing people and beating alot of them in a econobox lancer that was priceless. just stating the car is not na friendly.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #73  
k.lowe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: md
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Well I'm sure he can beat the golf, miata, civic and probably the prelude considering those things have no torque.
ok ur a dumbass the preludes h22 came with teh most tourqe out of anyhonda fwd usdm motor
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #74  
jamie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: fort walton bch fl
the car was done right it was all rrm and installed at a shop. sir slow alot how is that owning me when your car can't even measure up performance wise. the turbo was 3100 plus pistons plus labor thats about 4300 the rest was cosmetic or strut bars etc..

Last edited by jamie; Feb 28, 2005 at 09:12 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #75  
Shingen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by jamie
airquez i spent money on my car i liked it it was fun racing people and beating alot of them in a econobox lancer that was priceless. just stating the car is not na friendly.
You've got several guys that know something about N/A tuning saying that it is possible. A guy from RPW with more knowledge about the subject matter then you can shake a stick at saying it is possible. About three other guys who all know their shi t saying that it can be done, and then there is you... the only N/A work done to your lancer buy the way that I could see were some forged pistons and I/H/E... You went FI, that worked for you. Good job... You have a Spec V now... great...

Now here's a guy that wants to go N/A and is willing to do the hard work involved. Mad props to him for doing something different. This car modding stuff isn't about doing what everyone else is doing, but being different.

Fox
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 PM.