Dyno'd lancers list
#46
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When i raced I had 17"s, I didnt get a chance to race last weekend, it rained. I should be able to race this sunday though so we will see. I wish I had kept my stock rims would be great for racing. I asked the question before but will ask agian, with the listed mods I have should i put the test pipe back on?
#47
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
Yes I agree with you, I was being a smart@$$. I do think a header is my next step, if they ever make a CARB one. Also, it's possible that WADAD's Lancer started out with higher base numbers. None of us were smart enough to dyno our cars stock. And yes, I do think that there is a wide margin of error, room for climate conditions, etc. But if everyone with an RPW header tested similar results, that would be solid. Until then, I'm just going to do whatever I think would be best for my car.
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hehehe
it only makes sense that RPW would dyno higher than RRM, sorry to take this OT but look at the construction of the two. RPW gets rid of the stock downpipe. There has to be within reason a larger gain on their header.
I make no commission at all
I simply offer what enjoyment I got from buying the header.
WADAD
it only makes sense that RPW would dyno higher than RRM, sorry to take this OT but look at the construction of the two. RPW gets rid of the stock downpipe. There has to be within reason a larger gain on their header.
I make no commission at all
I simply offer what enjoyment I got from buying the header.
WADAD
#51
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
That's true. Unfortunately for me, I need to keep both cats in just in case one of my competitors wants to make a stink about the rules. So unless they make a 2 in 1 high flow cat, I am waiting for a CARB approved header to come out. Anyway, sorry to get off topic. Any more dynos?
#52
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
toss me on the list at 138.1 on a dynojet but a 4th gear pull on an auto (dont ask it was an error by the tech and i wasnt paying attention). 5PSI intercooled turbo on an auto.
for what it's worth that calculates out to about 193.96 whp in 3rd.
I am going back next week with exhaust and a boost controller.
for what it's worth that calculates out to about 193.96 whp in 3rd.
I am going back next week with exhaust and a boost controller.
#54
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
exatly. it is like pulling in 5th haha overdrive is fun. i wondered why my dyno sheet started off high and went low. heheh. can we say shift point then TQ converter lock up? hahahah whoops.
#55
1996 mirage coupe
3rd gear
221kw=300fwhp, roughly 370hp at the flywheel
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...23_14_full.jpg
3rd gear
221kw=300fwhp, roughly 370hp at the flywheel
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...23_14_full.jpg
#60
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
I know all my pulls both stock and turbo were on dynojets. Same dynojet to be specific. I like to keep everything consistent on and dyno's... temps were about the same 72 and 75 degrees. As for dyno numbers i feel they are cool but on the street is where you see what it's really made of. My girl dusted a 350Z twice last night. I think the car is doing well.
Manual guys should be pulling in 4th as that is the 1:1 ratio gear... why are some pulling in 3rd? Also what conversions are you using for auto's. I'm not familiar with that conversion at all.
Manual guys should be pulling in 4th as that is the 1:1 ratio gear... why are some pulling in 3rd? Also what conversions are you using for auto's. I'm not familiar with that conversion at all.