EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

2002-2006 Lancer Super FAQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 12:06 PM
Share
  #91  
x2003lancerESx's Avatar
x2003lancerESx
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
From: north america
Originally Posted by ambystom01
You will not hit 180 HP in a Lancer with just bolt-ons and tuning. You will need forced induction or serious NA work. I have not seen a single car hit 180 HP using the 4G94 motor. Some have tried but no one has actually shown a dyno suggesting a 60 HP gain over stock without a turbo, supercharger or nitrous.
i would have to disagree. it's definitely POSSIBLE. i've had 3 lancers so far (2003 ES, 2005 ES, 2007 ES) and i dyno'd at 170 BHP for all of them, with no "crazy" engine work. i highly doubt i have the highest-HP N/A lancers in north america.
Reply
0
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 12:36 PM
Share
  #92  
Green_Bandit's Avatar
Green_Bandit
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 5
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Dude. No.
Reply
0
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 02:36 PM
Share
  #93  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by x2003lancerESx
i would have to disagree. it's definitely POSSIBLE. i've had 3 lancers so far (2003 ES, 2005 ES, 2007 ES) and i dyno'd at 170 BHP for all of them, with no "crazy" engine work. i highly doubt i have the highest-HP N/A lancers in north america.
Sure you did. Let's see the dynos.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 08:30 AM
Share
  #94  
KING FILIP's Avatar
KING FILIP
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: North America
Originally Posted by x2003lancerESx
i would have to disagree. it's definitely POSSIBLE. i've had 3 lancers so far (2003 ES, 2005 ES, 2007 ES) and i dyno'd at 170 BHP for all of them, with no "crazy" engine work. i highly doubt i have the highest-HP N/A lancers in north america.
not bad. i'm at about 140 horsepower at the wheels. naturally-aspirated, of course.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 10:59 AM
Share
  #95  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
And what was stock? Dynos are pointless without a comparison.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 11:37 AM
Share
  #96  
KING FILIP's Avatar
KING FILIP
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: North America
stock was about 100 HP at the wheels.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 11:40 AM
Share
  #97  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Where are the dynos and what are your mods? I'm highly skeptical.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 11:48 AM
Share
  #98  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Lol, yep, I call BS. If you can't prove your claims, or even provide a mod list, they're worthless.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 11:52 AM
Share
  #99  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Like I said, provide a dyno or a mod list that explains your claim of a 40 hp gain from NA modifications on a 2.0 L econobox.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:01 PM
Share
  #100  
KING FILIP's Avatar
KING FILIP
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: North America
almost everything is stock on my 2.0-liter engine. i do, however have the following upgrades:

- short ram intake from RRM.
- custom-built 2" eliminator pipe.
- 50 shot of nitrous oxide.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:04 PM
Share
  #101  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
So that engine isn't long for this world. Plus nitrous isn't really a bolt-on mod.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:06 PM
Share
  #102  
KING FILIP's Avatar
KING FILIP
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: North America
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Plus nitrous isn't really a bolt-on mod.
maybe not. but i wouldn't call it forced induction, either.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:22 PM
Share
  #103  
ambystom01's Avatar
ambystom01
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
It is forced induction, you're forcing the engine to take in more air than it could by itself.
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:27 PM
Share
  #104  
KING FILIP's Avatar
KING FILIP
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: North America
Originally Posted by ambystom01
It is forced induction, you're forcing the engine to take in more air than it could by itself.
i'm going by what's in your FAQ. you got it listed under "naturally aspirated."
Reply
0
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 12:31 PM
Share
  #105  
x2003lancerESx's Avatar
x2003lancerESx
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
From: north america
Originally Posted by KING FILIP
not bad. i'm at about 140 horsepower at the wheels. naturally-aspirated, of course.
cool stuff, man. me too. looks like we're at pretty much the same numbers.
Reply
0



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 PM.