Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.
View Poll Results: What type of gas do you use?
Regular
158
58.96%
Plus
21
7.84%
Premium
75
27.99%
I don\'t use gas, I run my car on hydrocarbons
14
5.22%
Voters: 268. You may not vote on this poll

Lancer Miles Per Gallon [MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 01:11 PM
  #46  
Onikun's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
I am consistently getting 330-340 miles per 10 gallons. All of this is city driving. I also wrok nights and hardly ever use the AC. Plus I have a RMR air intake..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 02:34 AM
  #47  
cupOZnj's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
would an intake really help fuel economy? what about exhaust/headers? i can figure out if this would help or hurt fuel economy......
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 03:39 AM
  #48  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Intakes may improve it slightly. Header and other exhaust components are post burn. They shouldn't change a thing. Anything that affects the air/fuel ratio could change your mileage however.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 05:22 AM
  #49  
diesel_fan's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Raynham, MA
Efficiencies gained in the exhaust system can affect fuel economy in a positive fashion. Most stock exhaust systems don't efficiently empty the combustion chamber of spent gasses on the exhaust stroke, especially as rpms increase since backpressure increases. A situation develops where on the next intake stroke you mix the incoming a/f mixture with leftover combustion product from the last power stroke, decreasing overall efficiency.

In addition, the higher the backpressure, a higher % of energy produced on the crank from cyl(s) on the power stroke is consumed by cyl(s) on the exhaust stroke vs having that wasted energy make it to where you really want it -> the transmission.

I don't think we're talking huge numbers here, but then again not so small that you wouldn't notice the difference. My 4Runner had a high performance Toyota header accessory option (TRD) and I remember the pamphlet touting higher fuel economy as one of the benefits. I think it claimed around a 10% fuel economy increase.

Last edited by diesel_fan; Oct 20, 2002 at 09:04 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2002 | 08:54 AM
  #50  
cupOZnj's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
yeah...i mean it makes sense, but i don't have enough knowledge to just assume that it does help. but your points seem valid. i would think that anywhere that you can improve the efficiency of your car would help fuel economy in some manner....
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2002 | 08:58 AM
  #51  
LBLancerDude's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az & Long Beach, Ca
1.29
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2002 | 11:17 AM
  #52  
pearlwhiteoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: THE OC. California
about 22mpg-25mpg...i drive in city a lot..and i use chevon Premium maybe i dirve my car too hard...i think im gonna try to feed my lancer w/ regular..and i wanna see if i can feel the difference
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #53  
odulancer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, VA
I know I'm a little last on posting, but I have a 03' and I get about 26-27 MPG city/highway. I went on a road trip and found myself at 30MPG max. If you look at the specs on the 02 and 03 fuel economy...they are different. Not really sure why though.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #54  
odulancer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, VA
by the way...I also have an auto.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:55 PM
  #55  
zlancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 2
From: Jerzey
i get about 13 mpg when i drive under boost and get about 20 mpg without boost. and use sunoco ultra 94 octain. $1.67. NJ
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:55 PM
  #56  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
My car on average will get at least 350 miles on about 11 gallons of regular gas ($1.31). Most of my mileage is highway miles while I'm commuting from campus to work to home and there's no need for A/C in Washington.

::edit:: Forgot to mention that's Chevron gas I'm drinking and an auto tranny.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 02:47 PM
  #57  
KTRLancer02's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Fontana, Ca. Inland Empire 909
i get about 330 miles to the tank and just bought gas at a whopping $1.53 at the Chevron. I do both city and Hwy. AT
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 02:48 PM
  #58  
KTRLancer02's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Fontana, Ca. Inland Empire 909
hey ghostider, even when i only drive on the hwy i dont get that kinda mileage. You drivin' at grandma speeds? (me: 70mph with no a/c )
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 05:43 PM
  #59  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Nah, speed limit's 60 and I'm going at least 70.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 06:17 PM
  #60  
HighestOlive's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
No actually I agree with GhostRider. I get any where between 350 and 400 miles per tank, and I am by no means driving grandma speeds. I would say my average is mid-70's but lately I have been driving 80+mph.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 AM.