2005 Mustang GT- Be READY fellas!
Originally Posted by 3000ways
Um I don't like magazine racing, and I think of couple of EVOM members have already ran into 2005 Mustang GTs and won. Don't get me wrong, the 2005 Mustang GT is a sweet car but it has no where near the performance capabilities of an Evolution. Plus Motor Trend always tests fast, the EVO they tested ran the 1/4 mile in 13.0 seconds, so I doubt the new Mustang will in reality hit 60mph in under 5 seconds with the manual tranny. I believe Road and Track and Car and/or Driver have tested the car, and it has ran with the manual transmission 13.8-14.0 Seconds. You see that is why magazine tests can be tricky, of course they should be noted, but magazine tests should just be looked as part of the equation, not the whole answer.
Nice, bag on us, because we "test fast". I guess we should test slower? That's a new one...
Originally Posted by loj68
bottom line is Rustang buyers and EVO buyers are typically 2 different people. EVO's aren't bought to be going in a straight line and Rustangs aren't bought to hang curves on a track day. It's like comparing knives and forks man.......sure, they're both silverware....but different uses altogether 

Of course I could say that comparing an SRT-4 to an Evo on the track is like coming a fork to a knife, but even though I spent my hard-earned money on the Evo I still appreciate what Dodge has done with the SRT-4.
Last edited by EVO Neil; Nov 6, 2004 at 01:14 PM.
Originally Posted by EVO32570
Ive never seen a stock EVO go 13 flat in the quarter.I think these magazines are nuts with some of the times they come out with.
Last edited by EVO Neil; Nov 6, 2004 at 08:40 PM.
Originally Posted by v8killer
Bro with only 2 posts Newbie you sure have a way of introducing yourself to the Evo forum while talking up the Stang, letting us know we better be on our game. WTF is Ford paying you to go from site to site for this and just pop in and talk up the Stang.
If you like the mustang so much maybe you should go to www.chickcarofthecentury.com or www.fordlivesofthepastandcallsitretro.com
But on a serious note the car is quick, and no true car guy has ever doubted their performance capabilty.
If you like the mustang so much maybe you should go to www.chickcarofthecentury.com or www.fordlivesofthepastandcallsitretro.com
But on a serious note the car is quick, and no true car guy has ever doubted their performance capabilty.
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
Nice, bag on us, because we "test fast". I guess we should test slower? That's a new one... 

A mustang owners opinion on magazine tested times of the 2005 Mustang GT-
11-05-04, 11:07 AM #54 mach1dsg vbmenu_register("postmenu_4722945", true);
Member
Trader Rating: (0)
My Garage
Join Date: September 2004
Location: Orange County,CA
Posts: 56
i don't doubt the 13.0, but the mods to get there. maybe he's hidding he has 4.30 gears, and some serious weight reduction besides all the mods he listed already... no wonder it was so easy to beat that 05 GT
.
i'm still waiting for that low 13's slip out of any of the new 05 GT's. so far the magazines are winning the contest, unreal
__________________
2003 Mustang Mach 1 DGS 5 speed
SLP Loudmouth
PHP Spacer
K&N Drop-in
Removed Air Silencer/Snorkel
Mobil 1 0W20
286 rwhp @6100rpm 308 rwtq @4200rpm
60': 2.145
13.41@105.67MPH
Member
Trader Rating: (0)
My Garage
Join Date: September 2004
Location: Orange County,CA
Posts: 56
i don't doubt the 13.0, but the mods to get there. maybe he's hidding he has 4.30 gears, and some serious weight reduction besides all the mods he listed already... no wonder it was so easy to beat that 05 GT
.i'm still waiting for that low 13's slip out of any of the new 05 GT's. so far the magazines are winning the contest, unreal
__________________2003 Mustang Mach 1 DGS 5 speed
SLP Loudmouth
PHP Spacer
K&N Drop-in
Removed Air Silencer/Snorkel
Mobil 1 0W20
286 rwhp @6100rpm 308 rwtq @4200rpm
60': 2.145
13.41@105.67MPH



