Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Disappointed with the Shelby GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2006, 08:03 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
3000ways's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disappointed with the Shelby GT500

I don't know about you, but me I am a little disappointed in the upcoming Shelby GT500. I mean I have no doubts it will be a bad *** car, but honestly I was just expecting more. With 500HP and Shelby all over it, I was expecting it to be the baddest Mustang of all time. WTF happend, nearly 4000lbs, are you kidding me, the car is a bloated pig! I was also expecting quicker straightline acceleration, I have no doubts that despite this magazine's numbers and numbers from other magazines the Shelby GT500 should be a mid 12s@114-115MPH car on the average, which is faster stock for stock than a 2003-2004 Cobra, but with 500HP I was expecting it to blow the previous generations away. All around the Shelby GT500 is a better car than the 2003-2004 Cobra, which is good, but still I was expecting so much more. For a base price of $41,000 I really was expecting more. I have my doubts on this car selling as well as Ford hopes, I just don't see 2003-2004 Cobra owners running to Ford dealerships to upgrade to a car that is much more expensive, much more heavier, and in many cases, much more slower than what they already have.


Old Jun 4, 2006, 08:25 AM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (24)
 
PapitoEVO8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would not get it for track use, its too heavy. But for daily driving and the feel of a V-8 I would.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 08:31 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
evo_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Las Vegas
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blame the 4000lbs curb weight for the slow 1/4 mile times. I don't see why they can't get this thing to weight the same as the older SVT cobra. Granted it does have a bigger engine but I'm pretty sure that alone wouldnt add 500lbs+ to the car. It's looking like this new cobra is shapping up to be a drag car instead of a well rounded muscle car the previous cobra was. This thing reminds me of the 3000GT VR4 which also suffers from a 4000lbs curb weight.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 08:55 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
N1te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo_z
blame the 4000lbs curb weight for the slow 1/4 mile times. I don't see why they can't get this thing to weight the same as the older SVT cobra. Granted it does have a bigger engine but I'm pretty sure that alone wouldnt add 500lbs+ to the car. It's looking like this new cobra is shapping up to be a drag car instead of a well rounded muscle car the previous cobra was. This thing reminds me of the 3000GT VR4 which also suffers from a 4000lbs curb weight.
A 3000gt weighs around 3600-3700 lbs, not over 4000.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
3000ways's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VR4s weighed in around 3700lbs, now the VR4 spyder weighed around 4000lbs.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:00 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
3000ways's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at that weight distribution, just sad. This car is good, is an improvement over the previous generation all around, but could have been much more.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:18 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Kings Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow what a pig! This is just 1 magazine's review, I'm sure they can get a faster 1/4 mile out of it.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:30 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Turbojunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all true, but wait till someone buys one and starts slapping aftermarket exh, pullys, ect. you get the idea. that would rape alot of cars on the road with minimal mods imo.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:32 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAY 500hp= low 13's, on the street where there are no drag slicks(for the most part) our cars are monsters...

Scorke
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:38 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Dayton_EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In Hell, but making my way out
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does 12.7@116mph 1/4 mile stock.
0-60 4.5sec.

And damn, that monster is almost as heavy as my full size 4x4 truck.
I'd say if i bought one, I would strip it down to essentials only just to see what weight can be dropped.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:38 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
1NastyEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys....the other magazine, not sure if it was Motortrend or Car & Driver...but one of those did 12.6 @ 116 fyi.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:46 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
Google's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car and Driver pulled 12.9 @ 116, not 12.5
Old Jun 4, 2006, 10:15 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
evo_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Las Vegas
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
considering it has almost the same HP as the Viper and Z06, it should've done better.
Old Jun 4, 2006, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Kings Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo_z
considering it has almost the same HP as the Viper and Z06, it should've done better.

Yeah it should, if it wasn't for the 700 or so pounds more than the vette
Old Jun 4, 2006, 11:56 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (43)
 
RenoEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ford needs to retire


Quick Reply: Disappointed with the Shelby GT500



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 PM.