Notices
ECU Flash

Colby, Tephra, EVO4Mad and the rest of the experts, take a look.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 06:34 AM
  #1  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Colby, Tephra, EVO4Mad and the rest of the experts, take a look.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...as-anyone.html

That's a link to a thread posted here on EVOm. I just want to point it out to those of you who have put out an excellent product for a minimal charge or in even free.

My suggestion is, make the software you guys are using compatible with only YOUR cables, which I believe they may be already, no?

The thread pissed me off.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:11 AM
  #2  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Yeah I don't really think you can make a 1.3 or 2.0 cable much cheaper than what Colby/Hamish sell em for...

meh - whatcha going todo, always gonna be someone trying to do more for less.

it makes me laugh thou, $30k for a car, $50-100 a week in gas, god knows how much on mods and you can't afford $150 for a cable??

ps - David did you get my PM in Aug?
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #3  
SoCal Rally's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
David, I doubt there is any need to worry, the Tactrix/Evoscan cables are definitely more complicated than just a "bunch of wires and connectors", hence why they cost more.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #4  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Crap I bought my 1.3 back in the day when they first hit the market. Best 100 I have ever spent.

Cable has done countless hours worth of tuning and logging on multiple cars. And saved me hundreds if not thousands in dyno time over the years. Its the link to my car still running after 120k miles.

Heck I'd buy 1 a year if I had to it's made it's money back 1000 fold at this point

Last edited by gsrboi80; Sep 8, 2009 at 07:31 AM.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #5  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
mmm the 2.0 cable DEFINITELY is more complicated... inbuild processor which requires firmware etc...
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:40 AM
  #6  
SoCal Rally's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Even the 1.3 cable is more complicated than just a "bunch of wires and connectors", it too has circuitry inside which I'll refrain from elaborating on.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #7  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeh... FTDI for starters
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
The 2.0 cable is so complicated that they have had a hard time remembering how they go together and have caused a worldwide backorder.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #9  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 10
From: New Hampshire, USA
To make this a philosophical debate, to improve on the cost/efficiency/reliability of any technology is a plus for society as a whole. It's a more efficient use of resources. Patent law and "intellectual property" laws really hinder technological advancement, and simply being the first to market with a product does not mean you should be the sole benefactor of its use in society.

It should be emergent, ever-changing, ever-improving, becoming cheaper and easier to make, and more reliable and long-lasting.

Instead, we'd rather pin technologies on one person or company and allow them to squeeze society for every last drop, making products who's pillars are not the societal benefit, but the benefit of the expansion of their profits... that's why we have technology today with poor quality, planned obsolescence, and high prices.

Technological progress is somehow equated to consumers spending more money on it, when it actuality, progress should be how little we spend on it. If there's a way to make a cheaper, or more efficient, or more reliable anything in this world, it should be encouraged, not shot down.

www.thezeitgeistmovement.com

Last edited by recompile; Sep 8, 2009 at 08:35 AM.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I think he'll experience what most of us do when we think we can do something just as well for less.

To do something well, a one off piece will almost always cost you more then had you just bought it from somewhere else. That's the power of high volume manufacturing.

Some of us just keep doing our own thing because we find it enjoyable.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
DBallz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: South Beach, FL / Miami, FL / Pt. St. Lucie, FL / NYC
Excuse my french that that thread is ****ing stupid. I'm no expert but I knew from the day I purchased a intake I was going to be throwing money at this car. These guys kill me with cutting corners.....hope the OP on the other thread fries his/her ECU for being cheap. I can't afford to buy a cable right now so I will just sit and wait. Oh well to each his own
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #12  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
tephra, if I didn't respond to your PM I didn't get it. I have emptied my box since then and I can't go back and look. If there is ANYTHING you need from me, please send the PM again and I'll get on it ASAP. I truly appreciate what you do for everyone.

recompile, you are out of line, sorry. I agree with everthing you said BUT in this case, these guys are doing the programming and such so cheap or free already that to have someone want to take it a step further and make the cable free too is just rediculous.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
recompile, you are out of line, sorry. I agree with everthing you said but in this case, these guys are doing the programming and such so cheap or free already that to have someone want to take it a step further and make the cable free too is just rediculous.
+1

Also, the OP of that thread should be banned.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #14  
Raceghost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 21
From: Out West
To make this a philosophical debate, to improve on the cost/efficiency/reliability of any technology is a plus for society as a whole. It's a more efficient use of resources. Patent law and "intellectual property" laws really hinder technological advancement, and simply being the first to market with a product does not mean you should be the sole benefactor of its use in society.

It should be emergent, ever-changing, ever-improving, becoming cheaper and easier to make, and more reliable and long-lasting.

Instead, we'd rather pin technologies on one person or company and allow them to squeeze society for every last drop, making products who's pillars are not the societal benefit, but the benefit of the expansion of their profits... that's why we have technology today with poor quality, planned obsolescence, and high prices.

Technological progress is somehow equated to consumers spending more money on it, when it actuality, progress should be how little we spend on it. If there's a way to make a cheaper, or more efficient, or more reliable anything in this world, it should be encouraged, not shot down.
Recompile, I couldn't agree more.

However, I also agree with Bushur that cutting cornes can be just as detrimental to society, and to the process of advancement.

Interesting read though.
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #15  
Import Junky's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 0
From: Lansdale
I'm with Dave on this one. You can't even put a price tag on the Ecuflash forum and the knowledge base in there. I can't believe you still have people that complain. How about the countless free hours upon hours that these guys are dedicating to this community that most of the time they do for free and only sometimes asks for a donation.......a freakn donation!!!! I hope these people fry their ECUs as well.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 AM.